GunnyFreedom
Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 32,882
Gunny lives too far away. Not his fault.
I'm citing the guy who lives in Oregon, and who participated in Bundy Ranch and who participated in Sugar Pines Mine.
Gunny lives too far away. Not his fault.
Opposition to Ammon Bundy does not imply not giving a shit about the Hammonds. Logic, you should try it.
You tote a rifle on my property without my permission and you are going to find yourself missing half your grey matter.
Constitutionally, a militia could only operate out of state if called into the actual service of the United States. You might argue there is also provision if necessary to repel an invasion ....
When you are a militia that claims Constitutional protections, you are also bound by Constitutional restrictions.
This is what's pissing me off. It's all going to devolve into a bunch "racism" "white people are blah blah blah " arguments, instead of covering the government's persecution of people they want to steal property from.
Look at the governments response when they decided to set fires on a warm, dry day after the local weather department advised against it, and ranchers begged them not to! The fire spread to several private properties destroying property, fences, and killing animals.
Logic...thats a good one.
frankly, if you don't like the BLM, then why are so-called miltias doing everything they can to make sure this Hammond issue is swept under the rug?
Which begs the questions: Who are they? How does one "vet" a militia? Is there any historical background on said militia? Do we even know if they are 'legit'? Has it been established that they have a history, etc.?
Which begs the questions: Who are they? How does one "vet" a militia? Is there any historical background on said militia? Do we even know if they are 'legit'? Has it been established that they have a history, etc.?
I respect State sovereignty. Oregon didn't want them. That should be enough. But you just go on and invent bullshit you want me to believe because it makes it easier to hate your strawman.
you have to get permission from OathKeepers. They have a list.
even if the cancer is spreading...got it.
the miltia group IS NOT on Hammond property as we speak, they are on FEDERAL LAND. Harney county is 75% owned by the FEDS...
State Sovreignty?....even on Federal Land?
The States have sovereignty within their borders, even over federal land.
ok.
bottomline for me is i'm very glad someone is doing 'something' to get this issue up front.
there are plenty of well known and respected militia groups in Oregon with a solid history.
ok.
bottomline for me is i'm very glad someone is doing 'something' to get this issue up front.
I'm sure there are. What I'm getting at, is whether the out of state militia (in question) is legit. You know, are we sure it's not a false flag issue? What is known about the out of state militia?
The same could be said for what you're saying. You're saying if Oregon doesn't want them to bad because Federal.....
That sounds a bit like ol' honest Abe.
The love of "doing something" is the root of all kinds of evil.