TheCount
Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2014
- Messages
- 11,736
Maybe read the constitution some time.So our trade with foreign nations falls under the president's authority.
Start with article 1 before you move on to article 2.
Maybe read the constitution some time.So our trade with foreign nations falls under the president's authority.
Maybe read the constitution some time.
Start with article 1 before you move on to article 2.
If it doesn't matter, why did you start out with the (false) assertion that the president is somehow in charge of our trade?I understand the Constitution and so do the 4 dissenting judges in this ruling.
The Constitution isn't a suicide pact.
The president must ensure our country's national security because failure to act in such a case would be tantamount to acquiescence in anarchy and the dissolution of the union.
If it doesn't matter, why did you start out with the (false) assertion that the president is somehow in charge of our trade?
Obviously the other framers felt differently because that's not what they wrote in the constitution.That wasn't my idea. That was Thomas Jefferson.
"The transaction of business with foreign nations is Executive altogether."
The topic of that quote was the appointment of diplomats. The "business" is foreign affairs, not trade.That wasn't my idea. That was Thomas Jefferson.
"The transaction of business with foreign nations is Executive altogether."
Obviously the other framers felt differently because that's not what they wrote in the constitution.
The topic of that quote was the appointment of diplomats. The "business" is foreign affairs, not trade.
![]()
Founders Online: Jefferson’s Opinion on the Powers of the Senate Respecting Dip …
Jefferson’s Opinion on the Powers of the Senate Respecting Diplomatic Appointments, 24 April 1790founders.archives.gov
Maybe read your gpt output's references next time.
Foreign affairs and trade are not the same, no matter how long you make your replies.Foreign affairs include trade with other nations.
These sort of restrictions on foreign trade fall well within the presidents power.
The executive branch has broad authority to "combat unfair trade practices for national security."
They manage foreign policy which includes trade policy granted by the executive branch’s Article 2 "foreign economic policy powers".
The supreme court has ruled that it was a function of the executive branch.
In Curtiss-Wright, Writing for a 7-1 majority Justice Sutherland posited that the National Government’s power in foreign relations is inherent. Consequently, the limits on Congress’s ability to delegate power relating to domestic areas, Justice Sutherland reasoned, did not apply in the area of foreign affairs.
The Founders didn't want a king so they put guard rails in place so that the congress has the power to check the presidents power.
"Big question — will we live under emergency rule or Constitutional rule?" -- Rand Paul
According to Trump? Continuous, never-ending "emergency rule". From the OP article (bold emphasis added):
“Today a Highly Partisan Appeals Court incorrectly said that our Tariffs should be removed, but they know the United States of America will win in the end,” the president said. “If these Tariffs ever went away, it would be a total disaster for the Country.”
Bessent predicts possible national housing emergency declaration
Since entering office, Trump has declared nine national emergencies, allowing him to expand his executive powers to address issues such as immigration and trade. He also declared a “crime” emergency in August to tackle violent crime in Washington.
Obliterated.
Instantly.