Ladies and Gentlemen, the President of the United States...

when you field a chuckle$#@! like Trump, you deserve Hillary.

And when you field a scary bitch like Clinton, you deserve Trump.

Now, how about the other 87% of the population? What did we do to deserve the threat of either being saddled with the New Mussolini or the Female Stalin?
 
And when you field a scary bitch like Clinton, you deserve Trump.

Now, how about the other 87% of the population? What did we do to deserve the threat of either being saddled with the New Mussolini or the Female Stalin?

"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to acptulsa again."

But wait, TyrannyEagle told me you love Hillary? HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? :confused:
 
"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to acptulsa again."

But wait, TyrannyEagle told me you love Hillary? HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? :confused:

What she says and six bucks will buy you a cup of Starbucks.

Or you can just take in five bucks, and get the no b.s. discount.

This is how the Powers that Be have been advancing globalism for a century now--find something some idiots care about, field a candidate who pretends to be against it, and listen to the idiots holler that everyone has to vote for that candidate--even if he has been in office not fixing the problem for six terms.
 
I keep saying that.

Everybody here knows DAMN WELL that Hitlery is unacceptable, so why do we need opposition threads on something we all agree on?

Because some Trumpsters are butt-hurt that there's a Trump opposition thread that results in some VERY good info on what a terrible candidate he is and they think that simply because someone dares to show how there's nothing but hot air in the Trump suit those people support Billary. Of course nothing could be further from the truth but truth is the first thing to be discarded in most elections. Really the only candidate I can remember who actually used "truth" as a basis for his positions was Ron Paul (hopefully we all remember him...)
 
Because some Trumpsters are butt-hurt that there's a Trump opposition thread that results in some VERY good info on what a terrible candidate he is and they think that simply because someone dares to show how there's nothing but hot air in the Trump suit those people support Billary. Of course nothing could be further from the truth but truth is the first thing to be discarded in most elections. Really the only candidate I can remember who actually used "truth" as a basis for his positions was Ron Paul (hopefully we all remember him...)

Oh yeah..... that Ron Paul guy......isn't this forum named after him?
 
What she says and six bucks will buy you a cup of Starbucks.

Or you can just take in five bucks, and get the no b.s. discount.

This is how the Powers that Be have been advancing globalism for a century now--find something some idiots care about, field a candidate who pretends to be against it, and listen to the idiots holler that everyone has to vote for that candidate--even if he has been in office not fixing the problem for six terms.

You mean like Johnson/Weld? Yes, yes, I agree. The globalists have been doing this for ages. Trump very well may be part of it. But, one thing is for sure. So is Johnson/Weld. Something you fail to see.

NOTE: By the way, I don't recall believing you were for Hillary.
 
Because some Trumpsters are butt-hurt that there's a Trump opposition thread that results in some VERY good info on what a terrible candidate he is and they think that simply because someone dares to show how there's nothing but hot air in the Trump suit those people support Billary. Of course nothing could be further from the truth but truth is the first thing to be discarded in most elections. Really the only candidate I can remember who actually used "truth" as a basis for his positions was Ron Paul (hopefully we all remember him...)

No, not at all. There is plenty to hit him on and justly. The only thing I have ever seen anyone say is that with the plethora of real things to hit him on, why lower yourself to lying about positions that he does not have?
 
No, not at all. There is plenty to hit him on and justly. The only thing I have ever seen anyone say is that with the plethora of real things to hit him on, why lower yourself to lying about positions that he does not have?

Care to give an example? I don't remember anyone lying about his positions (and of course you have to specify the historical time line because his positions change regularly).
 
Care to give an example? I don't remember anyone lying about his positions (and of course you have to specify the historical time line because his positions change regularly).

If one of the Trump people wanted to change the forums official position on supporting Trump they could just reply to the thread its not locked or anything.
 
Back
Top