• Welcome to our new home!

    Please share any thoughts or issues here.


B
Reaction score
2,392

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Just an FYI:

    1. My answer to my own poll question is probably "yes", though its an exceedingly reluctant "yes."

    2. The more reluctant someone is, the less quick I'm going to be to judge them. You, frankly, are not the type of person I was considering when I made my OP, even if you techncially qualify. You're against legal torture and you agree that its almost always wrong. There are a lot of people who support legal torture and who think at least some of what was in the Senate Report was morally permissible (At least at my school there are, admittedly, my school is pretty "conservative"). I much more had in mind the neoconservative who says "torture is always justified against terrorists if there's a chance to save even one life" than I am a generally peaceful person that reluctantly says they could justify torturing someone if it meant saving their family, or something like that.
    OK, so in that situation you're almost dealing with Hiroshima and Nagisaki again (not as it actually occured, but what most people think of it as.) Fair enough...

    Still distressing.... I'm not sure what that says of those people who actually think these were all ticking time bomb situations.
    Do you think it would ever be moral to let someone die of hypothermia in a cold cell? Do you ever think it would ever be moral to break someone's legs and force them to stand for hours or days? Do you ever think it would be moral to consecutively waterboard someone 183 times?

    Is your only issue with this the potential for abuse, or do you understand that there is something deeply immoral about this?
    There's something sickening and inhumane about about what was described in the CIA report. Killing someone in self-defense when they are trying to shoot you isn't comparable to that.
    Sorta, but there are plenty of people here who think it should be legal. So, where's the line where the form of torture becomes inhumane no matter what?
    TC, I apologize for the neg rep. I was in a really bad mood today, both from seeing the CIA report and seeing people here at school defend it. I took it out on you. I deserved the neg rep you threw back. Sorry...
    "Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims." I'm pretty sure that's deserving of what I said. I never called you a war monger or anything else. In fact that was the first time I ever criticized you. What you said was really over the top and I stand by my criticism in that case
    I don't know if its actually true or just perception, but it seems like you are more interventionist than you were even just a few days ago.
    For what its worth, I completely agree that there's a huge difference between you and Sean Hannity. But I think there's a sizable difference between you and Ron Paul as well.
    Yeah I understand and I agree assuming by "rape" we mean actual force and not slight age of consent violations. I doubt most cops even know the difference though. I've heard that they reject applicants for the police force who have IQs above a certain level and it wouldn't surprise me. It certainly seems most (not all) of them are morons who don't even think about the things they do.

    One thing I've found crazy is when I've seen "resisting arrest" as being the ONLY cause for a person being arrested. Don't you kind of have to commit some other crime before you can be legally arrested? ITs getting crazier and crazier and my resentment toward them is growing more and more.
    I usually reserve neg repping for total morons and people I don't have respect for.

    I really wanted to neg rep you because I like SF's posts and I really wanted to show disapproval of that particular post but I know some people take neg reps personally and I like you to so I decided to do what I did instead.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top