libertyvidz
Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2010
- Messages
- 76
Early stage of a video I'm working on. Here's the script. It's AI engineered (ran prompt through several iterations). I generated a video but I'm not happy with the final product yet. Just putting this much out there for motivation to actually finish this.
[Opening Hook]
Let’s talk about guns, hypocrisy, and what politicians aren’t telling you.
Charlie Kirk said some gun deaths are “worth it.” Kamala Harris said she supports the Second Amendment — even owns a Glock. And now California, the state Harris calls home, is moving to ban future sales of that very gun.
[Visual: charliekirkpic1.jpg, kamalaharrispodium.jpg, californiacapitol.jpg. Title overlay: “Charlie Kirk, Kamala Harris, and the Gun Debate Nobody’s Having”]
[Part 1: Kirk’s Quote in Context]
Charlie Kirk said:
[Visual: charliekirkpic2.jpg with text overlay of quote, highlight “worth it”]
It sounds cold, but here’s the context. Kirk was talking about acceptable risk, comparing it to driving.
[Visual: trafficaccident.jpg, overlay text: 50,000 deaths per year]
His point? The Second Amendment also carries risk. And pretending you can eliminate it entirely is utopian nonsense.
[Part 2: Harris’s Position]
Now Kamala Harris. On the campaign trail in 2024 she told Oprah:
[Visual: kamalaandoprah.jpg, overlay text “I support the Second Amendment”]
When Oprah pressed, Harris admitted:
And in another interview with Bill Whitaker she added:
[Visual: kamalaandbillwhitaker.jpg, then cut to glockhandgun.jpg]
So Harris draws the line: rifles like AR-15s should be banned, but Glocks are fine for “law-abiding citizens.”
[Part 3: The Reality of Mass Shootings]
But here’s the reality. Most recent mass shootings weren’t committed with rifles at all.
[Visual: hushlounge.jpg, trendsetter.jpg, dadeville.jpg, vatech.jpg blurred victims for sensitivity. Overlay: “Handguns, not rifles.”]
The National Institute of Justice confirms it:
[Visual: nijchart.jpg (you can make this in Canva or Excel). Overlay: 77% handguns vs. 25% rifles]
[Part 4: California’s New Glock Ban]
This summer, California lawmakers advanced AB 1127:
[Visual: californiacapitol.jpg with “Bill Passed” stamp overlay, then glockhandgun.jpg crossed out]
Supporters say it closes the switch loophole because a Glock switch can be printed on a 3D printer that costs as little as $49. Critics say this could lead to a ban of all semiautomatic handguns.
[Visual: 3dprinter.jpg, overlay text: Switch loophole?]
And here’s the irony: Harris owns a Glock — yet California wants to ban future sales of the gun she says is fine for self-defense.
[Visual: kamalaharrisportrait.jpg, overlay: “Her gun — now banned?”]
[Part 5: The Policy Gap]
Step back: would Harris’s preferred laws have stopped these shootings?
Even Charlie Kirk himself was killed with a bolt-action hunting rifle — a gun not covered by an “assault weapon” ban.
[Visual: huntingrifle.jpg, overlay: “Not an assault weapon”]
So the laws Harris supports wouldn’t have stopped the weapons that caused these shootings — or the one that killed Kirk.
[Closing]
Bottom line: Charlie Kirk said the Second Amendment comes with risk — like driving — but it’s worth it. Harris said she supports the Second Amendment too, but draws the line at rifles, not handguns.
Yet 77% of mass shootings are committed with handguns. And California’s response? Ban new sales of the Glock Harris owns.
So ask yourself: are lawmakers targeting the guns that cause the most deaths — or just the ones that are politically convenient to ban? Please like and subscribe for more content like this including a future video on ways to curb gun violence without violating civil liberties or relying solely on mass incarceration.
[Visual: glockvsar15.jpg side-by-side silhouette, overlay text: 77% handguns vs. 25% rifles. Fade out with: “The debate nobody’s having.”]
[Opening Hook]
Let’s talk about guns, hypocrisy, and what politicians aren’t telling you.
Charlie Kirk said some gun deaths are “worth it.” Kamala Harris said she supports the Second Amendment — even owns a Glock. And now California, the state Harris calls home, is moving to ban future sales of that very gun.
