One out of about every twelve newborns in the United States is an anchor baby

On the subject of the OP's first line "Where did my retirement benefits go?"

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/29/how-immigrants-will-save-social-security.html



And if illegal, they are not eligible to collect any of it.


They still take out far more then they put in, and SS is a damn [h=3]Ponzi scheme, it is going to collapse, its best to end it now before things get out of control. But its great to..[/h]
Its great to see you favor flooding the nation to the point we lose political control over our elections all in the name of funding a scam...Really does show where you stand on the issues.
 
Last time I checked the USA is already 100%+ over filled.

I do not see any benefit from adding 100,000,000 new people in the next 35 plus years...Let alone 100,000,000 people that vote for statism/leftist a majority if the time.

Maybe we should act and vote in OUR best interests and not that of people that want to destroy us..Just an idea.
 
Back in the 50's and 60's it was "YANQUI GO HOME!!!". Now the much more appropriate sign would be more like, "LATINO GO HOME!!!!".

Interesting how the NWO CFR NAU agenda and push, reverses and changes things over time, isn't it?
 
Back in the 50's and 60's it was "YANQUI GO HOME!!!". Now the much more appropriate sign would be more like, "LATINO GO HOME!!!!".

Interesting how the NWO CFR NAU agenda and push, reverses and changes things over time, isn't it?

Which why they are either A. Very stable in their control or B. Love to take their time and deceive. This time they will go home, this time Rome will not fall.
 
They still take out far more then they put in, and SS is a damn [h=3]Ponzi scheme, it is going to collapse, its best to end it now before things get out of control. But its great to..[/h]
Its great to see you favor flooding the nation to the point we lose political control over our elections all in the name of funding a scam...Really does show where you stand on the issues.

Collecting zero while paying in over $1 trillion is NOT taking out more than they pay in. Quite the opposite.
 
Last time I checked the USA is already 100%+ over filled.

Last time I check, that claim was 100% wrong. Certain areas of the nation are over populated. such as New York City or the LA metroplex. But teh country itself is full of open spaces ready for use.
 
Last time I check, that claim was 100% wrong. Certain areas of the nation are over populated. such as New York City or the LA metroplex. But teh country itself is full of open spaces ready for use.

I guess ready for use only by "certain" people. There are too many of "them" here already according to some.
 
Last time I check, that claim was 100% wrong. Certain areas of the nation are over populated. such as New York City or the LA metroplex. But teh country itself is full of open spaces ready for use.

Yeah, we do not want to be filled to the brim like other nations.

Between open spaces, and large slums filled with welfare voters, its a no brainier.

You want to be a over populated nation? Leave for India.
 
anchor-baby.jpg
 

Easy solution to anchor babies is to just make all "anchor babies" wards of the state, and deport the parents.

It's a win/win situation for all involved, baby gets a great future in best country ever, and it removes incentive for the parents
 
Easy solution to anchor babies is to just make all "anchor babies" wards of the state, and deport the parents.

It's a win/win situation for all involved, baby gets a great future in best country ever, and it removes incentive for the parents

Then who would mow the lawns and clean the toilets???:confused:
 
Where did my retirement benefits go?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/25/census-anchor-baby-delivered-every-93-seconds/


This means that one anchor baby is delivered every 93 seconds, based on the 2008 census data analyzed by the Pew.

The huge number of foreign children born on U.S. soil– roughly 340,000 per year— is also an economic imposition on Americans, who pay taxes to help raise, feed, and educate those children of illegal migrants.

Eventually, those 340,000 U.S.-born foreign children can join the U.S. workforce and compete for wages against the roughly four million children of U.S. parents that enter the slow-growing U.S. economy each year.

Only 28 percent of likely U.S. voters believe that children born to illegal migrants in this country should automatically be American citizens, according to a 2011 Rasmussen Reports survey. In fact, the proposal is so unpopular that even Jeb Bush, who favors large-scale immigration, has criticized pregnant foreigners who grab citizenship for their kids by flying into the country posing as tourists. Bush described the practice as “fraud,” and asserted that, “Frankly, it’s more related to Asian people coming into our country — having children in that organized effort, taking advantage of a noble concept, which is birthright citizenship”

The growing industry of “birth tourism” is so large that even California’s government recently cracked down on the illegal — but rarely suppressed— trade.

