"Attractive hazard" [Orlando Gator attack]

That is a ludicrous assertion. What are you even talking about? If they know enough about alligators to realize there's a danger, which almost everyone does, then that's all the more reason to think the signs WOULD help, not the other way around. Most people know alligators are dangerous but they just don't know where alligators are found. So if you tell them that they are in the water at the beach, that doesn't lead you to the conclusion that they would ignore the signs. In fact, that leads you to the exact opposite conclusion, that if you tell them that there are alligators here, they will realize alligators are dangerous and be more cautious. Heck, that's probably why Disney didn't tell anyone. They didn't want to scare people and ruin the party.



Yeah, that seems reasonable, but it's a bit irrelevant to the liability issue.



This all goes back to the doctrine of reasonable expectation. You can't just wave your hand and say "The world is a dangerous place! Get used to it, ya crybabies!" If you were a friend and you had someone over from out of state to your property with a pond, would you not want them to know about the gators? Would you hold a party on the beach of said pond and not make sure everyone knew there were gators? Would you assume that no swimming signs meant everyone should know it's because of gators and that you don't have to be swimming for a gator to attack you? Jesus, the thick-headedness of some people.



There certainly are ridiculous litigations having to do with signs, but that doesn't mean you should just belay all signs and say they're all just for nanny-staters. I think I've made it clear that there was a reasonable expectation for Disney to warn its guests. Everything about this expectation is reasonable. Disney gets guests from all over the world, so it's reasonable to expect that some people don't know about the commonality of alligators in Florida. At the same time, it's reasonable to expect them to know what alligators are and that they are dangerous. It's also very reasonable to expect a host in said alligator-infested location to be wary of their less conscious guests and tell them out of sheer humanity to watch out for alligators because they are dangerous. If I was a friend, that's what I would do for guests on my property. This is made not only a reasonable expectation but downright compulsory when you build a damn beach on a pond on your property which you know has alligators in it, hold a party on that beach and you STILL don't tell anyone. It is absurd to think the property owner wouldn't be the least bit negligent and that this is nobody's fault and $#@! just happens. $#@!ing ridiculous, you people.



Because Suz isn't having guests from all over the world and can easily warn anyone who comes to her property, whom she probably knows personally, to watch out for alligators without needing a sign. A warning in this instance, where there were many visitors to whom the inviting host was not familiar and could not greet individually and tell them, would therefore take on a more crowd-oriented appearance, such as signs or an announcement on a loudspeaker or something like that. Not to mention Suz just mentioned that her brother DID warn her of the gators. So, checkmate on that one.



Did you really just compare lightning to alligators? Lightning is common everywhere in the world. Literally everywhere. Alligators, not so much. Also, lightning is much less predictable and you have zero chance of reacting a lightning shows itself. That's deliberately incorrect language because I'm emphasizing the fact that alligators are things that you can see coming. They are not immaterial and unpredictable. They can be seen, tracked, known about. They don't strike from the sky at 163,000 miles per second without a moment's notice. You are really reaching into the absurd to pull out these lame excuses as to why we should all just toughen up and stop being a bunch of crybabies who expect people to nanny us. No, we just expect people to be friends towards those who visit their property, because that's what any rational-thinking friend would do.


Haha, I knew this thread would elicit people crying the nanny state argument but didn't expect the crazy shit Melissa comes up with. I think she likes being contrary for the sake of conversation. She also makes shit up out of left field, like this said to me:

The heart of the matter for you is how much money they have.

How anyone could get that out of anything I've said is beyond me. No amount of money will EVER heal this horrific trauma for this poor family. The death of a child has a high probability of ending in divorce, too, because it it's so stressful. I hope they don't suffer that loss, as well.


Did anyone watch that video posted about the crocodile? If not, do check it out. It's incredible.
 
Oh sure it is. But based on the number of 2 year olds who have stayed in that resort (probably millions) compared to the number who have been attacked by gators (1) I think we can conclude that Disney is a very, very safe place to stay.

You Disney apologists need to make up your mind. Either the gator danger is so freaking real that everybody should just expect it and and so Disney isn't safe (the "It's the parents fault for not realizing there could be gators even without a sign), or the fact that Disney is normally a safe place means that people should expect to be safe wherever they are on the park unless they are warned otherwise. Your argument would be like a kid gets thrown to his death off a ride at Disney and you're like "Well it was only one kid."

