Trump Supporters Are GW Bush Supporters LARPing As Ron Paul Supporters

[Pauls' Revere]

Sounds like a plan.

@RandPaul Senator Paul,
I hope you are considering a run for The Office of President in 2024. Now is the time to start building a base.
Restore our Freedoms.

 

[Anti Globalist]

My parents were Bush supporters and they did vote for Trump. They have openly said that if they could redo their vote in 00 and 04 they wouldn't have voted for Bush.

 

[Theocrat]

Trump is Swimming in the Swamp

That's funny, because Trump is exposing the deepstate far more effectively than Ron did.

No, he's not. You can stop with the "Trump is playing 3D Chess" bullshit.

 

[Pauls' Revere]

Sounds like a plan.

Is it to early to start the Rand2024 thread?

"I Stand with Rand"?

"Randstanding"? lol

"Join the Randwagon" - LOL

"Randeros" - supporters of Rand

 

[Theocrat]

Inquiring Minds Want to Know

I'm interested in how you came to that conclusion. Before 2016 hardly anyone outside of libertarian circles talked about what goes on behind closed doors.

Sure, Trump might not have intentionally changed the dialogue on foreign policy and backroom dealings. Maybe he didn't mean to obliterate the average American's faith in the MSM. Maybe he was given too much leeway by his handlers and let the cat out of the bag. In any case, kudos. It should make future liberty candidate runs a hell of a lot easier.

What policies or legislation has Trump encouraged Congress to pass regarding safeguards of our privacy from intrusions by any level of federal bureaucracy, which would reveal Trump's commitment to maintain government transparency, similar to what Edward Snowden exposed?

 

[Swordsmyth]

No, he's not. You can stop with the "Trump is playing 3D Chess" bull$#@!.

He is.
And it's not just the 3d chess doing it.
He is doing it directly and has been since he was inaugurated.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Is it to early to start the Rand2024 thread?

"I Stand with Rand"?

"Randstanding"? lol

"Join the Randwagon" - LOL

"Randeros" - supporters of Rand

I think we should wait for him to announce.

 

[Theocrat]

Proof, Not Promises

He is.
And it's not just the 3d chess doing it.
He is doing it directly and has been since he was inaugurated.

What examples or cases of Trump's exposure of the "Deep State" are you referring to? I need citations, not just empty rhetoric from you that "He's doing it," nor any assurances from him (or his staff) that he's going to do it.

And by "exposure," I mean documented evidences that show programs, initiatives, and other means that our privacy has been intruded by our intelligence community, in the same manner that Edward Snowden did when he came out with his information about the NSA, CIA, etc.

 

[Swordsmyth]

What examples or cases of Trump's exposure of the "Deep State" are you referring to? I need citations, not just empty rhetoric from you that "He's doing it," nor any assurances from him (or his staff) that he's going to do it.

And by "exposure," I mean documented evidences that show programs, initiatives, and other means that our privacy has been intruded by our intelligence community, in the same manner that Edward Snowden did when he came out with his information about the NSA, CIA, etc.

His exposure of the FBI/CIA/State Department conspiracy against him and his associates has done much to wake people up about that.

 

[Theocrat]

Trump is the Traitor, Not Snowden

His exposure of the FBI/CIA/State Department conspiracy against him and his associates has done much to wake people up about that.

The general public already knew about collusions amongst the FBI, CIA, and State Department before there was a conspiracy against Donald Trump and his associates, and that knowledge was escalated through Edward Snowden's whistleblowing. Trump hasn't woken anyone up to that, and he should've been exposing our intelligence community from the beginning, not when it was politically expedient for himself.

Nonetheless, Trump thinks Snowden ought to be dealt with harshly, as recorded in the video above. And for what?

 

[Swordsmyth]

The general public already knew about collusions amongst the FBI, CIA, and State Department before there was a conspiracy against Donald Trump and his associates, and that knowledge was escalated through Edward Snowden's whistleblowing. Trump hasn't woken anyone up to that, and he should've been exposing our intelligence community from the beginning, not when it was politically expedient for himself.

Nonetheless, Trump thinks Snowden ought to be dealt with harshly, as recorded in the video above. And for what?

Many people were unaware of just how deep, wide and rotten the deepstate swamp was, far less are unaware now.
It's the same with the Fake News MSM which Trump has exposed to many of those who were asleep.

Trump has been talking about draining the swamp all along and he is starting by exposing it.

 

[Theocrat]

Trump is Fake News

Many people were unaware of just how deep, wide and rotten the deepstate swamp was, far less are unaware now.
It's the same with the Fake News MSM which Trump has exposed to many of those who were asleep.

Trump has been talking about draining the swamp all along and he is starting by exposing it.

You can't call someone like Edward Snowden "a total traitor," but then turn around and claim you're going to "drain the swamp." The two sentiments are simply contradictory.

 

[Pauls' Revere]

I think we should wait for him to announce.

Is it to early for him/his campaign to gather a list of supporters?

 

[Swordsmyth]

You can't call someone like Edward Snowden "a total traitor," but then turn around and claim you're going to "drain the swamp." The two sentiments are simply contradictory.

That is not necessarily true, even if we don't go into the possibility that Snowden only did us a favor because it was also useful to the CIA in their turf war with the NSA.
You can be wrong about Snowden and still be right about many other parts of the swamp.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Is it to early for him/his campaign to gather a list of supporters?

It's never too early for that.

 

[RonZeplin]

Bushbot Marxist Trumpkins

some people just want to watch the world burn.

"The Government will pay for it" ~Donald J. Trump.

 

[Pauls' Revere]

It's never too early for that.

Senator Paul,

Please consider a run for the White House in 2024. Meanwhile, can your office start a database/list of supporters for a campaign in 2024? Also, when is the earliest you could accept contributions for such a campaign?

 

[Theocrat]

Bravery and Integrity Breed the Same

That is not necessarily true, even if we don't go into the possibility that Snowden only did us a favor because it was also useful to the CIA in their turf war with the NSA.
You can be wrong about Snowden and still be right about many other parts of the swamp.

You're missing the point, Swordsmyth. The fact that Trump is on the wrong side of the Snowden controversy indicates that he's not serious about government transparency, to begin with (except when it's expedient for himself, because he's an egotistical person). Trump is supposed to be encouraging more "Edward Snowdens," especially if he wants the "Swamp Things" to come clamoring out of the swamp, naked for who they truly are.

And I think it's laughable that you believe Trump has exposed "the swamp." Just look at whom he surrounds himself with in his administration (especially in terms of national security and foreign policy), and you'll see that they fit quite nicely in "the swamp."

 

[Swordsmyth]

Senator Paul,

Please consider a run for the White House in 2024. Meanwhile, can your office start a database/list of supporters for a campaign in 2024? Also, when is the earliest you could accept contributions for such a campaign?

If he is going to run he needs to start getting ready now.

 

[Swordsmyth]

You're missing the point, Swordsmyth. The fact that Trump is on the wrong side of the Snowden controversy indicates that he's not serious about government transparency, to begin with (except when it's expedient for himself, because he's an egotistical person). Trump is supposed to be encouraging more "Edward Snowdens," especially if he wants the "Swamp Things" to come clamoring out of the swamp, naked for who they truly are.

And I think it's laughable that you believe Trump has exposed "the swamp." Just look at whom he surrounds himself with in his administration (especially in terms of national security and foreign policy), and you'll see that they fit quite nicely in "the swamp."

Time will tell.

I'm not going to change your mind and you won't change mine, only Trump's actions for the next 5 years will.