A necessary (but not sufficient) condition for a libertarian society might be a racially homogeneous population comprised of any overwhelmingly majority of Caucasians. At least this has been the case wherever in history such a society is found .
A necessary (but not sufficient) condition for a libertarian society might be a racially homogeneous population comprised of any overwhelmingly majority of Caucasians. At least this has been the case wherever in history such a society is found .
I disagree - Somaliland has been MUCH better off moving in such a direction (as we've been discussing in the thread, as well as other papers on the net about it, studies, etc), though their culture is SIGNIFICANTLY different than ours - and is certainly not mostly white - quite the contrary.
A necessary (but not sufficient) condition for a libertarian society might be a racially homogeneous population comprised of any overwhelmingly majority of Caucasians. At least this has been the case wherever in history such a society is found .
Race (or "whiteness") has nothing to do with it. The key - that "necessary but not sufficient" ingredient - is a homogeneous, stable social and cultural fabric.
Statelessness in Somalia brought mostly positive changes and did not lead to a breakdown in social order or peace. On the other hand, statelessness in parts of Pakistan brought riots, discord, social upheaval, and tribal tension.