Trump’s “Day One” Dictatorship

You are creating a hypothetical scenario, which is great. Don't fund the illegals. I'm on board. Next step....where do these jobs come from in your scenario, and what's the plan if these communities riot?

Exactly. But instead of discussing this he calls people anti Ron Paul. It's silly at best.
 
You are creating a hypothetical scenario, which is great. Don't fund the illegals. I'm on board. Next step....where do these jobs come from in your scenario, and what's the plan if these communities riot?

It doesn't have to be hypothetical if the people supporting Trump rise and demand what's right [such as the Bill of Rights].

Like any other business; start small, build a little wealth, invest, and expand into more and bigger opportunities. I'm not a socialist/communist so I can't advise beyond that. I believe that people should succeed/fail based upon their own merits.

Riots can be dealt with on the local level. If they can't, that's on the local community, not the next state over or the federal government.
 
So ridiculous trash opinion piece. Our elected congress enacted our immigration law. The executive branch enforcing the law and removing criminal aliens is democracy in action. The emergency is warranted due to the level of law breaking.
 
us-debt-forecasts.jpg

Went over 36 couple weeks ago
 
Try to hurry. Please. That way we won't be subject to Flip-Flop-Mitt and MAGA MIGA Trump, just for the sake of "taking one for the team" and "party" unity. Maybe at that point my/our message of Private Contract Rights, Private Property Rights and the Bill of Rights can be heard over the noise again. You guys are waaaaaayyyyyy too f&cking loud lol

I'm not going anywhere.

It's gonna come down to a showdown at some point.

This town ain't big enough for the two of us...

 
What's trash and opinionated about it? Ron Paul, Rand Paul, John Whitehead, Whitney Webb and Mises.org all agree with the OP article.

None of those people are calling Trump a dictator, calling him Hitler, or invoking Nazi history. Literally none of them agree with the OP trash opinion piece. Ron Paul calls immigration a huge mess caused by the Biden administration that has to be addressed. Rand Paul says he supports Trump and an all of the above approach to remove people in our country illegally, just not using the military. Rand Paul agrees some things can be done by executive order like Remain in Mexico, but wants to look at what needs to be done legislatively.

All you do is lie and misrepresent on this forum. Pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
I'm not going anywhere.

It's gonna come down to a showdown at some point.

This town ain't big enough for the two of us...



:tears::up:

I'll be standing with the good, hard working Catholic immigrants, with our "illegal" guns, fighting against you and the Police State.

10 to 1 the Feds with bigger guns and Immunity, and you guys who helped them grow in power, WIN :eek::tears:

At that point, I'll bolt my @ss down to Mexico, put a Mother Mary in my front yard, and pray that you and fed.gov won't follow me down :astonished: :up: :tears:

Then, you guys can have and fight all of those white que-e-rs [your people(?)] on your own lol
 
Last edited:
So ridiculous trash opinion piece. Our elected congress enacted our immigration law. The executive branch enforcing the law and removing criminal aliens is democracy in action. The emergency is warranted due to the level of law breaking.

Libertarians don't think as highly of democracy as you do.
 
All you do is lie and misrepresent on this forum. Pathetic.

That's my point. Calling me an idiot would get someone banned, and admittedly I am a bit of an idiot at times. That doesn't bother me.

But using tactics from Rules for Radicals and calling someone a nazi, racist, anti-Ron Paul is flat out dishonest. If some of those labels stick, someone could lose their job, but mostly it's used as a deceitful tactic to avoid actual discussion. If someone lies and calls me a statists for instance, it is impossible to go on with a discussion until that lie is addressed, IMO. How can you have a honest discussion with someone who lies about another person's character?

This is intentional. Even the most militant minarchist with the weakest understanding of history knows that no society survives a weak border. Yet these people have ended this discussion and have Americans cowering for fear they'll be called a racist. It's disgusting. It's why we are in this mess. Such misrepresenting ends fruitful discussion. And such dishonesty needs to be called out at every occasion, on the forum, in real life, everywhere.
 
Last edited:
But using tactics from Rules for Radicals and calling someone a nazi, racist, anti-Ron Paul is flat out dishonest.

You're the one being dishonest. AF is an open and unabashed white nationalist. And you regularly cheer him on when he pushes that stuff. And we both know he's not the only one here who is.

Nobody's using tactics from Rules for Radicals or resorting to any kind of dishonest ad hominem. If you don't want other people thinking you're part of that crowd, it starts with you distancing yourself from them.
 
That's my point. Calling me an idiot would get someone banned, and admittedly I am a bit of an idiot at times. That doesn't bother me.

But using tactics from Rules for Radicals and calling someone a nazi, racist, anti-Ron Paul is flat out dishonest. If some of those labels stick, someone could lose their job, but mostly it's used as a deceitful tactic to avoid actual discussion. If someone lies and calls me a statists for instance, it is impossible to go on with a discussion until that lie is addressed, IMO. How can you have a honest discussion with someone who lies about my character.

This is intentional. Even the most militant minarchist with the weakest understanding of history knows that no society survives a weak borders. Yet these people have ended this discussion and have Americans cowering for fear they'll be called a racist. It's disgusting. It's why we are in this mess. And such dishonesty needs to be called out at every occasion, on the forum, in real life, everywhere.
If you don't agree with some people you are not libertarian enough or you are considered the real problem in the USA! Got it!
 
Are you thinking there's a limited number of jobs to be had or something?

It's almost like they're clamoring for the fed.gov to come up with "solutions", because they hope that more governments "jobs" will be created. It's like a pattern.
 
It sure feels weird on RPF these days. Stuff that we all were warning others about has or is coming to pass but now some are in favor of it? Will there be applause when "Papers Please" makes a comeback....cuz illegals, ya know? The power of sustained, repetitive propaganda from the black mirrors sure is amazing.

We will see what happens but it's foolish to not at least notice and discuss the historical parallels that should be plain to everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PAF
Back
Top