ZanZibar
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2011
- Messages
- 3,872
What is "compromising" about politically organizing and appealing to specific sectors of society?Gee, I thought Ron was a man of uncompromising principles....

What is "compromising" about politically organizing and appealing to specific sectors of society?Gee, I thought Ron was a man of uncompromising principles....
how do you know what they mean?
What is "compromising" about politically organizing and appealing to specific sectors of society?![]()
I eagerly await "Whites for Ron Paul."
Some of the Spanish in this thread is absolutely awful, by the way.
What's the RevPAC up to these days? Super secret project?
Gee, I thought Ron was a man of uncompromising principles....
^Exactly. Forming groups and favoring groups are entirely different scenarios.
^Exactly. Forming groups and favoring groups are entirely different scenarios.
So you are going to begin "Whites for Ron"?
This remains ridiculous. The campaign is free to do it, and no one is saying they aren't. Some folks, though, are pretty damned disappointed that the same stupid rush to label issues as only being really important to certain groups is now a front-and-center part of Ron's campaign. It's pandering. It's also pretty insulting to think that Ron's core issues would not be enough to convince your average "Hispanic" voter, so better marketing is necessary. Others will disagree. To each their own.
This is a massive turnoff. I doubt I'm all alone on this.
I eagerly await "Whites for Ron Paul."
Individuals who happen share a common culture, background, origin, tradition, and values are now considered "collectivist"?You call them 'specific sectors', I call them collectivist groups.
You could replace hispanic with any group. Quite frankly, this idea that we can just convey the message and it will all work out is not a reality. Winning elections requires some political marketing. It doesn't mean that you have to compromise your principles but you do need to do some traditional campaign things.
Individuals who happen share a common culture, background, origin, tradition, and values are now considered "collectivist"?![]()
You make a good point.
Look, it doesn't matter what you label it, or how greatly it helps the campaign. The fact is that Ron Paul has spoken out several times about categorizing people based on race/gender/ect. To suggest that this is on the same level as Veterans or Youth for Ron Paul is preposterous.
This is honestly the first time in my life that I have been disappointed by Ron. If he can compromise his principles for votes, then what might he compromise when the weight of the world is on his shoulders? I suppose nobody's perfect... but still.
Where was all this hate when people were making "women for Ron Paul" threads?