What Elon Musk Really Wants

[acptulsa]

Besides the obvious? I mean, the obvious benefit if Trump wins, that Elon has made no secret of, is that his businesses will no longer be the targets of personal vendettas by the federal government.

Did you mean something else, besides that?

I have no second residence inside Musk's head. But that is certainly possible, and many other things are possible too. Many things that many people would consider mighty tempting. Things Zuckerberg used to indulge in before the tide began to turn, just to start with. Musk is an imaginative guy.

 

[TheTexan]

I have no second residence inside Musk's head. But that is certainly possible, and many other things are possible too. Many things that many people would consider mighty tempting. Things Zuckerberg used to indulge in before the tide began to turn, just to start with. Musk is an imaginative guy.

Sure, but I'm not gonna judge Elon on things he might do. When he does it, I'll judge him then

 

[acptulsa]

Sure, but I'm not gonna judge Elon on things he might do. When he does it, I'll judge him then

There's a lot less chance of being unjust to him that way.

He might genuinely think the nicest thing he could do for you is give you a neuralink. He's that kind of cockeyed optimistic techie, I think. Want one? Want resistance to be futile? Might he convince his buddy Trump, who does not have the greatest sales resistance, to mandate them?

Give him too much rope and he might hang someone besides himself.

 

[fisharmor]

Meh.

How did the Zionists finally put Israel over? Hitler targeted Jews. "Hitler was a bad guy" is much more than a cliché. It's the foundation the Zionists laid to sucker the people who had just won WWII into building Israel upon.

So what if Mao killed somewhere between three and ten times as many people? With these people, it isn't what you know, it's who you know. Likewise it isn't how many you kill, it's who you kill.

I mean, you did it yourself, right here.
"between three and ten times as many people"
I'm assuming the implication is that Mao killed 60 million on the outside, because 6 million jews * 10 = 60 million. That's the only way this statement adds up.
But Hitler didn't kill 6 million people. He killed 6 million Jews.
If we go with the 11 million figure of people who were killed in the Holocaust, even the unsupported 100 million claim for Mao doesn't equal 10x.

It truly isn't how many you kill, it's who you kill. The other 5 million, the 45% of the victims of the Holocaust, they count just as much as the half million or so Tutsis that "never again" likewise didn't apply to.

 

[acptulsa]

Will Rogers said peace is like a beautiful woman. It's wonderful, but it bears watching.

Well, these days everything wonderful bears watching.

 

[acptulsa]

I mean, you did it yourself, right here.

LOL, so I did. I was vague because it makes me sick to research all those socialist/fascist/communist deaths. Obviously the Zionist propaganda set one extreme of my range, yes.

Busted.

It truly isn't how many you kill, it's who you kill. The other 5 million, the 45% of the victims of the Holocaust, they count just as much as the half million or so Tutsis that "never again" likewise didn't apply to.

That's it. Those others weren't a crisis the Zionists could use.

 

[TheTexan]

I mean, you did it yourself, right here.
"between three and ten times as many people"
I'm assuming the implication is that Mao killed 60 million on the outside, because 6 million jews * 10 = 60 million. That's the only way this statement adds up.
But Hitler didn't kill 6 million people. He killed 6 million Jews.
If we go with the 11 million figure of people who were killed in the Holocaust, even the unsupported 100 million claim for Mao doesn't equal 10x.

It truly isn't how many you kill, it's who you kill. The other 5 million, the 45% of the victims of the Holocaust, they count just as much as the half million or so Tutsis that "never again" likewise didn't apply to.

Yea I thought it was funny some years back when Wikipedia changed the definition of the Holocaust to only include Jewish deaths. Says all that really needs to be said

 

[fisharmor]

LOL, so I did. I was vague because it makes me sick to research all those socialist/fascist/communist deaths. Obviously the Zionist propaganda set one extreme of my range, yes.

Busted.



That's it. Those others weren't a crisis the Zionists could use.

LOL It's just a personal mission of mine to call this out whenever possible. Mostly because I REALLY don't like getting programmed. Everyone makes this mistake and follows their Zionist programming with those numbers, even if they really don't mean to.

 

[TheTexan]

LOL It's just a personal mission of mine to call this out whenever possible. Mostly because I REALLY don't like getting programmed. Everyone makes this mistake and follows their Zionist programming with those numbers, even if they really don't mean to.

