This movement needs to be more tolerant...

EndTheFed said:
I have been in this forum for quite a while now.. I am fully supportive of Ron Paul and really support educating people as t what is going on.

Fully supportive does NOT mean agree with every point. The following issues are important to some here:

The war
Monetary policy
The Federal Reserve
The IRS
End the drug war

The problem is not everyone here is going to agree with everyone else.

Ron Paul seems to believe in LIBERTY which means I have liberty too an you should not be taking my liberty either or calling me names because I believe differently than you.

Some in this movementneeds to GROW UP and learn to win people over and persuade people with facts.

Calling people with differing opinions names is NOT going to help your cause.

Thanks,

:)
Click to expand...

I agree with this 100%.
I also agree with the poster below that post who said trolls have been around making personal attacks instead of substance. I was a victim of that too. I have no tolerance for that type of ignorance.
 
Howie_Feltersnetch said:
I agree with this 100%.
I also agree with the poster below that post who said trolls have been around making personal attacks instead of substance. I was a victim of that too. I have no tolerance for that type of ignorance.
Click to expand...

dude, one post and you've been a victim of personal attacks?

idiot.

:p
 
georgiaboy said:
You just radically changed the subject from my statement that Ron Paul votes on principle to an indictment of everyone on the forum - that's quite a leap.

I assume I've sufficiently convinced you on my earlier point that Ron Paul does indeed and has voted principle over party, strategy, or quid pro quo. We therefore move on to your new statement.
Click to expand...

No. did you not read what I said about sometimes cirumstance over rules principle? (The IRS example) He is "voting with his action"

To your statement, you are correct and I agree that everyone is free to decide where they should compromise.

My specific statement about standing on principle regarding not voting for McCain has to do with the fact that I am a Red-blooded conservative Republican who votes accordingly, and McCain is no conservative.

I don't care who he runs with, he wouldn't know the US Constitution if it tea bagged him in the face.
Click to expand...

So I assume that you are saying as a "Red-blooded conservative Republican"
you and the movement are going to be better off with Obama in office. I would also assume you think the supreme court will be better off?

Is this what you think?

I was born in Macon by the way...
 
Last edited:
EndTheFed said:
No. did you not read what I said about sometimes cirumstance over rules principle? (The IRS example) He is "voting with his action"
Click to expand...

I did and responded. Then you changed the subject.



So I assume that you are saying as a "Red-blooded conservative Republican"
you and the movement are going to be better off with Obama in office. I would also assume you think the supreme court will be better off?

Is this what you think?

I was born in Macon by the way...
Click to expand...

I won't be any better off either way. The movement will be better off with a McCain loss.
No evidence to say that there would be any difference in SCOTUS picks.

I'm living in Georgia, will probably die here, but not born here. Proudly Southern born & raised, though. Macon's a nice enough place. Lots of 'massage' parlors cropped up there lately, though.
 
georgiaboy said:
I did and responded. Then you changed the subject.





I won't be any better off either way. The movement will be better off with a McCain loss.
No evidence to say that there would be any difference in SCOTUS picks.

I'm living in Georgia, will probably die here, but not born here. Proudly Southern born & raised, though. Macon's a nice enough place. Lots of 'massage' parlors cropped up there lately, though.
Click to expand...

Yea... I moved to Alabama when I was 5 or 6 . Many years ago....

I disagree about the Supreme court... I think Obama would pick horrible choices...
 
Bman said:
Just go vote for McLame, and enjoy the four more years of dipsomania you have brought on yourself.
Click to expand...

And at the same time.. continue to educate people...

So tell me something... how does voting 3rd party keep me from enjoying 4 more years of dipsomania that someone else brings on me? Hmmmm
 
Last edited:
EndTheFed said:
And at the same time.. continue to educate people...

So tell me something... how does voting 3rd party keep me from enjoying 4 more years of dipsomania that someone else brings on me? Hmmmm
Click to expand...


Educate? On what?

Voting 3rd party may not keep you form dipsomania. But the path to recovery is to first admit that you have a problem. You're here so maybe you have, but it's time to get off the juice buddy.
 
Bman said:
Educate? On what?
Click to expand...

Obiously you havent read this thread... All though it I have said that obama or mccain is going to win this election... as far as I am concerned we as a movement need to continue to educate people using things like freedom to fascism dvd... and continue to grow the movement so maybe by the next electio we will be big enough to make a difference (i mean WIN). In the mean tim e obama would make terrible appointments to the supreme court that would set the movement back even further...

Voting 3rd party may not keep you form dipsomania. But the path to recovery is to first admit that you have a problem. You're here so maybe you have, but it's time to get off the juice buddy.
Click to expand...

as stated before I think obama would put us backwards not on the path to recovery...
 
EndTheFed said:
Obiously you havent read this thread... All though it I have said that obama or mccain is going to win this election... as far as I am concerned we as a movement need to continue to educate people using things like freedom to fascism dvd... and continue to grow the movement so maybe by the next electio we will be big enough to make a difference (i mean WIN). In the mean tim e obama would make terrible appointments to the supreme court that would set the movement back even further...
Click to expand...

I've read the thread, I just didn't know what your implication of education was in the specific post.

Supreme Court is a stupid reason to vote for one of these two unless you have names and reasons against said to be appointed. The reason I say this is because you are dealing in speculation. I'd give the anology of playing black or red on the roulette table.


EndTheFed said:
as stated before I think obama would put us backwards not on the path to recovery...
Click to expand...

With all the information at hand I would use another anology. This is the pot calling the kettle black.

McCain's not going to shrink government. Have you been missing what he's been saying about the current financial crisis. And at least Obama has admitted that he cannot raise taxes until the economy recovers.

Hell I'd be willing to wager that Obama would more likely to balance the budget than McCain. Too bad it's more than likely a rhetorical statement.

Maybe you have reasons for one sucking less than the other, but I can say I truely understand why you hate name calling, when you bring it on yourself in the manner you have.

Saying I'm bewildered by some of your logic would be an understatement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

jmdrake
Veterans far more likely to be mass shooters than transgenders
4 5 6
Replies
110
Views
646
jmdrake
jmdrake
PAF
More Drug-War Murders on the High Seas
Replies
0
Views
50
PAF
PAF
PAF
Libertarianism and Metaethics
Replies
0
Views
96
PAF
PAF
Voluntarist
Why Isn't ICE/INS Arresting/Citing Employers Who Hire Undocumented Workers
Replies
8
Views
82
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
PAF
What Is Left Of MAGA Is Not A Movement Of People Anymore
2
Replies
38
Views
751
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Back
Top