GunnyFreedom
Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 32,882
didn't militia groups from across the country go to Bundy's Ranch?...
You mean where they were invited and wanted?
didn't militia groups from across the country go to Bundy's Ranch?...
don't you think that by 'taking' over a deserted vistor center with open doors, is now getting much needed and embarrassing media attention towards the Feds, is actually working. Its now all over the cable news and internet....bearing fruit my friend. Stay tuned, and keep your powder dry.
You think it was too cold in Southern Nevada so they had to go invade Eastern Oregon? 50° highs are too cold so let's go where the highs are in the 20's?
don't you think that by 'taking' over a deserted vistor center with open doors, is now getting much needed and embarrassing media attention towards the Feds, is actually working. Its now all over the cable news and internet....bearing fruit my friend. Stay tuned, and keep your powder dry.
I have to admit that I've not heard anything about the Hammonds situation until the militia took over a hut.
Of course I'll do my homework on the issue and find out what led up to this, while most of America will hear about it for the first time and decide they're terrorists because media.
Yeah and instead of the headline being, "Hammons fight unjust sentencing" etc... the headline is "Armed Militia Takes Over Federal Building!" Driving the narrative that serves TPTB and away from the Hammons plight.
thats why i said ''dunno''...
i understand why some milita troopers didn't go....too 'hot' in Oregon?....lol..
If I were the Hammond's I would think it were great that another entity was taking up my cause. On the outside they say "Oh we plan to turn ourselves in and do our time" but then all the attention is brought to the issue and they were compliant and not involved.
soo, what you're saying is, that in the upcoming negotiations with the Feds, the 2 hammonds that were violated by the government, will not be part of the negotiations to perhaps dismiss the charges?...will see, but i'm thinking it will.
That's not what they said. They specifically told the Bundy's to stay out of it. All fedgov asked of them was to stay quiet, but they didn't stay quiet, they actively told the Bundy's to stay out. Plus the actual militia groups in Oregon likewise do not approve.
Throughout the 200+ year history of the United States, whenever an armed group demands that the US release prisoners, the US inevitably makes those prisoners lives more miserable than they already were. The US has never once in all of our history ceded to such demands. The only time we have released prisoners was to secure the release of hostages ala Bowe Bergdahl.
some people play checkers, while others play chess.
i guess we will have to wait and see if this OP bears fruit.
That's not what they said. They specifically told the Bundy's to stay out of it. All fedgov asked of them was to stay quiet, but they didn't stay quiet, they actively told the Bundy's to stay out. Plus the actual militia groups in Oregon likewise do not approve.
will shall see...btw, this mission is not in Iraq.
So they telling Bundy's to stay out exonerates them from any wrongdoing associated with the situation.
You mean where they were invited and wanted?
You don't get to make that assumption, and neither does Ammon Bundy. if ANYONE gets to make that assumption, it's the OREGON militias.
So the militias should organize and have the heads of the militias get together for meetings to make decisions.You don't get to make that assumption, and neither does Ammon Bundy. if ANYONE gets to make that assumption, it's the OREGON militias.
i think we're getting past the 'invite' stage...shits getting real more and more everyday...agreed?
so, when something as disgusting as this Hammond case is concerned, someone has to send invitations in all future actions otherwise you're on your own...nice to know...