The real issue is was there a foreseeable danger that the resort knew or should have known about but didn't warn the public it was inviting in to it's "safe space" about. It's really that simple. Seriously, if there was no potential lawsuit involved would you and others here still be arguing against the need for warning signs? If you owned the resort and knew about a gator danger would your reaction be "Meh...put up some no swimming signs and be done with it. Don't won't people panicking about gators and going somewhere else for vacation after all?"
 
Remind me never to come to your property if we ever become friends. Which probably isn't going to happen since I know you are incapable of acting like a friend.

We're both from WV, and I don't know about your experiences, but it has always been very common for people to warn visitors on their property about possible wildlife that might be lurking around, especially if it's something unusual, like bears or panthers. (No, it's true, there were two panthers known to dwell in the woods around our house when we were young.) Some things may be very rare, but it usually pops into a friend's mind to warn them about the things they should be most concerned about that are common in that area but might not be common in other areas, especially if they might be lethal. It doesn't require the threat of a lawsuit for a friend to warn people, so is it too much to ask for Disney to act like any friend would and give its visitors a simple warning?

^This. 10000x this!
 
3DJ6bV3.gif

That always makes me laugh.
 
You would have needed the father to be the one with the weapon, draw it fast enough, and then find a lethal shot on a gator moving full-tilt through splashing water with a child in its jaws.

In my earlier example, people are invited to enjoy the beach. The number of hazard signs it would require to cover all of the potentially deadly things that could happen would not allow you to see the water, let alone get in it.

PaulConventionWV keeps calling it "alligator-infested" even though there were five caught in that entire area and the last bite happened in the early 80s. Doesn't exactly seem infested.

Again, I don't think signs are going to fix their problems. They should go with the eight-foot barrier that will keep gators away (and upon which people will climb, walk, burn themselves, cut themselves, and fall drunkenly from). It looks like those islands I mentioned in another post already exist, so the gators can sun themselves without needing to venture near the various beach areas. This will solve the issue until a snake bites someone, who will immediately say that they had no idea there could be snakes in Florida.

Your reasoning is incorrigibly naive. You keep referring to people being idiots as if it's the same thing as building a damn beach on your pond in which alligators are harbored. I don't care if it's an infestation, five alligators in a pond is more than enough to have some sort of warning about. Most people know there are alligators in Florida, but they don't exactly slither through the grass, so it is relatively easy to know where they will be (in the pond) and warn people who might venture near said location. Just as I would warn someone not to go in a grassy patch if I knew there were snakes there. It's just common fucking sense, something you appear to think is for sissies. It's amazing to think that someone from WV doesn't understand the concept of warning someone if there is a deadly creature on your property.

And another ridiculous argument you make is that you think people will say they had no idea there were alligators in Florida. Almost everyone knows there are alligators in Florida, but they aren't aware of the distribution of the gator population or if they might expect to find them in a pond at a Disney resort. Most people would assume not because, once again, common fucking sense, but I wouldn't expect you to know anything about that.
 
Haha, I knew this thread would elicit people crying the nanny state argument but didn't expect the crazy $#@! Melissa comes up with. I think she likes being contrary for the sake of conversation. She also makes $#@! up out of left field, like this said to me:

The heart of the matter for you is how much money they have.

How anyone could get that out of anything I've said is beyond me. No amount of money will EVER heal this horrific trauma for this poor family. The death of a child has a high probability of ending in divorce, too, because it it's so stressful. I hope they don't suffer that loss, as well.


Did anyone watch that video posted about the crocodile? If not, do check it out. It's incredible.

Because everyone knows signs cost millions of dollars.

Besides, I've already proven that it's common practice to warn visitors even if you're not a millionaire.

And this doesn't mean every time someone is hurt on your property you should be held responsible. It's all about reasonable expectation. In this case, it was beyond reasonable to expect them to warn people about the dangers there. If you go to a similar event on someone's property and they tell you after the fact that there were deadly creatures in the water on that beach, would you ever go back to their property? I sure as hell wouldn't, especially if my two year old was wading in that very water.

