Trump to terminate birthright citizenship

[acptulsa]

Try learning:


Idiots.

Another guideline violation.

And where does that say nobody is subject to the laws of the jurisdiction they are in unless and until they get caught?

 

[CCTelander]

Try learning:


Idiots.

A person with just a little knowledge, who doesn't fully comprehend even that which he has, is usually insufferably arrogant about it. Case in point.

 

[Swordsmyth]

You are factually in error. This is, really, a minor point. Just admit your error and save yourself further humiliation.

Originally Posted by angelatc

In the year 1873 the United States Attorney General ruled the word “jurisdiction” under the Fourteenth Amendment to mean, which Justice Gray would recognize in Elk v. Wilkins years later:

The word “jurisdiction” must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment… Aliens, among whom are persons born here and naturalized abroad, dwelling or being in this country, are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States only to a limited extent. Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to them. (14 Op. Atty-Gen. 300.)

http://www.federalistblog.us/2007/09..._jurisdiction/

...

 

[Origanalist]

Another guideline violation.

And where does that say nobody is subject to the laws of the jurisdiction they are in unless and until they get caught?

I'm beginning to wonder if he supports the mission statement.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Another guideline violation.

That is rich coming from you.

And where does that say nobody is subject to the laws of the jurisdiction they are in unless and until they get caught?

It says that even if my argument about oulawry was wrong (it isn't) they still would not be "subject to" "our jurisdiction" according to its meaning in the Constitution.

 

[Swordsmyth]

I'm beginning to wonder if he supports the mission statement.

You started the insults, what is the matter? You can dish it out but you can't take it?

 

[Swordsmyth]

A person with just a little knowledge, who doesn't fully comprehend even that which he has, is usually insufferably arrogant about it. Case in point.

Yes you are.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Good discussion about the 14th amendment (birthright citizenship) by a constitutional scholar.

4-5 minutes starting at 7:37

...

 

[CCTelander]

That is your position.
Take your own advice.

Son, it's very likely that while I was actually spending the vast majority of my free time in dimly lit university law libraries actually studying this stuff ndependently, you were still having your diapers changed by your mother. I certainly don't claim to be any kind of expert. But, judging by some of the opinions you post anyway, I've probably forgotten more on the subjects of the constitution and constitutional law than you'vevyetvlearned. Stop digging.

 

[Origanalist]

You started the insults, what is the matter? You can dish it out but you can't take it?

I can take whatever you think you have boy scout, however, I specifically directed no insult at you. Be careful Junior.

 

[Swordsmyth]

I can take whatever you think you have boy scout, however, I specifically directed no insult at you. Be careful Junior.

If you meant someone else when you said

I'm just glad we have a autistic screeching retard on board, it makes it so much livelier.

Then I apologize to you.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Son, it's very likely that while I was actually spending the vast majority of my free time in dimly lit university law libraries actually studying this stuff ndependently, you were still having your diapers changed by your mother. I certainly don't claim to be any kind of expert. But, judging by some of the opinions you post anyway, I've probably forgotten more on the subjects of the constitution and constitutional law than you'vevyetvlearned. Stop digging.

Education is not a substitute for intelligence.

 

[acptulsa]

If you meant someone else when you said

Then I apologize to you.

If you had even ten percent the legal mind you think you have, you'd see why that makes no difference.

He did not violate guidelines. You did.

Education is not a substitute for intelligence.

And endless arrogant bluster is not a substitute for either--much less both.

 

[CCTelander]

Education is not a substitute for intelligence.

And arrogance is a very poor substitute for wisdom. So is hubris.

 

[Origanalist]

[/

 

[Swordsmyth]

If you had even ten percent the legal mind you think you have, you'd see why that makes no difference.

He did not violate guidelines. You did.



And endless arrogant bluster is not a substitute for either--much less both.

So it wasn't a guideline violation to call somebody a retard?

LOL

 

[acptulsa]

So it wasn't a guideline violation to call somebody a retard?

LOL

He didn't call anyone a retard in this thread.

Anyone who can't see that is a retard.

 

[Swordsmyth]

He didn't call anyone a retard in this thread.

Anyone who can't see that is a retard.

I'm just glad we have a autistic screeching retard on board, it makes it so much livelier.

...

 

[acptulsa]

...

And whose name do you see in his post?

But, of course, you know that. You're just doing what you always do--pure disruption. You turned two pages of rational discourse into six pages of stupid flame war, because you don't want anyone to learn the facts that were being presented.

 

[Swordsmyth]

And whose name do you see in his post?

It doesn't take a name.

But, of course, you know that. You're just doing what you always do--pure disruption. You turned two pages of rational discourse into six pages of stupid flame war, because you don't want anyone to learn the facts that were being presented.

That is what you do but most of this has been a discussion of legal points rather than a flame war.