Ron Paul and Economics, on National Review

[theseus51]

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Y2Q5MDM2NzZkNzU5ZDEwYTI3ODg5YjY2YWZlMjFkYTc=

Not entirely positive, but 80% positive.

 

[Crickett]

Terrific article...but the title did not need that byline AT ALL.

 

[Primbs]

It is progress.

 

[JohnM]

Good article.

The line that struck me was "For many conservatives, what makes Paul seem like a nut is his absolute opposition to the war in Iraq ..."

What can one say? I'm speechless.

 

[chadism]

I think Luskin actually secretly agrees with Paul on the war, but he's trying to make a diplomatic case to the NRO types...

GREAT article. I wrote hime an email. I'm NOT suggesting that everyone do the same though.

 

[AlbemarleNC0003]

Terrific article...but the title did not need that byline AT ALL.

He wrote me back.

My editor wrote that headline without my knowledge or consent. You should complain at [email protected].
Donald L. Luskin

Chief Investment Officer, Trend Macrolytics LLC

 

[Bilgefisher]

It was a great article.

 

[angrydragon]

Donald Luskin's excellent piece at NRO had a headline saying that, of course, Ron Paul cannot win. Mr. Luskin responds to Andrew Borzone: "My editor wrote that headline without my knowledge or consent."

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/018835.html

 

[Crickett]

He wrote me back.

That is SO hysterical!!! Good line for an excuse! lololol..

 

[stewie3128]

I think that article can do more for us in converting the base than most others: It's really a love letter to Ron Paul, but it's presented as a critique.

Awesome.

 

[unconsious767]

On his wiki it says:

On January 22, 2008, Luskin endorsed Ron Paul for president

That's today!

 

[Commander Yo]

+1