Rand Paul dismisses Ann Coulter on immigration

[affa]

All they need is a majority of the White vote. Want to know how to do that ? Say you'll end affirmative action and get tough on all immigration, not just illegal immigration. If any Republican ran on that platform they would win in a landslide. Many working class democrats would vote Republican.

There's so much wrong with this post.

 

[eating_nachos]

Talk about confirmation bias. Just because you want badly to deport illegal immigrants does not make it popular opinion. Sorry.

h ttp://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2013/03/21-immigration-survey-jones-dionne-galston

45% of Americans say the Republican parties position on immigration has hurt them in recent elections.

More than 6-in-10 (63%) Americans agree that the immigration system should deal with immigrants who are currently living in the U.S. illegally by allowing them a way to become citizens, provided they meet certain requirements. Less than 1-in-5 (14%) say they should be permitted to become permanent legal residents but not citizens, while approximately 1-in-5 (21%) agree that they should be identified and deported.

More than 7-in-10 (71%) Democrats, nearly two-thirds (64%) of independents, and a majority (53%) of Republicans favor an earned path to citizenship

As a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, Brookings describes itself as independent and non-partisan. A recent study examining think tank employee donations from 2003 to 2010 showed that 97.6% of Brookings's employees' political donations went to Democrats and described the think tank as "liberal."





Please tell us more about our confirmation bias.

 

[seapilot]

Illegals cant vote but their kids can. Anchor babies will vote for their parents to become citizens or to end the fear of deportation.

Its impossible to round up 11 million illegals, the question is how did they become illegals in the first place. The answer is a more socialistic government sticking their noses where it did not belong. Back in the 40s and 50s there were temporary worker visas for migrant workers. They lived on the farms while they worked there. The conditions were not great living in tin roof shacks without running water. Then the govt stepped in and told the farmers to make things better or they would be fined. Well they stopped sponsoring the work visas and hiring them under the table. Then the flood of anyone could work without a visa and people hired them than deal with big gov fines and codes.

Bring back the temporary work visas that have a sponsor. Get rid of entitlements for anyone without one to start with. No more anchor babies. Apply for a permanent work visa after 10 years on a temporary one. No Amnesty. Naturalization requirements stay the same, marry a citizen or go through a PITA application bureaucratic nightmare process like everyone else.

A lot of Latin countries lean heavily toward socialism because there is a minority wealthy elite and a huge poor class. Without the socialism they could not control the poor classes. Education is the key to bring Latinos to liberty. Most Latin countries fought for Liberty from Spain so there is a strong nationalism for it, but most of them do not understand it. If they understood it would give them more opportunity over time than socialism that keeps them poor, many I believe would embrace it.

 

[whoisjohngalt]

As a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, Brookings describes itself as independent and non-partisan. A recent study examining think tank employee donations from 2003 to 2010 showed that 97.6% of Brookings's employees' political donations went to Democrats and described the think tank as "liberal."

PPP is admittedly Democratic yet they have an outstanding track record. You are employing a fallacy called "ad hominem". Therefore, we don't need to address your argument as its a logical fallacy. If you would like, you can attempt to prove your point again by showing that the Brooking's has a history of being inaccurate with their polling data. I'll wait...

 

[eating_nachos]

PPP is admittedly Democratic yet they have an outstanding track record. You are employing a fallacy called "ad hominem". Therefore, we don't need to address your argument as its a logical fallacy. If you would like, you can attempt to prove your point again by showing that the Brooking's has a history of being inaccurate with their polling data. I'll wait...

You're so adorable.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/201...ve-illegal-immigrants-should-be-deported?lite

 

[abacabb]

You're so adorable.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/201...ve-illegal-immigrants-should-be-deported?lite

"Only 5 percent believe all illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay in the United States legally, and 31 percent want most illegal immigrants to stay."

Only snooty whites and 1st generation Americans support immigration. Everyone else hates it and opposing it certainly is a winning issue, especially in a Repub primary.

But, the NWO wants to conquer America by destroying its voting base.

 

[BlackTerrel]

Meanwhile, a 3-to-1 margin of Hispanics say that they'd lean towards suffocating tax rates if it also meant cushier entitlement benefits, an expansion of the government dependency racket, more funding for Washington's marble-coated, bureaucratic castles and palaces, and the ever-forward march of the Messianic state.

And why wouldn't they?

Most of the parasites being imported from abroad either don't pay a single dime in estate, capital gains, or income taxes or are off the grid altogether. In other words, they've got not a lot of change to spare, chow down to their heart's delight at the buffet of taxpayer giveaways, or find ways to exploit loopholes as undocumented migrants in order to get their slice of the pie.

If you're wheeled into an emergency room, health care providers can't inquire into your citizenship status, and taxpayers are footing the bill for your overnight booking and X-Rays if you don't have insurance.

