CPAC - Straw Poll Today (update: Rand Paul wins!)

Coulter was scheduled to speak at 4:40, so looks like everything is running 15 minutes behind, look for results at 5:15.
 
I wonder if Fox News will use footage of booing from CPAC 2010 when they announce Rand Paul the winner, just like they did when Ron Paul won in 2011.
 
Coulter was scheduled to speak at 4:40, so looks like everything is running 15 minutes behind, look for results at 5:15.

OK thanks, I just got back online . . .

rand2016cblue_zps6eb5f890.jpg



Well, Rand could win California Ms. Coulter . . . imho

Are we ready for Randslide everybuddy ?

Should Chris Christie been invited ?
 
Last edited:
Blacks and Republicans go together like chocolate and peanut butter.

Way to go, Ann. You absolutely are... obnoxious as hell.

Oh and she just acted proud of how CPAC attendees are skewing young. I wonder who could be behind that?
 
I wonder if Fox News will use footage of booing from CPAC 2010 when they announce Rand Paul the winner, just like they did when Ron Paul won in 2011.

Dude, that was a totally onest mistake someone made to dig around amd get old file footage and splice it in with then current results. That things like that only happen to Ron are complete coincidences.

/s
 
You might take another look. Since her rocky and naive start, she has been saying some pretty good and Libertarian things. You only recognize her shallowly for her body, yet today she demonstrated the very ideal of Libertarian self-control with her big gulp stunt. Something I find amusing, yet very poignant. Definitely Libertarian.
I've been following palin for awhile, first through her husband's Alaskan secessionist movement. I had always thought of her as libertarian, until she decide to sell out every one of those ideas for power within the party. she didn't stand with ron, she stood with McCain. how does that look in today's moldy gop.
 
The Republican Party certainly isn't going to be successful at all if they follow what Coulter just advocated.
 
Dude, that was a totally onest mistake someone made to dig around amd get old file footage and splice it in with then current results. That things like that only happen to Ron are complete coincidences.

/s

I know you're being sarcastic, but as I am fond of saying, the easiest way to spot bias in reporting is to look at the "errors" and who is helped/hurt by them. If they are truly accidental errors, they will not follow a pattern and will scatter at random. Given a reasonable survey sample, the less-random the distribution is, the more it suggests the errors are infact intentional attempts to skew opinion. In the case of Ron Paul, the helped-to-hurt ratio was something like 98% hurt, over a very large duration and sample size. At such a point, the intent of the bias is clear.
 
Back
Top