Sandman33
Banned
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 2,632
I didn't create any of the male work threads.
But I would say that it may open peoples eyes to the bullshit propaganda that they are fed in wimmins studies and equality harping.
Why men earn more (the real version)
- Thread starter Spider-Man
- Start date
I didn't create any of the male work threads.
But I would say that it may open peoples eyes to the bullshit propaganda that they are fed in wimmins studies and equality harping.
I like them because they give yet another chance to debunk the "~70%" lie from the media... goes way beyond women's studies and feminists.
Andrew-Austin
Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2007
- Messages
- 4,997
AHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!The shit they teach you in wimmins studies!
I challenge you to spend one week in a business office ran by all women.
You'd be surprised just how much women discriminate against THEMSELVES.
All the dumb sexism in this thread aside, its no secret a lot of women tend to really dislike the company of their own kind. I've had a few admit to me that "girls are stupid", not literally but just meaning their really unpleasant to one another. Men on the other hand are cool / easy going.
Then again you have the "all men are jerks" type of gals.
Nirvikalpa
Unapologetic Feminist
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2008
- Messages
- 5,287
AHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!
I challenge you to spend one week in a business office ran by all women.
You'd be surprised just how much women discriminate against THEMSELVES.
That's not women's studies. I am a biology/pre-med major with a concentration in reproductive biology.
And what does your comment have anything to do with the statement I provided? Can you refute that a male's testosterone levels vary over the course of a day?
No, instead you took another approach - attacking me on the basis of something I did not even state or allude to.
Sandman33
Banned
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 2,632
That's not women's studies. I am a biology/pre-med major with a concentration in reproductive biology.
And what does your comment have anything to do with the statement I provided? Can you refute that a male's testosterone levels vary over the course of a day?
No, instead you took another approach - attacking me on the basis of something I did not even state or allude to.
Im not attacking you.
My comment was that you're being told that mens testosterone levels effect men like PMS does women. Thats an absolute LIE and laughable at best. And the proof is in the pudding. Spend a week in a business office ran by women and you will see.
That's not women's studies. I am a biology/pre-med major with a concentration in reproductive biology.
And what does your comment have anything to do with the statement I provided? Can you refute that a male's testosterone levels vary over the course of a day?
No, instead you took another approach - attacking me on the basis of something I did not even state or allude to.
It does not matter, fact of the matter is women go through emotional roleercosters thus called PMS... I have never seen emo males... because they don't exist. Emo males are females.
To add to the above, logic/reason/evidence points its a productivity issue, because if they were equally productive males would not have a market in the work place, because females would be cheaper. Thus any employer who hires males would be driven out of business through competition.
Go look at the wage gap with never married/single women there is no wage gap.
Go look at the wage gap with never married/single women there is no wage gap.
amonasro
Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2007
- Messages
- 2,915
My wife works in a senior position at an ad agency with a bunch of men. She said she actually prefers working with men rather than women; women are too dramatic, catty, gossipy, etc... she constantly complains about it.
That being said, she goes through her fair share of emotions, but she does it behind closed doors and deals with it on her own. I think the women who are successful in the business world are able to harness the logic and simplicity that men have, and use it to their advantage.
That being said, she goes through her fair share of emotions, but she does it behind closed doors and deals with it on her own. I think the women who are successful in the business world are able to harness the logic and simplicity that men have, and use it to their advantage.
Paulitical Correctness
Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
- Messages
- 2,697
Wouldn't expect to see stuff like this in a place called the "Liberty Forest".
Come on, guys, don't group the whisker biscuits together.
Come on, guys, don't group the whisker biscuits together.
Kludge
Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2007
- Messages
- 21,719
Is that some kind of sexist slur?
Paulitical Correctness
Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
- Messages
- 2,697
^ I was trying to keep the thread trend of douchebaggery alive. 
someperson
Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 981
I, too, am not sure what that term means, but I agree about the collectivist nature of this thread. Individuals should be judged, if at all, only by their own merits and faults. I've been seeing quite a few threads lately based, either loosely or directly, on the group assignment of traits to individuals. I don't think I need to enumerate the various topics, but it's not something I would expect to see from the individuals here.
Sandman33
Banned
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 2,632
^ I was trying to keep the thread trend of douchebaggery alive.
Well you succeeded.
Thats the first actual insult to women instead of mere commentary on experiences and fact.
Dont insult women..
Sandman33
Banned
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 2,632
Collectivist smecktivist. This is in general. And if it werent you wouldnt find so many people (even women) agreeing with it.
Paulitical Correctness
Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
- Messages
- 2,697
Well you succeeded.
Thats the first actual insult to women instead of mere commentary on experiences and fact.
Dont insult women..
The women here are tough as nails, they can handle it.
Disclaimer// I was being ironic. Do not take offense please.
someperson
Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 981
Even if many individuals, who are women, agree, or even if most agree, I don't believe this majority assent can, or should, allow the traits assigned in the op to be generalized to all women, most women, many women, or even any single one of those individuals. If an individual woman decides those traits apply and that, for example, she isn't as smart as "a man" (whoever that is), she can believe that if she so chooses.
After being here for a while, I'm sure you're already aware of the negative effects of collectivism and the group assignment of traits and motives, so I won't go into some pointless rant to convince you to see it my way... lol I hope this wasn't already a pointless rant. Please understand that this is simply my belief, and I don't wish to impose upon you. I'm sure, with the best of intentions, you truly believe in what you're saying; I just wish people would cease applying such generalizations.
Sandman33
Banned
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 2,632
You were the first to bring up men being smarter than women....but hey, if the shoe fits....
Men and women DO have separte chess leagues.
The truth is that no one is saying ALL women. Thats like saying ALL men love tits...well I'm sure theres a few gay guys out there that would tell you otherwise....but in general...men like tits.
someperson
Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 981
Just for that part in the op. I obviously don't appreciate the insinuation there, but it's ok.
Last edited:
Sandman33
Banned
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 2,632
someperson
Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 981
AHH ok.. didnt catch that.
It's ok, I sometimes start reading a thread at the end, going backward and never get to the start lol
Similar threads