It's very simple. Disney was negligent and didn't do what any other normal person would do because they didn't want to ruin the party. The fact that the party was ruined by their negligence just makes them look like bumbling, incompetent fools.
 
Last edited:
If a friend goes over to a friend's house and the property has a pond on it and there are alligators in said pond, I would definitely expect the property owner to let his friends know that there alligators in that pond first thing they come on the property.

About 3 years ago a family of black bear crossed through my yard and ate my cat.

For how long do I have to disclose that fact to everyone that visits my home? What about the FedEx guy?

Is there a size billboard you'd insist I have constructed? Should all of my neighbors have billboards too? What about when the FedEx guy visits their home... I mean a black bear has like 10 mile territory. Maybe everyone in the county should have a billboard now.
 
This'll be the last one, then you guys can continue your freakout in peace.

How come you're not posting this very thing about the amoeba-related death I mentioned earlier? No signs for that? I don't think that person's any less dead. If the kid had died from that, would you be precisely this outraged?

You don't actually need to answer, but it'd be nice if you thought about it.

G'night

bingo. if we're all obligated to post signs about gators to open the door of our business then we're all obligated to post signs about amoebas too.

and then and then and then and then and then and then and then.... oh and don't forget lightening strikes... they happen all the time in Florida.


The year was 1969 when Steve Marshburn was struck by lightning. He wasn’t out golfing or fishing, he was working inside a bank. Lightning found a path through an underground speaker at the drive-through window and worked its way to the stool where he sat.
"I still have the migraines," Marchburn told NPR. "The lightning – when it hit my back, it went up my spine, went to the left side of my brain and scorched it, came down, went out my right hand that was holding a metal teller stamp."
http://www.treehugger.com/natural-s...etting-struck-lightning-and-how-avoid-it.html

ban metal teller stamps? they are really attractive... there's even a historical precedent to be struck by lightening while holding them.

be forewarned...
if you choose to use this metal teller stamp
you might die of lightening strike!
 
what if the whole damn state floods from "global warming" and sea level rise... omg! millions of flood victims; thousands dead

should absentee landlords be liable? Many would say its clearly foreseeable.

hurricanes? tsunami? earthquakes?

where does it end for the property owner? would he be ok if he just offered a 1000 page cliffs notes version of every potential natural disaster, predator, parasite, virus, or bacterium one might encounter on the property? How obligated should the property owner be to ensure that patrons have actually read and are aware of the potential natural dangers?
 
Last edited:
About 3 years ago a family of black bear crossed through my yard and ate my cat.

For how long do I have to disclose that fact to everyone that visits my home? What about the FedEx guy?

Is there a size billboard you'd insist I have constructed? Should all of my neighbors have billboards too? What about when the FedEx guy visits their home... I mean a black bear has like 10 mile territory. Maybe everyone in the county should have a billboard now.

You can make anything sound ridiculous if you just imagine up ridiculous scenarios that, by the way, have nothing to do with what I'm proposing, which is a simple, common, everyday sign or some kind of warning through other media. You don't have to construct a billboard or anything like that, ok?

As for the black bears, you can disclose it to your visitors for however long you like to ensure their safety. They roam around a lot, so it's not likely that they would always be found on your property in a very specific location like, say, a pond. And it's not like you constructed some kind of attraction outside where you knew there were black bears around. If you did that, then heck yes, you should disclose that to your visitors.

You like to make it complicated, but it's really simple. You can dream up whatever scenario you want and maybe it will be ambiguous enough that I will eventually say 'Gee, I don't know', but I will always point out how it was a reasonable expectation in THIS scenario.
 
bingo. if we're all obligated to post signs about gators to open the door of our business then we're all obligated to post signs about amoebas too.

and then and then and then and then and then and then and then.... oh and don't forget lightening strikes... they happen all the time in Florida.

