ClydeCoulter
Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
- Messages
- 11,108
CNN: "This is an incredible show of police force". I wonder if she's going to get off right on TV.
Yes.
But it won't matter, because when it is released the conspiracy people will pretend it was fabricated with CGI.
This can hardly be considered blow back. Chechnya is one region/conflict that surprisingly the US has not been involved with. We are definitely notpro russian by any means so how this attack can be linked with supposed blow back is ridiculous. What does a marathon in Boston has to do with an armed struggle in the Northern caucus is beyond me.
Yes.
But it won't matter, because when it is released the conspiracy people will pretend it was fabricated with CGI.
I assume you have evidence for those statements you made?![]()
So here's how it's shaping up, it seems.
Two brothers, one a seemingly conservative, observant, but flashy Muslim with no American friends (because we're godless heathens)...trained in martial arts/boxing (and apparently, bomb-making). That one's dead because he rushed the police with another pressure cooker bomb during the shootout. Some reports say they were hurling explosives, others say they were shooting with Tamerlan making the final rush on the police.
Then the younger brother in a black Mercedes SUV plows through the crowd of police firing at him and (at least temporarily) escapes. We know nothing about him. But police think he's rigged with explosives.
The girlfriend of the older brother was SWAT raided and dragged kicking and screaming out of her apartment, which she shared with her boyfriend?
They're from Chechnya, but have been in the US since the older brother was four (I'd assume that the younger was born here then?) But then the uncle says they've been here for about a decade and that they're "losers." We haven't heard anything from the parents, but have heard from the uncle.
Anyways, I don't know what to make of any of this. But the narrative seems to be headed toward a version of "they hate us for our freedom/loose morals."
I was asking questions. You have the answers, so show me your evidence.
Right. The standard for a conspiracy theorist is different, I forgot. Only one side needs evidence, the other just needs "questions." The goal posts are quite different. Non-conspiracy theorists should start holding them to the same ridiculous standard of proof, that themselves set, for government involvement.
Becky, the TV news is reporting that: 1) the bombing suspects stopped at an ATM to get cash; and 2) they robbed a convenience store for cash. Ummm, if they already have cash, and enough to build bombs, go to school as reported, buy expensive knapsacks and "Bridgestone Golf" caps, etc., why risk robbing a convenience store in a heavily populated area where it is known that all convenience stores have cameras? The FBI psycho-analysts on FAUX News will probably tell us that it was a suicide attempt -- they wanted to get caught.
-
Who needs evidence when you are told what happened by your owners, right?
What? Nothing about blow-back?
Must be a conspiracy.....
![]()