Chieftain1776
Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2008
- Messages
- 1,395
Musgrave....Musgrave....I saw that name somewhere today.
Oh yeah. Here it is:
http://saberinc.net/saber/about/mir.pdf
Past or current clients of SABER and Mr. Rothfeld include: Campaign for
Liberty, The National Right to Work Committee and Legal Defense Foundation,
Public Advocate of the U.S., Free Enterprise Fund, U.S. Congressman Marilyn
Musgrave (R-CO), U.S. Congressman Doug Lamborn for Congress (R-CO), Del. Mark Cole (VA), Del. Clay Athey, Del. Lee Ware (VA), Mike Farris for Lt. Governor,
the Republican Party of Virginia, Gun Owners of America, Oliver North for U.S.
Senate Committee and multiple state-level pro-life and pro-gun citizens’ organizations.
***
Apparently the fundraiser/educator guy for CFL, Michael Rothfeld, has some ties to Colorado politics. Hmmm.
Interesting.
Very interesting indeed! Excellent find!
I'm updating my theory yet again: I think Rothfeld was looking for some way to be a player in CO politics and figured out a loop hole on how to support Buck. He sought out the the money from the billionaire and offered to provide C4L as a front. He probably thought it was a clear win-win-win situation. And for him and his foreign policy views it was as LittleLightShining told us:
Hopper told me that he is a "cold warrior" and not supportive of the C4L's foreign policy position. I was told that he doesn't set political agenda or policy for C4L (just sends out frantic GOP talking point solicitations and directs strategy-- taking over the GOP). I was told that it shouldn't matter if he agrees with our principles. At which point my jaw dropped and I was ready to bang my head against the wall. In a nutshell I was told that there is no one out there who can fundraise or strategize that agrees with all of the guiding principles of C4L.
Yup this is troubling as the direction of organizations is about the Golden Rule: Those who bring in the gold make the rules. If Rothfeld is bringing in the fund-raising he will have a disproportionate influence on the message. LittleLightShining has been proven right about this Rothfeld character.
As for C4L itself we have to decide if it's foriegn policy views have been compromised. If the C4L website is any indicator then that is NOT the case as it's been consistently anti-war. BUT the website could be one thing for "stupid Paultards" like us and where the money actually goes could be another. Remember we have an eyewitness of Rothfeld saying "Don't donate to the candidates" and now seems like he's the primary mover SUPPORTING his pro-war (not necessarily neocon) candidate.
I'm sorry but at this point this is just a money maker for political hacks that couldn't make it anywhere else. I'm awaiting the statement but I don't trust the C4L to keep these pro-war people in line. Again this is just an early indicator we don't have any proof that liberty donors were bilked. It's just an indicator of where the C4L will go if Ron Paul departs from the scene. C4L imo should be a barebones organization at the national level.
Last edited: