One out of about every twelve newborns in the United States is an anchor baby

So if the taxpayer doesn't want to do that, then the taxpayer should stop doing it. We offer free goods and services and then get cranky because people take us up on the offer. Who is to blame in that scenario?

The government elites are to blame, and this is why Trump is polling so high. He's the first candidate to openly take them on and challenge the New World Order mass migration plan.
 
“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”

Unless your a dirty filthy fuckin' Mexican. We already fucked up by letting Chinks into this country. And those Gott-damned Micks.
 
The government elites are to blame, and this is why Trump is polling so high. He's the first candidate to openly take them on and challenge the New World Order mass migration plan.

This mass migration?

FT_15.07.23_UnauthImmigrants.png
 
Again, because I said it in another thread, if your retirement expectation is based on Social Security you have only yourself to blame. It's not the "illegals" that stole your retirement from you it is YOUR government. And YOUR SELF that believed that your government would secure you.

Average hourly wage in Mexico is $2.49. Average hourly wage in the U.S. is $24.99. That's 10 times earning capacity. If Canadians would pay me $249 an hour I'd be damned sure to make my way across the border and send money home to my family. And sock some away for retirement.

Well sorry for not stand up to the federal government, you want do lead the charge?
 
“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”

Unless your a dirty filthy fuckin' Mexican. We already fucked up by letting Chinks into this country. And those Gott-damned Micks.

So a poem written in 1886 by a socialist should dictate immigration/preservation of Liberty?

We value liberty more then the lies of immigration. You want invite the world to your house? Great!, you are going to deal with the fallout.
 
So a poem written in 1886 by a socialist should dictate immigration/preservation of Liberty?

We value liberty more then the lies of immigration. You want invite the world to your house? Great!, you are going to deal with the fallout.

But you don't value liberty. Not one bit.
 
But you don't value liberty. Not one bit.

No I do, so much so I am willing to protect it from subversion by people taking self defeating positions, stances and views when it comes to culture and immigration.

Also the "stormfront" comment is really low class. But hey when in doubt scream "racism" and hope the opposition shuts up really does show you for what you are.
 
Where did my retirement benefits go?

The huge number of foreign children born on U.S. soil– roughly 340,000 per year— is also an economic imposition on Americans, who pay taxes to help raise, feed, and educate those children of illegal migrants.

 

Yes it is, and what I said is true. Whites did found the nation, and a vast majority of culture. The only group that really values Liberty and have impalement it into their culture is the people that discovered natural law and rightful liberty which is Anglo Saxons.

The whole screaming "racism" tactic no long works, we are done with losing to weaker people, failed ideas, and lesser cultures all in the name of saving face and having everything we have been given and every will be stolen from us under the lie of "equality".
 
So a poem written in 1886 by a socialist should dictate immigration/preservation of Liberty?

We value liberty more then the lies of immigration. You want invite the world to your house? Great!, you are going to deal with the fallout.

Anyone arguing that denying people their basic rights of movement and association somehow protects liberty is like saying the only way to protect the Constitution is to declare martial law. It doesn't make sense, and is, frankly, quite stupid. Nationalism isn't liberty, denying freedoms base don nationalism isn't liberty. It is statism.

Bring on the immigrants I say. They literally have as much a right to be here as your or I.
 
Yes it is, and what I said is true. Whites did found the nation, and a vast majority of culture. The only group that really values Liberty and have impalement it into their culture is the people that discovered natural law and rightful liberty which is Anglo Saxons.

The whole screaming "racism" tactic no long works, we are done with losing to weaker people, failed ideas, and lesser cultures all in the name of saving face and having everything we have been given and every will be stolen from us under the lie of "equality".


It isn't screaming racism when it is a fact that your argument is Grade A racist bullsh*t. Consider that the core ideas of human liberty as developed in Europe come from Christianity, which comes out of the Middle East and is full of Semitic values and beliefs. That alone overthrows the idea that it developed out of Anglo-Saxon beliefs.