Technically it's not a mistake. Hitler murdered 6 million Jews, and everyone else that died, were just, like, well, victims that happened to die, during that process.

At least according to Wikipedia.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Elon hate pretty much always is cus of his relationship with Trump.

That, and the purchase of Twitter.

"Public Enemy Number Two"



[German] https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/u...r-zwei-a-19071f99-5099-4e2a-aa87-c7a17ab9c046
[archive (German): https://archive.ph/sF6Jk]

 

[fisharmor]

Technically it's not a mistake. Hitler murdered 6 million Jews, and everyone else that died, were just, like, well, victims that happened to die, during that process.

At least according to Wikipedia.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure they need that to be the case. If you look into it even a little bit further you discover the Nazis were eliminating the 'useless eaters' well in advance of turning their sights on Jews... and if we recognized that, the fine editors at Wikipedia et al would have to answer questions about why the British health service is doing the exact same thing and why they support that.

Meanwhile we've all got our panties in a bunch about an eccentric who wants to let people voluntarily turn themselves into cyborgs. We already know exactly how that's going to turn out: exactly like the trans agenda did. Some people are going to ignore warnings and go through it, and we're going to start getting regret stories pouring in.

 

[Snowball]

Milei lowers taxes AFTER all his tribe members come in and buy up the industries he stole from the Argentine people.

On the positive side, if "Israel" is bombed to kingdom come, maybe more of them will refugee to Argentina instead of the U.S.

Concerning Musk, another tribe member, he's just an appointed gatekeeper in the technology arm.
They use him to roll out whatever is next on their slow-drip.

These people all know very well how to exploit the "base" with sugar-coated poison.

 

[TheTexan]

Meanwhile we've all got our panties in a bunch about an eccentric who wants to let people voluntarily turn themselves into cyborgs. We already know exactly how that's going to turn out: exactly like the trans agenda did. Some people are going to ignore warnings and go through it, and we're going to start getting regret stories pouring in.

I generally agree but it's not gonna be all bad. There are gonna be some useful prosthetics that come out of this

 

[acptulsa]

"Public Enemy Number Two"

... his greatest project: t[sic]he undermining of liberal hegemon--er, I mean democracy.

 

[Occam's Banana]

"Public Enemy Number Two"

[German] https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/u...r-zwei-a-19071f99-5099-4e2a-aa87-c7a17ab9c046
[archive (German): https://archive.ph/sF6Jk]

Corporate media "associate editor" sez what?

https://x.com/stillgray/status/1849482737763131787

 

[fisharmor]

I generally agree but it's not gonna be all bad. There are gonna be some useful prosthetics that come out of this

And if that's where it stopped, then it would be an unequivocal good. The problem is he's jumping past that straight to Alita Battle Angel.

 

[Madison320]

Again, when did enacting Randian policies become a negative?

Trump has said, multiple times, he is going to appoint Musk to specifically target government programs and subsidies for cuts and elimination.

Please point out where Harris or Walz has proposed anything at all like that.

The fastest way to wreck a country is to go after big business, just look at how fast venezuela went to hell. Trump has a lot of faults, mainly the out of control spending, but he's more likely to leave big businesses alone. When the stuff hits the fan from the debt crisis, Harris could get dangerous. She's already says she's going to enact price controls.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

I like Musk and am glad he is involved. I think he has done more than anyone in my lifetime.

 

[jmdrake]

And this is a bad thing how, exactly?

You're really reaching when you have to post Marxist bilge from The Atlantic to make your case against Trump or Musk.

Are you planning on signing up for a brain chip?

https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/neuralink-brain-chip-elon-musk-computer-b2516214.html

If that happens it's game over. It doesn't matter whether or not you sign up for one. If another people sign up for a chip that some other person can use to send signals into that person's brain, it's game over. You're concerned about whether or not the military will take orders to shoot at Americans? I bet cyborgs will obey the command.



And yes. I am concerned that the same president that greenlighted Operation Warp Speed would greenlight ^that. When Elon Musk was considered by everyone to be left wing I found his brain chip idea creepy. His switching parties hasn't changed my mind. (No pun inteneded).

 

[FineSpeech]

Even if it's coming from the left, it's important to analyze and criticize those on the right instead of acting like their flaws aren't there.