Yeah, like I said, go crazy with dreaming up your fictitious scenarios. Amoebas in the water is still a very different scenario because there's no way to control or monitor how amoebas behave or where they will be, much less lightning. If there was a certain area of the pond where it was known that certain killer amoebas were concentrated in unusually high numbers, I'd say it would be nice to be notified about that, too, especially if the attraction were built in that specific area. What is known is that the alligators are always in the pond and they are always a threat that can, at the very least, be recognized and notified about. But hey, keep dreaming up scenarios and you might find one ambiguous enough to get me to say I don't know, but this one is really straightforward. Tell your damn guests that the party you're holding is right on gator feeding grounds. That way people can choose not to come, to come and not bring their children, to keep a safe distance from the water, whatever it is. If you're just swimming in a pond with no alligators, then there's really no way to prepare against amoebas, but amoebas exist everywhere in the world, as does lightning, so it's reasonable to expect people to already be aware of this stuff.

http://www.treehugger.com/natural-s...etting-struck-lightning-and-how-avoid-it.html

ban metal teller stamps? they are really attractive... there's even a historical precedent to be struck by lightening while holding them.

be forewarned...
if you choose to use this metal teller stamp
you might die of lightening strike!

I don't know what a metal teller stamp is and I don't care. Lightning is everywhere in the world and it's magnitudes less predictable than a bunch of alligators in a pond, so that doesn't apply here.
 
what if the whole damn state floods from "global warming" and sea level rise... omg! millions of flood victims; thousands dead

should absentee landlords be liable? Many would say its clearly foreseeable.

hurricanes? tsunami? earthquakes?

where does it end for the property owner? would he be ok if he just offered a 1000 page cliffs notes version of every potential natural disaster, predator, parasite, virus, or bacterium one might encounter on the property? How obligated should the property owner be to ensure that patrons have actually read and are aware of the potential natural dangers?

I don't know, man. Give me some specific examples so I can tear them apart. Hurricanes, tsunamis: everybody knows about those. They're on the weather channel. That's not the landlord's job. Weather is something far less predictable than some crocodiles in a pond where an attraction was built specifically for humans to hang out at. Luckily, we have weather services who warn us about this stuff and evacuation services if it's a really big deal. Besides that, everybody already knows to consider the weather when going to a place. That is a part of life wherever you are in the world. If you don't want to live in a place where there are hurricanes and tsunamis, then it's pretty easy to avoid that. The last alligator attack was in the 1980s. The last time the sea levels rose and wiped out Florida was.... when?

Unlike alligators, people can't control their proximity to amoebas because they're all over the place, too, and there's no way to know if they're there or not. That doesn't mean we shouldn't be cautious about things we can warn about and can predict, like ferocious beasts all located in a very specific area on which you are building an attraction so people can hang out there. Don't warn about the things you can't, do warn about the things you can.
 
Last edited:
Another piece of evidence that it was plain negligence is the clear motive Disney had for not telling people about the gators. And yet you Disney apologists won't even consider THAT evidence. It doesn't matter what their motives were, after all, does it? Except it kinda does because the fact that they have such a motive further strengthens the fact that they knew it would have caused people to change their behavior if they had let them know about it. There are signs all over the place for things far more trivial than that in the US, but they couldn't put up a sign about the alligators? Clearly they were hoping not to attract any attention to the fact that there was any danger there so that people wouldn't feel uneasy about going to their awesome party.

Did you consider that, presence? Or are you just in blind denial that there is any scenario in which it is reasonable for you to let your visitors know about something that could very possibly kill them? Is there any such scenario in your mind?
 
muh signs -quick, organize the sign police to make sure everyone's signage is in order, someone has left their house and has no possible way to determine the surroundings they may encounter.

or

Do it because you want to (put up a $ign), not because you have to. D World will never get my business, they should have had a sign.

That is the peaceful way for myself to approach it. Who's with me? The peaceful, that's who.

I am sorry for that family's loss, we see tourists neglecting their surroundings out here all the time ending in loss of life, and it is heartbreaking every time.
It is no reason to whip out the gun.
 
Last edited:
muh signs -quick, organize the sign police to make sure everyone's signage is in order, someone has left their house and has no possible way to determine the surroundings they may encounter.

or

Do it because you want to (put up a $ign), not because you have to. D World will never get my business, they should have had a sign.

That is the peaceful way for myself to approach it. Who's with me? The peaceful, that's who.

I am sorry for that family's loss, we see tourists neglecting their surroundings out here all the time ending in loss of life, and it is heartbreaking every time.
It is no reason to whip out the gun.

