I agree that this is absolutely horrible, but I think there is a little excessive speculation with this article saying that the officers tried to cover it up. The one officer asking the other where the victim's gun was is a weak argument for "commencing a cover up." What evidence was there of a cover-up other than the one guy saying "I got your back?" "I got your back" was probably just the one officer trying to calm down the other officer for the time being...I'd assume the officer that shot Tony was freaking out (hence the "Fuck" comment) and therefore, the other other guy just wanted to keep him calm. I can't say I wouldn't say the same thing after witnessing someone shoot a guy in the back and realize he's probably going to be in jail for a long time...I know I sure as hell wouldn't go apeshit on him, who knows what he would do or what was going through his mind.
Of course, the officers did majory fuck up in several different aspects, but calling it a cover up is a bold accusation with little evidence. If they were trying to cover it up, I would think their would be statements much more incriminating than just the two quoted in the article.
Of course, the officers did majory fuck up in several different aspects, but calling it a cover up is a bold accusation with little evidence. If they were trying to cover it up, I would think their would be statements much more incriminating than just the two quoted in the article.