Veterans far more likely to be mass shooters than transgenders

[PAF]

I thought you cared about liberty and freedom?

I'm here defending your planet earth and you still can't agree with me!

 

[TheTexan]

I'm here defending your planet earth

It's mine go away

 

[Invisible Man]

Genocide is defined under international law by the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide as any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; or forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Yes, it is genocide.

Not that I give any weight to what the UN says, but voluntary interracial marriage does none of those things.

 

[PAF]

Not that I give any weight to what the UN says, but voluntary interracial marriage does none of those things.

I take it @Anti Federalist and @TheTexan are opposed to mail order brides too. Even ones from Brazil and Russia.

 

[TheTexan]

I take it @Anti Federalist and @TheTexan are opposed to mail order brides too. Even ones from Brazil and Russia.

The nature of my ethics is that there is a "hot white chick" exception to every rule

 

[Anti Federalist]

I take it @Anti Federalist and @TheTexan are opposed to mail order brides too. Even ones from Brazil and Russia.

LOL - One of my fellow Captains ordered a Russian bride.

Hooo, she was fucking gorgeous.

Took that poor man for an emotional and monetary ride that defies imagination.

It hurt me just to hear about it.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Not that I give any weight to what the UN says, but voluntary interracial marriage does none of those things.

Abortion sure does.

So does mentally conditioning entire generations of women to not have kids, or to queer kids even before puberty.

 

[Invisible Man]

Abortion sure does.

So does mentally conditioning entire generations of women to not have kids, or to queer kids even before puberty.

But we weren't talking about abortion. We were talking about voluntary interracial marriage.

Also, whites are not over-represented in having abortions.

 

[Anti Federalist]

But we weren't talking about abortion. We were talking about voluntary interracial marriage.

Also, whites are not over-represented in having abortions.

I wasn't.

You mentioned my name here:

In AF's thinking, what you are describing is genocide.

Granted, this is an abuse of the English language. Nevertheless, that crowd persists in using the word that way, keeping a straight face while they do, and as far as I can tell, not seeing anything odd about it.

What is being done to the White race is most certainly a "genocide".

Carry on.

 

[Invisible Man]

I wasn't.

You mentioned my name here:



What is being done to the White race is most certainly a "genocide".

Carry on.

Do you believe that voluntary interracial marriage is genocide?

If you say you don't, then I'll be glad to stand corrected.

 

[jmdrake]

What government has done, which it is bad enough all by itself, is force us, at gunpoint, to live amongst each other and have Whites get slaughtered for it.

70 years ago it was the same old shit.

And if you go back 140 years, you'd find it was the same old shit, yet again.

Jim Crow and segregation was not in place to lord over blacks and being petty about bus seating and water fountains.

It was to protect Whites from the bloodshed, murder and mayhem of blacks.

Scott Adams is right, this is not fixable.

One more thing. I followed your "Grok" link and nothing was there. So I did my own.

https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1965852159444136309

==========================================

140 years ago what were the statistics of blacks killed by whites and whites killed by blacks in the United States?



Searched for "white victims black perpetrators homicide US 1885"
10 results
Show All (4)
Historical ContextIn 1885, the United States was in the post-Reconstruction era, a period marked by intense racial violence in the South and border states. Systematic national homicide statistics by race of victim and perpetrator did not exist, as the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting program began only in 1930. Data on racial killings primarily come from records of lynchings—extrajudicial mob murders, overwhelmingly perpetrated by whites against Blacks to enforce white supremacy and suppress Black civil rights. These were often public spectacles, not concealed crimes, and were documented by organizations like the Tuskegee Institute (which tracked lynchings from 1882 onward) and the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI).Lynchings represented a significant portion of interracial homicides, particularly those of Black victims by white perpetrators. Intraracial homicides (e.g., Black-on-Black or white-on-white) occurred but were underreported and not systematically broken down by race until later decades. Total U.S. homicides in the 1880s were low compared to today (estimated at around 5,000–6,000 annually nationwide, based on vital statistics from the era), but racial terror killings were concentrated in the South, where most Black Americans lived.Key Statistics for 1885Based on Tuskegee Institute records, which provide the most reliable annual tally of lynchings (defined as unlawful killings by groups without due process):

Category	Number of Incidents	Victims	Perpetrators	Notes
Blacks killed by whites (primarily lynchings)	109	109 Black individuals	White mobs	These were almost exclusively racial terror lynchings in Southern states (e.g., Mississippi: 22, Texas: 13, Louisiana: 10). Victims were often accused of crimes like murder or rape against whites, but many were innocent or killed for minor "offenses" (e.g., "disrespect" or economic disputes). Lynchings accounted for the majority of documented interracial killings of Blacks.
Whites killed by Blacks	~0 (lynchings)	0 white individuals	Black individuals	No recorded lynchings of whites by Black mobs in 1885. Isolated homicides may have occurred (e.g., in self-defense or disputes), but they were rare and not systematically tracked as racial killings. Overall white victimization rates were low, with most white homicides being intraracial (white-on-white).

• Total lynchings in 1885: 109 Black victims and 74 white victims (whites were typically lynched by other whites for crimes like theft or murder, not racial reasons).
• Broader interracial context: From 1882–1885, more whites were lynched overall than Blacks (e.g., 1882: 52 Black vs. 53 white), but by 1885, Black lynchings had surged due to rising white supremacist violence post-Reconstruction. The trend escalated dramatically in the 1890s (e.g., 161 Black lynchings in 1892).

Limitations and Broader Trends

• Underreporting: Lynchings were often celebrated locally and not always recorded as crimes, so totals may be low. EJI estimates 2,000 additional Black lynchings during Reconstruction (1865–1876) alone, suggesting even higher undercounts in the 1880s.
• Non-lynching homicides: Some Black-on-white killings occurred in labor disputes or self-defense against racial violence, but they were exceptional and often led to retaliatory lynchings. White-on-Black killings extended beyond lynchings (e.g., private murders), but lynchings were the most visible form of racial homicide.
• Demographic disparity: Blacks comprised 12% of the U.S. population (6.5 million) but faced homicide rates far exceeding whites due to systemic terror. This violence contributed to the Great Migration, as Black families fled lynching hotspots.

These figures highlight how racial killings were tools of oppression, with white perpetrators targeting Blacks at rates vastly disproportionate to population size. For comparison, modern data (e.g., 2019 FBI) shows most homicides are intraracial, but historical interracial violence was structurally different.
==========================================

And nobody is forcing you at gunpoint to live next to black people. You just aren't allowed to use you gun to keep a black person from buying your neighbors house. But if you set up a "private club" like Shoal Creek did you can have your "all white community" that you crave so much.