Glenn Beck evolving?

What part of 'I like him but he's not electable, so vote for Santorum because he's libertarian too (in some alternate universe where the word 'libertarian' means something else I won't say aloud)' do you not remember?

The Santorum endorsement is the number one thing that kind of discredits Beck's claim to be a libertarian. I like Beck, but I don't see how anyone who endorses Rick Santorum can possibly claim to be a libertarian. I don't even claim to be a libertarian, but I supported Ron in both 2008 and 2012 and would never consider voting for someone like Santorum.
 
Its_a_trap.jpg
 
Beck is going to strengthen Rand Paul for 2016. Thanks Beck.
 
Last edited:
Judge Napolitano and Glenn Beck are good friends and the Judge used to guest host his Beck's show. What does this say about Judge Napolitano?
 
If Glenn Beck really wants my trust back all he has to do is stay with Rand 100%.

Or adopt secession 100%. Either is fine with me.
 
Why does he want to exclude anarchists from his camp? That IMO is one indication he's not sincere. Anarchists want the same thing, maximum amount of freedom, so why the hate?
 
Why does he want to exclude anarchists from his camp? That IMO is one indication he's not sincere. Anarchists want the same thing, maximum amount of freedom, so why the hate?
I'm a Constitutionalist so even I reject Anarchy.
 
Why does he want to exclude anarchists from his camp? That IMO is one indication he's not sincere. Anarchists want the same thing, maximum amount of freedom, so why the hate?

Anarchy would lead to a total loss of freedom, because we wouldn't be able to defend the freedom we currently have.
 
I'm a Constitutionalist so even I reject Anarchy.

I'm an anarchist, and while I don't think a piece of paper can restrain government, I am still more than happy to work together with constitutionalists to try to achieve that goal.

Would you prefer that I reject politics for the rest of my life, or help you in your cause? Glenn Beck wants nothing to do with me. You?
 
Anarchy would lead to a total loss of freedom, because we wouldn't be able to defend the freedom we currently have.

The fight we are facing right now is tyranny. We need to defeat tyranny first, and then we can disagree on how best to keep the freedom.

Would you prefer that I help you in the fight against tyranny? Or should I just go away?
 
The fight we are facing right now is tyranny. We need to defeat tyranny first, and then we can disagree on how best to keep the freedom.

Would you prefer that I help you in the fight against tyranny? Or should I just go away?

I'm certainly not one to try to kick people out of the movement. Sorry if I came across that way. I just don't agree with the ultimate conclusion that anarchists have concerning government.
 
I'm certainly not one to try to kick people out of the movement. Sorry if I came across that way. I just don't agree with the ultimate conclusion that anarchists have concerning government.

Yes and that's fine. My point is that Glenn Beck does want to kick anarchists out of the movement. Which is an indication of either insincerity or ignorance. Ignorance is fine, but judging from his history, it's probably insincerity.
 
The fight we are facing right now is tyranny. We need to defeat tyranny first, and then we can disagree on how best to keep the freedom.

Would you prefer that I help you in the fight against tyranny? Or should I just go away?

Personally I'm willing to work with anyone who will help to right wrongs, whether they share my motivations and reasons or not is not important.
 
We have an illusion of freedoms. Don't pay your taxes, speed, or create corn dust and see what the government does with your so called freedoms.

I probably shouldn't have said "the freedoms we currently have." I just meant that if we had no government and no national defense we wouldn't be able to defend the freedoms that we would have if we had limited government.
 
Back
Top