[Visual: charliekirkpic1.jpg, kamalaharrispodium.jpg, californiacapitol.jpg. Title overlay: “Charlie Kirk, Kamala Harris, and the Gun Debate Nobody’s Having”]
[Part 1: Kirk’s Quote in Context]
Charlie Kirk said:
[Visual: charliekirkpic2.jpg with text overlay of quote, highlight “worth it”]
It sounds cold, but here’s the context. Kirk was talking about acceptable risk, comparing it to driving.
- 50,000 Americans die on the roads each year.
- We could ban driving and eliminate those deaths.
- But as a society, we accept that risk because freedom and mobility matter.
[Visual: trafficaccident.jpg, overlay text: 50,000 deaths per year]
His point? The Second Amendment also carries risk. And pretending you can eliminate it entirely is utopian nonsense.
[Part 2: Harris’s Position]
Now Kamala Harris. On the campaign trail in 2024 she told Oprah:
- “I’m in favor of the Second Amendment.”
- She supports an assault weapons ban, red flag laws, and universal background checks.
[Visual: kamalaandoprah.jpg, overlay text “I support the Second Amendment”]
When Oprah pressed, Harris admitted:
And in another interview with Bill Whitaker she added:
[Visual: kamalaandbillwhitaker.jpg, then cut to glockhandgun.jpg]
So Harris draws the line: rifles like AR-15s should be banned, but Glocks are fine for “law-abiding citizens.”
[Part 3: The Reality of Mass Shootings]
But here’s the reality. Most recent mass shootings weren’t committed with rifles at all.
- Hush Lounge, Birmingham (2024): Glock with an illegal switch. 4 killed 17 injured
- Trendsetter Lounge, Birmingham (2024): same shooter, same weapon. 4 killed 10 injured
- Dadeville Sweet 16 (2023): teens with handguns. 4 killed 32 injured
- Virginia Tech (2007): 32 killed with two handguns.
[Visual: hushlounge.jpg, trendsetter.jpg, dadeville.jpg, vatech.jpg blurred victims for sensitivity. Overlay: “Handguns, not rifles.”]
The National Institute of Justice confirms it:
- 77% of mass shootings involve handguns
- 25% involve rifles
- 80% of school shooters steal guns from family
[Visual: nijchart.jpg (you can make this in Canva or Excel). Overlay: 77% handguns vs. 25% rifles]
[Part 4: California’s New Glock Ban]
This summer, California lawmakers advanced AB 1127:
- Starting 2026, new Glock sales banned.
- Police and military exempt.
- Current owners keep theirs.
[Visual: californiacapitol.jpg with “Bill Passed” stamp overlay, then glockhandgun.jpg crossed out]
Supporters say it closes the switch loophole because a Glock switch can be printed on a 3D printer that costs as little as $49. Critics say this could lead to a ban of all semiautomatic handguns.
[Visual: 3dprinter.jpg, overlay text: Switch loophole?]
And here’s the irony: Harris owns a Glock — yet California wants to ban future sales of the gun she says is fine for self-defense.
[Visual: kamalaharrisportrait.jpg, overlay: “Her gun — now banned?”]
[Part 5: The Policy Gap]
Step back: would Harris’s preferred laws have stopped these shootings?
- Hush Lounge? No. Handguns with switches.
- Trendsetter Lounge? No. Same.
- Dadeville? No. Teenagers with handguns.
- Virginia Tech? No. Two legally purchased handguns.
Even Charlie Kirk himself was killed with a bolt-action hunting rifle — a gun not covered by an “assault weapon” ban.
[Visual: huntingrifle.jpg, overlay: “Not an assault weapon”]
So the laws Harris supports wouldn’t have stopped the weapons that caused these shootings — or the one that killed Kirk.
[Closing]
Bottom line: Charlie Kirk said the Second Amendment comes with risk — like driving — but it’s worth it. Harris said she supports the Second Amendment too, but draws the line at rifles, not handguns.
Yet 77% of mass shootings are committed with handguns. And California’s response? Ban new sales of the Glock Harris owns.
So ask yourself: are lawmakers targeting the guns that cause the most deaths — or just the ones that are politically convenient to ban? Please like and subscribe for more content like this including a future video on ways to curb gun violence without violating civil liberties or relying solely on mass incarceration.
[Visual: glockvsar15.jpg side-by-side silhouette, overlay text: 77% handguns vs. 25% rifles. Fade out with: “The debate nobody’s having.”]
