Shooter at DC Navy yard
- Thread starter tod evans
- Start date
Root
Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2011
- Messages
- 3,005
Dianne
Account Closed
- Joined
- May 29, 2007
- Messages
- 6,995
lmao .... I am suspicious about this, however, now that I heard law enforcement at the site is the same law enforcement group from the alleged Boston bombing.
enhanced_deficit
Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2013
- Messages
- 28,575
He needs to stay clear of invoking "sons he could have had". Yet better he should let someone else whose name is not tarnished with drone war crimes against innocent children do the speaking.
puppetmaster
Member
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 6,658
The prez? Really?
green73
Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
- Messages
- 13,670
shelter in place. We'll be ransacking your homes momentarily, and be sure to be in a prone position when we bust in...
standby.
fisharmor
Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2008
- Messages
- 12,455
2young2vote
Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2007
- Messages
- 1,852
Another day another shooting. Murder, among other things, is what happens when people don't have a strong moral foundation. Where do people get strong moral foundations in modern society? Family and Church, both of which have been attacked by government.
ClydeCoulter
Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
- Messages
- 11,108
I hope lots of video from MSM and others are being captured as well. (Have to catch you later on rep, too soon yet
)
donnay
Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
- Messages
- 42,534
Picture posted from a twitter account posted on the US News page. People where shuffled to the underground parking garage. IMHO, those people do not looked terrified--they look like they're at a casual social gathering.
Source:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/
Source:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/
Last edited:
Happens all too often and people lose interest in that lol. ... just like gang shootings... happen too often to really make news.
GunnyFreedom
Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 32,882
Y'all gonna hate me for this, but I suspect this one is probably a legitimate jihadist. Largely because I remember this story that came out a few days ago, and it lines up with this guy:
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/...a-calls-for-attacks-inside-united-states?lite
who the US doesn't control, but whose friends Obama wanted to help in Syria. The strike plan falls apart, #1 Al Qaeda gets pissed and says "attack," and 3 days later, we get this.
The pieces fit, but not so perfect like it was constructed. The timelines add up, and the players are high on our drone target list.
I'm as suspicious as anybody and suspected something might happen to encourage the attack on Syria, but this doesn't add up to that. A false flag would have had the perp some kind of Syrian nationalist responding to Assad. This appears to be a jihadist responding to al-Zawahri -- totally counterproductive to a Syrian invasion. If anything, this will make us even LESS likely to bomb Syria to "help the guys who just shot up the DC Navy Yard." It's not an Assad subterfuge either. Assad does not have al-Zawahri under his thumb any more than we do.
Just looking at what's going down, I have a higher confidence than this is just an AQ patsy than I have had on any 'official line' on anything in the last 13 years.
That broken clock had to be right eventually.
Be on the lookout for Congress to introduce "PATRIOT IV - THE FINAL SUBJUGATION ACT" or some such atrocity.
Of course, a rational person says al-Zawahri just called for the attacks publically and out in the open. No oppressive spy regime was necessary to see that one coming.
Cui bono? If we were looking for a false flag to encourage the Syria attack, it sure as hell wouldn't be coming from al-Zawahri!
Of course, the correct response would be to snatch the two left alive up , determine if they were acting in response to al-Zawahri or not, and if so, dispatch a Marque on al-Zawahri and let some enterprising international free agents deliver him to stand trial.
Instead, the idiot in chief is probably going to willy-nilly invade another half dozen unrelated Countries and create a dozen more al-Zawahris perpetuating this cycle to justify further MIC expenditures.
Our response will be 180° wrong, and we are going to run out and make as many new enemies as we can behind this, which is horrible. Overlooking all of that for the moment, this as an indy-cell AQ attack actually passes the sniff-test.
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/...a-calls-for-attacks-inside-united-states?lite
who the US doesn't control, but whose friends Obama wanted to help in Syria. The strike plan falls apart, #1 Al Qaeda gets pissed and says "attack," and 3 days later, we get this.
The pieces fit, but not so perfect like it was constructed. The timelines add up, and the players are high on our drone target list.
I'm as suspicious as anybody and suspected something might happen to encourage the attack on Syria, but this doesn't add up to that. A false flag would have had the perp some kind of Syrian nationalist responding to Assad. This appears to be a jihadist responding to al-Zawahri -- totally counterproductive to a Syrian invasion. If anything, this will make us even LESS likely to bomb Syria to "help the guys who just shot up the DC Navy Yard." It's not an Assad subterfuge either. Assad does not have al-Zawahri under his thumb any more than we do.
Just looking at what's going down, I have a higher confidence than this is just an AQ patsy than I have had on any 'official line' on anything in the last 13 years.
That broken clock had to be right eventually.
Be on the lookout for Congress to introduce "PATRIOT IV - THE FINAL SUBJUGATION ACT" or some such atrocity.
Of course, a rational person says al-Zawahri just called for the attacks publically and out in the open. No oppressive spy regime was necessary to see that one coming.
Cui bono? If we were looking for a false flag to encourage the Syria attack, it sure as hell wouldn't be coming from al-Zawahri!
Of course, the correct response would be to snatch the two left alive up , determine if they were acting in response to al-Zawahri or not, and if so, dispatch a Marque on al-Zawahri and let some enterprising international free agents deliver him to stand trial.
Instead, the idiot in chief is probably going to willy-nilly invade another half dozen unrelated Countries and create a dozen more al-Zawahris perpetuating this cycle to justify further MIC expenditures.
Our response will be 180° wrong, and we are going to run out and make as many new enemies as we can behind this, which is horrible. Overlooking all of that for the moment, this as an indy-cell AQ attack actually passes the sniff-test.
Similar threads