Even if you made a dash for it across open fields, burrowed under tunnels, and climbed the gates to get here, you can qualify for food stamps if you have anchor babies or eligible dependents in the household - and they can also get a free education on the public dime, their tuition reimbursed, and maybe even a low-income housing subsidy thrown into the mix.

If illegals are barred from leeching off taxpayers, why do so many voter-approved referendums that reassert precisely that get smacked down by the courts under the 14th amendment (which required a military junta pointing bayonets at the heads of recalcitrant Southerners as a prerequisite for ratification)?

Hispanics, as a whole, have few qualms with the unbridled mass murder of more than 2,000 infants every day in the womb - which, by the way, over a one-year period, is higher than the annual death toll for Jews exterminated in the Third Reich's genocidal onslaught. They have few qualms with the moral abomination that is same-sex marriage, as long as they can cash in at the welfare line.

Bush, who was one of the main spokesmen for opening up the floodgates at the border, only mustered up 40 percent of the Hispanic vote tops, and that was after he pivoted almost entirely to the Democratic side. McCain, too, suffered a bitter defeat at the polls. And Mitt Romney, for Heaven's sake, championed the same "guest worker" programs that Rand does - even going so far to say that engineering and science degrees for intellectually gifted illegals should be paper-clipped to a green card. He only garnered 20 percent of the Hispanic vote.

When are Republicans going to learn that Hispandering is the lost cause of the century, and that the only way to save themselves from their own demographic demise is to impose a strict immigration moratorium - something Rand Paul screamed from the mountaintops only three or four years ago, back in the days when he said we should have helicopter stations and electric minefields at the border?

Please don't sell out on us, Rand. You have everything to lose by doing so. Put this site on your RSS feed, crack those knuckles, and start studying like a madman.

Parasites? Racist trolls are racist.

 

[eating_nachos]

Parasites? Racist trolls are racist.

Other than the parasite comment can you point out anything factually wrong with what he wrote?

 

[BarryDonegan]

Why would someone who fled a communist country to come to America vote Democrat? (answer is because Republicans seem like they want to put them in jail. if they didn't, it's pretty obvious they'd be for capitalism and the party of capitalism)

 

[affa]

Other than the parasite comment can you point out anything factually wrong with what he wrote?

I had no idea it was a fact that if someone is Hispanic they've got "few qualms" about the "mass murder of infants in the womb".

I also had no idea it was a fact that if someone was is Hispanic they "few qualms" with the "moral abomination that is same-sex marriage, as long as they can cash in at the welfare line."

Oh wait, it says "as a whole" so I guess that opts them out from blatantly trying to stereotype an entire race by associating them with moral positions the author finds abhorrent? Or...

Heck, I didn't even know same sex marriage WAS a "moral abomination", and I'm not even Hispanic.

It's a racist garbage post from start to finish. And homophobic while we're at it.

 

[spladle]

Other than the parasite comment can you point out anything factually wrong with what he wrote?

Something needn't be factually wrong to be morally repugnant.

 

[KrokHead]

"Only 5 percent believe all illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay in the United States legally, and 31 percent want most illegal immigrants to stay."

Only snooty whites and 1st generation Americans support immigration. Everyone else hates it and opposing it certainly is a winning issue, especially in a Repub primary.

But, the NWO wants to conquer America by destroying its voting base.

I think immigration has become too taboo, and I don't think you can run on an anti-immigration platform anymore no matter what majority agrees with it. Being anti-immigration is just seen as racist, and fiscal conservatism will solve most problems potentially created by immigration in the first place.

 

[BlackTerrel]

Other than the parasite comment can you point out anything factually wrong with what he wrote?

Other than the fact that he was racist... you don't get to pick and choose pieces.

 

[eating_nachos]

Other than the fact that he was racist... you don't get to pick and choose pieces.

Short: You can't.

 

[Origanalist]

Short: You can't.

I would say this part of it is not correct;

Hispanics, as a whole, have few qualms with the unbridled mass murder of more than 2,000 infants every day in the womb - which, by the way, over a one-year period, is higher than the annual death toll for Jews exterminated in the Third Reich's genocidal onslaught. They have few qualms with the moral abomination that is same-sex marriage, as long as they can cash in at the welfare line.

 

[eating_nachos]

I would say this part of it is not correct;

Which part is wrong?

 

[spladle]

Which part is wrong?

I would say this part of it is not correct;

Hispanics, as a whole, have few qualms with the unbridled mass murder of more than 2,000 infants every day in the womb - which, by the way, over a one-year period, is higher than the annual death toll for Jews exterminated in the Third Reich's genocidal onslaught. They have few qualms with the moral abomination that is same-sex marriage, as long as they can cash in at the welfare line.

 

[eating_nachos]

I would say this part of it is not correct;

The majority of Hispanics are pro-choice and pro-ssm.

 

[Origanalist]

The majority of Hispanics are pro-choice and pro-ssm.

I guess I just know the minority Hispanics.

 

[Origanalist]

Something needn't be factually wrong to be morally repugnant.

Examples please.