Further, the idea that no other countries have developed similar concepts of human liberty is quite honestly an astound display of ignorance and a lack of education and study about other cultures. For example, I've found nothing more anarchist that the writings of Lao Tzu of China, who was born in 604 BC, long before any ideas of liberty or freedom developed in Europe. http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/josh-anarchism-and-taoism
 
Anyone arguing that denying people their basic rights of movement and association somehow protects liberty is like saying the only way to protect the Constitution is to declare martial law. It doesn't make sense, and is, frankly, quite stupid. Nationalism isn't liberty, denying freedoms base don nationalism isn't liberty. It is statism.

Bring on the immigrants I say. They literally have as much a right to be here as your or I.

Last time I checked the USA is already 100%+ over filled.
 
On the subject of the OP's first line "Where did my retirement benefits go?"

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/29/how-immigrants-will-save-social-security.html

How Immigrants Will Save Social Security

Illegal immigrants have already paid about $1 trillion into social security. And that’s helping the system stay afloat.

Contrary to the myth advanced by opponents of reform that illegal immigrants don’t contribute their fair share in taxes, and drain government benefits, the reality is that undocumented workers are helping to keep the social security trust fund in the black. They do this because they are paying into the system typically with false social security numbers, which means they will never collect benefits. Their money, often collected for many years, helps keep the system afloat and benefits flowing to aging baby boomers.<snip>

This is not an insignificant amount of money. When payroll contributions cannot be credited to a verifiable number, they go into what’s called the “Earnings Suspense File.” A study that was done last year by the Center for American Progress (CAP), a liberal think tank, found that this file is estimated to have accumulated one trillion dollars worth of tax contributions.

Not all of that “unmatched money” is from illegal workers, says Marshall Fitz with CAP, but he felt comfortable saying, “A significant portion of that suspense file has been funded through undocumented workers who currently will never see those benefits.

Here’s how the math works. Five percent of the U.S. work force is undocumented, which is some 8.1 million people. Thirty-eight percent of the 8.1 million pay social security taxes, which comes to roughly $12 billion a year, according to CAP estimates. That’s a pretty nice cushion for a graying America.

Stephen Goss, chief actuary for the Social Security Administration, told the Daily Beast, “Even as it stands under current policy, unauthorized immigrants contribute positively to the financing of social security not only in terms of their own contributions, but in the succeeding generations when they have children on our soil that are citizens from day one.”

And if illegal, they are not eligible to collect any of it.
 
Anyone arguing that denying people their basic rights of movement and association somehow protects liberty is like saying the only way to protect the Constitution is to declare martial law. It doesn't make sense, and is, frankly, quite stupid. Nationalism isn't liberty, denying freedoms base don nationalism isn't liberty. It is statism.

Bring on the immigrants I say. They literally have as much a right to be here as your or I.

You do not nor does anyone have the right to trespass, but nothing. No you just go around thinking anyone who wants to protect what is their is some how a statist, not wanting to be robbed of your nation, culture, and future is not "statism" its self preservation.

The fact you believe is funny and sad. No, they do not have a right to be here. If you think that you are destroying the very foundation of private property, national sovereignty, and the foundation for Liberty.

Since your view harms and effects immigration reductionist more then it effects you, we get a bigger say, and we say "NO". You want to the world to flood in? Great, it can flood into your home and you suffer the costs.
 
It isn't screaming racism when it is a fact that your argument is Grade A racist bullsh*t. Consider that the core ideas of human liberty as developed in Europe come from Christianity, which comes out of the Middle East and is full of Semitic values and beliefs. That alone overthrows the idea that it developed out of Anglo-Saxon beliefs.

You can scream "raciest" all you want, it no longer has any effect.

Oh here we go with this nonsense. The core ideas are a foundation, we built the damn house. WE created the end result/the completed version.

Further, the idea that no other countries have developed similar concepts of human liberty is quite honestly an astound display of ignorance and a lack of education and study about other cultures. For example, I've found nothing more anarchist that the writings of Lao Tzu of China, who was born in 604 BC, long before any ideas of liberty or freedom developed in Europe. http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/josh-anarchism-and-taoism

How many of them are founded on it?

How many of them implement laws and systems based on it?

How many have their entire reason for existence based on it?

How many?
 
Back
Top