You have no clue as to what you're talking about, and no clue what we're talking about. You're attacking a strawman, through and through. After all of the discussions you've had with us on these forums - you're being either remarkably obtuse or remarkably dishonest.
"The Rothbardian doesn't claim that the absence of a state is a sufficient condition for bliss. Rather, the Rothbardian says that however prosperous and law-abiding a society is, adding an institution of organized violence and theft will only make things worse." - Robert Murphy
"The Constitution either gives us the government we have, or it's powerless to prevent it; either way it is unfit to exist". - Lysander Spooner
"If men are good, then they need no rulers. If men are bad, then governments of men, composed of men, will also be bad - and probably worse, due to the State's amplification of coercive power." - Ozarkia
And this one is especially for *you*...
"The idea of a strictly limited constitutional State was a noble expiriment that failed, even under the most favorable and propitious circumstances. It failed then, why should a similar expiriment fair any better now? No, it is the conservative laissez-fairist, the man who puts all the guns and all the decision-making power into the hands of the central government and then says, "Limit yourself"; it is he who is truly the impractical utopian." -Murray Rothbard