I don't think anyone has said they should be FORCED to put a sign there (I didn't) but I DO think it's bad business and had I owned the place, I would've had it on a sign.
 
The heart of the matter for you is how much money they have.

How anyone could get that out of anything I've said is beyond me. No amount of money will EVER heal this horrific trauma for this poor family. The death of a child has a high probability of ending in divorce, too, because it it's so stressful. I hope they don't suffer that loss, as well.


Did anyone watch that video posted about the crocodile? If not, do check it out. It's incredible.

I didn't see a video about a crocodile. I saw some about alligators, including a few I posted.

You mentioned the billions that Disney has earlier in the thread, and are the only one to bring up the concept that they seem to have "enough money" to put up signs.

Amoebas in the water is still a very different scenario because there's no way to control or monitor how amoebas behave or where they will be, much less lightning.

Not at all. You can test the water regularly, which people do in places where people are expected to be swimming. You can bet your butt they are testing for organisms in the pool. The story I posted about the amoeba death was at a different part of Disney, because it turns out their filters don't filter out every single organism in the water. This happened about as long ago as the previous alligator-related attack at the park, which was cited as a reason to warn everyone about alligators. Sometimes you do need to look at context.

Lightning is not the same in every state. Most of the deaths by lightning are sadly preventable, but people don't understand that afternoon storms roll in very quickly, and that on a rare, extra-humid day, you can have horrific thunderstorms first thing in the morning. That makes it a terrible time to golf, for instance, or be at the beach, or up in metal bleachers. Florida has far more lightning than other places, just like North Carolina (on susano's map early in the thread) has fewer gators, though it still has them.

I don't know what a metal teller stamp is and I don't care. Lightning is everywhere in the world and it's magnitudes less predictable than a bunch of alligators in a pond, so that doesn't apply here.

Again, not even remotely true. Texas and Florida have much higher incidence of lightning strikes. Hell, as I'm getting ready for work this morning, there's a pseudo-stationary storm over one city in Florida producing 2k+ lightning strikes. It's a natural hazard that seems normal to those of us living near it. Just like the alligators, snakes, and other things. If you don't see a parallel there, you don't need to mock it.

You can make anything sound ridiculous if you just imagine up ridiculous scenarios that, by the way, have nothing to do with what I'm proposing, which is a simple, common, everyday sign or some kind of warning through other media. You don't have to construct a billboard or anything like that, ok?

As for the black bears, you can disclose it to your visitors for however long you like to ensure their safety. They roam around a lot, so it's not likely that they would always be found on your property in a very specific location like, say, a pond. And it's not like you constructed some kind of attraction outside where you knew there were black bears around. If you did that, then heck yes, you should disclose that to your visitors.

But the scenario was a killer black bear only three years ago. The scenario that has you riled up is a previous non-deadly alligator attack on the property 30 years ago, and that people should have been warned based on that. Presence's question here is more than valid. It's also another natural hazard that people in the area know of, but that someone not familiar with the area might not be.
And another ridiculous argument you make is that you think people will say they had no idea there were alligators in Florida. Almost everyone knows there are alligators in Florida, but they aren't aware of the distribution of the gator population or if they might expect to find them in a pond at a Disney resort. Most people would assume not because, once again, common $#@!ing sense, but I wouldn't expect you to know anything about that.

It's common sense to assume Disney's ponds are immune to wildlife? Or your buddy's? I would actually be more suspicious of someone assuring me there was nothing dangerous in their lake/pond.

At least you pointed out that you shouldn't be liable.

You Disney apologists need to make up your mind. Either the gator danger is so freaking real that everybody should just expect it and and so Disney isn't safe (the "It's the parents fault for not realizing there could be gators even without a sign), or the fact that Disney is normally a safe place means that people should expect to be safe wherever they are on the park unless they are warned otherwise. Your argument would be like a kid gets thrown to his death off a ride at Disney and you're like "Well it was only one kid."

It's not "Disney apologists." I have already pointed out that Disney is going to be liable because knowing the gators were hand-fed makes them no longer "natural." It makes them more likely to approach/attack people. THAT is a problem. Without that fact, no, I don't think it would be Disney's fault --- which does not mean I think it's the parents' "fault."

