Blitzer to show exit poll numbers in 5 minutes- CNN

JWaksman
I didn't call you a nut. You went on a rant about RP supporters being nutty. You brought up the other issues. You are still bringing up the issues other than the topic at hand.




I think you need to go back and actually read what I said. I AM a Ron Paul supporter.... I simply said that it's the random conspiracy theorists who say they support Paul are the ones who are dragging down this campaign. They are killing us because they feed into the worst stereotypes that the mainstream media has about this campaign. That we're all anti-semitic 9/11 troofers.
 
I think you need to go back and actually read what I said. I AM a Ron Paul supporter.... I simply said that it's the random conspiracy theorists who say they support Paul are the ones who are dragging down this campaign. They are killing us because they feed into the worst stereotypes that the mainstream media has about this campaign. That we're all anti-semitic 9/11 troofers.

STFU!
 
I find it "convenient" that about the only time anyone complains about something being off-topic is if it's "conspiracy related"

In other words only if it fits their preconceived notion of "how things are" is it "on topic"

I can't think of anything MORE relevant than the use of 911 to tear up the constitution

Blind

jwaks is a shill IMO



I'm a shill for who? Reality?? hahaha.


Honestly, do you realize how many people would have to be involved in a conspiracy to fix the exit polls? THOUSANDS. If they can't keep the results from leaking from time to time, how do they keep all of those thousands of people from going to the public with their story?


Not to mention the thousands of people who did the telephone polls in the run-up to the election, since those are always very accurate.

Not to mention the TENS of thousands of people involved in counting the votes across the country. They'd have to be in on it, too.



And none of them can talk. Ever.
 
I'm sure he'll point to him being on the site longer as evidence he is not


but look at what he's saying


completely brainwashed or paid poster?

you decide


right jwaks?


if Fox says it it must be true

all this other stuff you're bringing up are false innuendos to avoid the fact that you either don't care or aren't informed

people are getting too smart to continue to not look into things for their own, rather than take any of us at our word, look up the facts for yourself

by the way it was interesting that they pull this conspiracy theorists r kooks every time someone brings up a valid provable concern? Why would someone want to denigrate and obfuscate the truth? Who would mock and demean a person simply asking for answers to unanswered questions?
 
JWaks
I think everyone should go back and actually read what you said. Nobody said anything about all of the retarded claims you are making. If those topics are so bad and negative for this movement, why do you continue to BRING THEM UP? You turned this thread into different topics. Go back an read your own posts.
 
no with the machines they no longer need a bunch of people to lie, just a few unknowing programmers and the media to happily pound the results into the public consciousness
 
Okay... we're done here. If a few more people report this guy we can get him removed from the site.


I know we're all for free speech here. But this is a private website, so the 1st amendment doesn't apply. The mainstream media reads this message board. We can't let them think that we have people like this in our campaign. We're about the constitution, about responsible fiscal policy, about a responsible foreign policy. Not about evangelizing on conspiracy theories.
 
JWaks,
OK, OK. Every poll is 100% on target. No rigging of exit polls, elections or anything else has ever happened. I know so because a purple squirrel told me so. Ok?
 
Last edited:
LOL, JWAKs, you are the one who needs reported, if anyone, for bringing up all of these other topics. You don't think the mods will go back and notice this?





Mods, plz kill this thread
 
Last edited:
once again, people calling for a banning on truth

look at him he even tries to justify eradicating the 1st amendment,


who exactly is the candidate you are supporting?

want me to put up his own words questioning the events of that day?

see the truth is more hated here than posts rediculing other supporters
 
JWaks,
OK, OK. Every poll is 100% on target. Not rigging of exit polls, elections or anything else has ever happened. I know so because a purple squirrel told me so. Ok?




Oh God:rolleyes:... If you take a statistics class you will learn how polling works. They are snapshots that are not perfect. Looking at a bunch of different polling methodologies and averaging them (like realclearpolitics.com) or looking for trends (like pollster.com) gives a very good estimate of where the race is.



The idea that any of these (mainstream) polls are being INTENTIONALLY MANIPULATED by people with an agenda is... preposterous.



Look, obviously there's media bias against Paul. The way they bias is by not mentioning polls that have Paul doing well. Or, if Paul finishes 4th in a poll you can guarantee that the mainstream media will only mention the first three names so that they can ignore mentioning him. But they're not going to lie about the results.


There's no evidence of it. And more importantly, it's just illogical and insane. Anytime your conspiracy theory needs over 100,000 people to be on board and keep their mouth shut... you probably need to re-evaluate your life.
 
Okay, for real I'm done now. Einstein used to say that if you couldn't explain something to a 6 year old that you don't understand it. And I do understand this. But I'm not dealing with 6 year olds, I'm dealing with conspiracy theorists. So, yes, the polls are fixed. 9/11 was an inside job. JFK was an alien, and we didn't land on the moon. You're right. I give up.
 
Okay, for real I'm done now. Einstein used to say that if you couldn't explain something to a 6 year old that you don't understand it. And I do understand this. But I'm not dealing with 6 year olds, I'm dealing with conspiracy theorists. So, yes, the polls are fixed. 9/11 was an inside job. JFK was an alien, and we didn't land on the moon. You're right. I give up.

What a boring fuck you are...
 
http://www.inteldaily.com/?c=144&a=4865

The mainstream Italian media are reporting both the rigging of the New Hampshire primary for Senator Hillary Clinton and the official demands for a swift, accurate and impartial recount. In an article written by Marcello Foa, one of Europe's most respected journalists, it appears that vote tallies for all Democratic candidates as well as Republicans were reduced by Diebold vote-counting machines.

In an analysis of the hand-counted ballots, the influential Milanese newspaper - Il Giornale, reports that all Democratic candidates except Senator Hillary Clinton made gains when the New Hampshire ballots were manually tabulated, while Senator Clinton made inexplicably large gains where ballots were tabulated by computerized scanners.

According to the report, Ron Paul should have finished third in the Republican primary rather than fifth. Thus, it would appear that both Barack Obama and Ron Paul were the primary targets of vote-rigging operations in New Hampshire.

Il Giornale cites the Princeton study that alerted public attention to the vulnerability of computerized voting machines used throughout America to deliberate vote-tampering and election-rigging via manipulation of the memory cards.

The state of New Hampshire is equipped with computerized tabulation machines manufactured by Diebold, devices that have received a massive amount of negative publicity after the public awareness of vote-rigging surged dramatically following the presidential election scandal of 2000.

In previous statements, former President Jimmy Carter - who has a global reputation as one of the foremost authorities on election procedures - has frequently pointed out that the United States of America does not meet international criteria for electoral security.
 
Paul has made it clear he does not believe in this "truth movement". He went a step further in the last debate to state it's not helping him so if you care about you candidate you should stop it.

So my suggestion/request is for you people to refine why you support Paul. You should support Paul because he has supported the idea that a the official 9/11 commission report is inadequate. This does not mean he thinks it's a inside job. But it is obvious the report could greatly be improved.

So just say this... if you must you may give your theories of what might be found if a better investigation was done. But please stop inferring Paul supports a inside theory.
 
Looking at the previous pages I see the problem is that the 14-year-olds took over this thread.

sigh....
 
What a boring fuck you are...

Please don't fight over issues in that manner. We should all respect each other's opinions. Although I don't believe in 911 conspiracies, I will defend your right to believe in it to death and so would Ron Paul.

I don't give a flying fuck what you think as long you don't force it down my throat.

Now, back to topic... what did the exit poll say?
 
Back
Top