Me
Born 1960. Expat. In fact, dual citizen (U.S. / British) Lived almost my entire life outside the U.S. Have never voted in a U.S. election - though was once briefly registered to vote in NC as a Democrat. (Senator Sam Ervin was one of my political heroes as a kid. Am I the only one here who thinks that his political outlook bears a remarkable resemblance to that of Dr Paul?)
I have not taken much interest in US presidential elections since 1980, but I was politically active in Britain in the early 1980s with the Liberal Party.
Why Ron Paul?
I never heard of Dr Paul until September, when I was looking at the political compass website. I noticed that Dr Paul occupied a unique political position among the presidential candidates, so read about him on Wikipedia. I liked what I read, and dug a little deeper, and was quickly convinced. The main factors were his:
1) Stance on the Iraq war. (Since I live outside the U.S., a candidate’s foreign policy is pretty important to me.) I watched
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7d_e9lrcZ8 (the SC debate) and read his 35 questions that won’t be asked.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul52.html Here was a man who actually understands foreign policy and the world we live in. America’s reputation has been tarnished by over half a century of meddling in the affairs of other nations, and it has done the U.S. no good at all.
2) Stance on the Constitution, the roll of the judiciary and the rule of law. I read
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul172.html and
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul208.html and agreed. If you are going to have a constitution, you stick to it.
3) Opposition to big government. (My philosophy is “Pass no new laws and repeal half the ones we’ve got.”)
4) Stance on abortion. It seems to me that if it’s wrong to kill babies after they are born, it’s wrong to kill them before.
5) Record of personal integrity. I get the impression that he is also a decent and humble human being. For me, that is extremely important. It is also sadly rare in politicians.