I don't expect any two year olds will be getting drunk and climbing your proposed fence. If I had a toddler and there was not a gator sign I might have let him wade on the beach in one foot of water even if the sign said "No swimming." The sign didn't say "No wading" so I might not have thought we were in any danger. And snakes typically try to get away from you. If there were snakes known to hunt people in Florida then that would probably be a good idea for a sign as well. Really this is a silly argument. If there was no need for a gator sign then there was no need for a "no swimming sign." Hell, Disney should just say "Come to this park at your own risk. We really hope you don't die." They gave the impression that they were a family safe theme park. If what people should know is "This is the equivalent of the Australian outback and your kids might look like snack food to hungry gators" then fine. Disney should say that in its advertising or relocate its theme parks to places like Nebraska.

No, but parents put their kids on ledges and edges quite often. Adults will definitely sit atop a wall, even when it's really obviously a bad idea. Snakes typically try to get away from you, unless they are cornered or startled enough to strike you. Florida has some very nasty varieties, many of which could be found in the sort of shore environment the kid was playing in. Gators, btw, will also try to get away UNLESS THEY ARE HAND-FED. Most of the comments from the pitchfork crowd seems to come from the idea that every alligator is just prowling around waiting to kill you. Of all the videos and photos posted, how many ended with the alligator harming someone? Millions of these things around, and yet we're not all waddling around on stumps because they're hunting us down.

We're both from WV, and I don't know about your experiences, but it has always been very common for people to warn visitors on their property about possible wildlife that might be lurking around, especially if it's something unusual, like bears or panthers. (No, it's true, there were two panthers known to dwell in the woods around our house when we were young.) Some things may be very rare, but it usually pops into a friend's mind to warn them about the things they should be most concerned about that are common in that area but might not be common in other areas, especially if they might be lethal. It doesn't require the threat of a lawsuit for a friend to warn people, so is it too much to ask for Disney to act like any friend would and give its visitors a simple warning?

I'm not "from" WV, though it was lovely there. If I had to go through the list of possible wildlife near here, you'd never get in the door. Caution: turkeys, possums, raccoons, panthers, bears, foxes, owls, hawks, geese, alligators, snakes, lizards, frogs, deer, mosquitoes, alligator snapping turtles, ticks, lovebugs, armadillos, rabbits, dogs, cats, feral hogs, centipedes, spiders, palmetto bugs, squirrels... also please avoid quicksand, swamp gas, any pine tree that looks like it's leaning, the big hole caused by a lightning strike a week ago, poison ivy, poison oak, the heat (which people DON'T understand, and die of quite regularly, before you come back with "it can get hot ANYWHERE), the humidity, afternoon rainstorms, morning storms, any pond or lake (the bottoms tend to be covered with clinging plants people underestimate, at which point they get snagged and die), the springs (people die in the cave systems there because they underestimate the danger and overestimate their capabilities), any loose soil, sinkholes...

Some of those are more deadly than others. Nearly all of them are possible anywhere in Florida, including Disney, which despite having people out and about patrolling is not under a biodome.

No one warned me about the deer in WV being rather large and aggressive. I figured it out when I saw one bounding down a hill by jumping on and off cars parked along the side of the road. I'm glad I didn't park there, but I didn't rage at someone for not putting up a sign. Speaking of which, no one has addressed my hope that they put some thought into the signage. The "deer crossing" sign just looks like a happy deer jumping around. It doesn't exactly convey the fact that they jump into the road and cause deadly accidents.

Yep, that's long, but since people love to mock once someone leaves, it sort of had to be. Normal gators are not out to kill you and aren't much of a hazard. Signs are a polite thing to do, but not some requirement or else you're a heartless corporation that obviously wants everyone to die because they put a beach next to a lake that is for fireworks and boat shows. Everyplace you visit is going to have natural hazards that your host or hotel are not required to go through "just in case." All of this is moot because the alligators, by virtue of being hand-fed and by virtue of the fact this was communicated to Disney, are no longer natural hazards.
 
