Official Vice Presidential debate thread - October 4, 2016

[Origanalist]

It's like they are all playing from the same book of stupid. If actual reality does not fit the narrative, then just claim that you implied whatever bullshit they need to fill out their narrative and keep on pressing. They don't GAF if they have to lie about what you and I believe in order to extend their narrative, they would just as soon dump us down an outhouse hole as look at us if we won't worship their pet despot. This is precisely the kinds of behavior I was talking about back in July-October of 2015 when I kept saying that the T-Rump Retrovirus is an infectious disease that destroys the faculties of reason. You can 1000% prove him dead wrong about your position and he's going to keep pretending like you are a fracking Hillary supporter. Because such concepts of truth, integrity, and honesty means exactly jack and shyt to these people.

I went and watched you tube music videos. Better than debating nut cases.

 

[Keith and stuff]

Too bad we don't have Pence/Johnson as the Republican ticket. Of course, Paul/anyone would be much better, but I mean out of the finalists we already have to pick from...

 

[euphemia]

#neverjohnson

I never said Trump performed well in the debate. He was terrible. Except for his hair, he looked very good in the camera frame, but that was it. He was wholly unprepared, and it was disappointing.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Too bad we don't have Pence/Johnson as the Republican ticket. Of course, Paul/anyone would be much better, but I mean out of the finalists we already have to pick from...

I see Pence as being similar to Romney, with the slight difference being that Romney surrounded himself with neocons, while Pence is a neocon all by himself (personally trained by Sith Lord Kristol).

Pence would lose, similar to how Romney lost.

 

[AZJoe]

War Hawk vs. War Hawk

 

[AZJoe]

Tom and Lew dissect the debate

 

[misterx]

I went and watched you tube music videos. Better than debating nut cases.

Section 2 of the Community Guidelines expressly states: "No insulting, antagonizing or personally attacking other users."

I think that calling other forum members, "nut cases", qualifies as prohibited behavior under this clause.

 

[Origanalist]

Section 2 of the Community Guidelines expressly states: "No insulting, antagonizing or personally attacking other users."

I think that calling other forum members, "nut cases", qualifies as prohibited behavior under this clause.

So report me. maybe you will get a gold star.

 

[Ender]

Section 2 of the Community Guidelines expressly states: "No insulting, antagonizing or personally attacking other users."

I think that calling other forum members, "nut cases", qualifies as prohibited behavior under this clause.

Unless it's CPUd, amirite?

And I think you misread [MENTION=40014]Origanalist[/MENTION]'s post; I believe he was calling the 2 debaters "nut cases", not forum members.

JMHPOV

 

[Ender]

#neverjohnson

I never said Trump performed well in the debate. He was terrible. Except for his hair, he looked very good in the camera frame, but that was it. He was wholly unprepared, and it was disappointing.

I thought he was ugly as sin.

 

[JK/SEA]

I went and watched you tube music videos. Better than debating nut cases.

as a trump voter, i feel your pain.

 

[Origanalist]

as a trump voter, i feel your pain.

Ya, ya ya.

 

[Origanalist]

Even the corn stalks don't like Trump voters.

 

[Origanalist]

Especially if they drive Mustangs.

 

[JK/SEA]

Especially if they drive Mustangs.

i got the last laugh on the corn. Trust me.

leave my mustang out of this. she didn't hurt nobody...

 

[Origanalist]

i got the last laugh on the corn. Trust me.

leave my mustang out of this. she didn't hurt nobody...

I hear she killed a Corvette.

 

[Origanalist]

 

[misterx]

Unless it's CPUd, amirite?

And I think you misread [MENTION=40014]Origanalist[/MENTION]'s post; I believe he was calling the 2 debaters "nut cases", not forum members.

JMHPOV

His reply below confirms that he was referring to me. Besides, the post he was quoting was referring to me, "You can 1000% prove him dead wrong about your position and he's going to keep pretending like you are a fracking Hillary supporter."

And no, I've never called CPUd a nut case. I take far more invective from Trump haters on this forum than I have ever given them. It's ironic considering the reason some of them claim to hate Trump is because he is disrespectful.

 

[timosman]

The best part was the message from our corporate sponsors by the Electoral Commission representatives about 15 minutes before the debate on NBC stream.

That's @11:00 https://youtu.be/mVXqNcW_-HA?t=11m

Andrea Mitchell should stop doing news on TV, she does not look so hot next to Hallie Jackson @32:35 - https://youtu.be/mVXqNcW_-HA?t=32m35s

 

[erowe1]

I never said Trump performed well in the debate. He was terrible. Except for his hair, he looked very good in the camera frame, but that was it. He was wholly unprepared, and it was disappointing.

Why would that be disappointing?