The federal government currently grants automatic citizenship to all U.S.-born children of illegal migrants based upon what experts say is a flawed interpretation of the 14th amendment. This interpretation is backed by progressive political advocates and wealthy business interests, and it allows a pregnant foreigner to win citizenship — and myriad financial benefits — even when laws, legislators and voters oppose her entry into the nation.

The rewards to the mother and father are huge. The mother, for example, can collect federal welfare on behalf of the child, and the adult child – as a U.S. citizen – will eventually be able to win a green card for his or her parents, despite their prior illegal entry into the United States.

As National Review writes:

71 percent of illegal-alien headed households with children received some sort of welfare in 2009, compared with 39 percent of native-headed houses with children. Illegal immigrants generally access welfare programs through their U.S.-born children, to whom government assistance is guaranteed. Additionally, U.S.-born children of illegal aliens are entitled to American public schools, health care, and more, even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes.

The cost of K-12 public school alone for a U.S.-born child of illegal migrants is, at a minimum, around $160,000 (using the average cost $12,300 per pupil per year). Additionally, under universities’ system of racial preferences, anchor babies will get bonus SAT and GPA points when they apply to college. Many corporations will continue this benefits program when considering their job applications as well.

Both Senator Sen. David Vitter (R-LA)
71%
and Congressman Rep. Steve King (R-IA)
77%
have introduced bills that would correct this misapplication of the 14th amendment by ensuring citizenship is only granted to a child that has at least one parent who is either a U.S. citizen or a legal permanent resident. Presidential candidate Donald Trump has also issued a plan that would restrict this appropriation of U.S. citizenship.

But the presidential candidates favored by wealthy donors, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)
80%
and Jeb Bush, have both argued that the United States should continue this controversial application of the 14th amendment that allows foreign migrants to appropriate U.S. citizenship for their children.

Marco Rubio co-authored the Senate Gang of Eight bill, which won the endorsement of La Raza and would substantially increase family chain migration.

When asked by CNBC why he defends this unpopular application of the 14th amendment, Rubio explained that he supports it because U.S.-born foreign children “are people”:

“Those are human beings and ultimately they are people, we’re not just statistics, they’re humans with stories,” Rubio said.
Read More Stories About:

Big Government, 2016 Presidential Race, Immigration, Marco Rubio, Steve King, birthright citizenship, 14th Amendment, Gang of Eight bill, Sen. Vitter

Points to Ponder:


1- Before 1965 there were open Borders with Canada and Mexico, there were NEVER any problems


2- FDR and LBJ are responsible for the gargantuan welfare state - neither one is of Hispanic descent

3- So demand that the powers-that-be ABOLISH the welfare state - leave our Mexican and South American Alien friends alone


.
 
Easy solution to anchor babies is to just make all "anchor babies" wards of the state, and deport the parents.

It's a win/win situation for all involved, baby gets a great future in best country ever, and it removes incentive for the parents

No, we have to pay that cost, and we are stealing kids a lose/lose. They go back with their parents and we end birthright ciztenship.
 
Points to Ponder:


1- Before 1965 there were open Borders with Canada and Mexico, there were NEVER any problems


2- FDR and LBJ are responsible for the gargantuan welfare state - neither one is of Hispanic descent

3- So demand that the powers-that-be ABOLISH the welfare state - leave our Mexican and South American Alien friends alone

.


The welfare state exists now, how do you abolish it? You people always bring this up as if it was some easy task that we can just do overnight.

You know what makes it harder to get rid of a program? Adding millions of new users to that system who have a vested intersts in supporting that system.

What makes it even worse is importing people who support larger and larger goverment by the millions over year.

how you can not understand this is beyond any logical mind.

Immigration is reduced, capped and heavily regulated as to insure it never again harms us.
 
Back
Top