Lightning is not the same in every state. Most of the deaths by lightning are sadly preventable, but people don't understand that afternoon storms roll in very quickly, and that on a rare, extra-humid day, you can have horrific thunderstorms first thing in the morning. That makes it a terrible time to golf, for instance, or be at the beach, or up in metal bleachers. Florida has far more lightning than other places, just like North Carolina (on susano's map early in the thread) has fewer gators, though it still has them.

Again, not even remotely true. Texas and Florida have much higher incidence of lightning strikes. Hell, as I'm getting ready for work this morning, there's a pseudo-stationary storm over one city in Florida producing 2k+ lightning strikes. It's a natural hazard that seems normal to those of us living near it. Just like the alligators, snakes, and other things. If you don't see a parallel there, you don't need to mock it.

Florida lightening is probably the worst and it doesn't even have to be storming where you are to get struck by it. I remember an incident awhile back about a man getting struck and killed whilst biking on a beautiful day - there was a storm over the ocean and lightening from it wacked him. :( I think that was in Clearwater.


But the scenario was a killer black bear only three years ago. The scenario that has you riled up is a previous non-deadly alligator attack on the property 30 years ago, and that people should have been warned based on that. Presence's question here is more than valid. It's also another natural hazard that people in the area know of, but that someone not familiar with the area might not be.

In presence's scenario, he wasn't feeding the bear family or was aware his neighbors were. That's the difference to me. If this was just some gator passing by in an area where Disney wasn't aware that gators normally hung out, I would feel differently but that's not the case. Disney was repeatedly warned that the gators were hanging out in the shallow water around that beach and it seems they did nothing to warn guests. If presence had a black bear family hanging out around his front door because people were feeding them and he knew about it, I would hope he would warn people.

It's not "Disney apologists." I have already pointed out that Disney is going to be liable because knowing the gators were hand-fed makes them no longer "natural." It makes them more likely to approach/attack people. THAT is a problem. Without that fact, no, I don't think it would be Disney's fault --- which does not mean I think it's the parents' "fault."

Exactly. I must've missed that in one of your earlier posts.



Yep, that's long, but since people love to mock once someone leaves, it sort of had to be. Normal gators are not out to kill you and aren't much of a hazard. Signs are a polite thing to do, but not some requirement or else you're a heartless corporation that obviously wants everyone to die because they put a beach next to a lake that is for fireworks and boat shows. Everyplace you visit is going to have natural hazards that your host or hotel are not required to go through "just in case." All of this is moot because the alligators, by virtue of being hand-fed and by virtue of the fact this was communicated to Disney, are no longer natural hazards.


I don't think anyone's arguing that Disney (or anyone else) should have to warn guests of every possible hazard. I also don't think anyone's advocated that Disney should be forced by law to warn about the gators (I haven't read every single post, I suppose someone could have). I'm saying they should've done more to warn guests and discourage the feeding. Disney KNEW this was a problem for years. I don't see how that makes one part of a pitchfork crowd.
 
Hand fed or not. Disney has an obligation to inform guests of the danger. Reading the scenarios being argued in this thread have reached the "jumping the shark" (er, alligator as the case may be) point.

I think at some point in some meeting at Disney there has been discussion about alligators (and various other dangers), guest safety and not upsetting the guest experience. I wouldn't want to be the people who decided not to include the warning about alligators, trouble sleeping at night....
 
florida-sunshine-state-sign.jpg


Warning: Exposure to sunlight is known to cause skin cancer and may cause death. Please wear appropriate clothing and sunscreen with a an SPF factor of 30 or higher.
There are alligators in fresh water and sharks in the salt water. Please use only approved swimming pools to limit your exposure.
Mosquitoes may carry the Zika virus. To avoid mosquitoes please remain indoors.

Enjoy your stay!
 
Last edited:
This is where libertarians really piss me off sometimes. This has nothing to do with the "nanny" state or even politics. I don't understand this attitude of "too bad their son just died, they should have known. Everyone knows.."

Disney is a tourist attraction. Many people that go there don't know enough about Florida. What about people who are coming from other countries? You expect all of them to be as knowledgeable about Florida gators as you are? A "no swimming sign" is not enough. It only makes sense to warn people. And yes, some people do read signs. I do. What is it with you guys? This isn't about politics or libertarianism. Have some fucking sympathy and think logically, rather than making everything into libertarianism vs liberalism.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top