I don't think it shows a decreasing trend. I'm not sure if I said that. If I did I was wrong. I don't think it shows an increasing trend either. You can't extrapolate anything from those graphs.
You don't have to extrapolate anything. I'm saying -- draw the trendline. Is the slope positive or negative? It's positive in those graphs, and so they can be used as support for global warming. In fact, not even just "support" -- they show global warming over that period.
My point was, emissions increased over a ten year period, and at the end of that period it was colder then it was to begin with. I think this clearly rejects the notion that GHG emissions are the driving force behind climate change.
There apparently isn't a direct correlation between emissions and the average global temperature of any one month. Would we expect otherwise? Temperatures fluctuate. You can't use any one month's data point to reject global warming entirely.
I'm not the one who brought up these graphs. I can't help it if they reinforce my position.