Jesus reaffirmed the 10 commandments. Paul not only did not do away with the 10 commandments he did not have the RIGHT to do away with them. Jesus = God. Paul = man. A good man, but a man nonetheless.
But, like I said, Paul did not teach what you think he was teaching. We are not under the human condemnation of the law, but we are still under the law. Sin is still defined as the transgression of the law. (1 John 3:4) The law still points out sin. (Romans 7:7) The wages of sin is still death. (Romans 6:23) But the good part is that the gift of God is eternal life. (Same verse). All of the 10 commandments are still binding. Even coveting is still wrong. (Again see Romans 7:7). Further Jesus said that unless our righteousness EXCEEDS that of the pharisees, we will not enter heaven. (Matthew 5:20).
But I'll ask you the same question I asked earlier. Which of the 10 commandments do you now think it is ok to break? Is it ok to steal or kill or covet or commit adultery or dishonor your parents or use God's name as a swear word? Really?
Edit: I went back and looked up the verses you quoted and I see your mistake. Re-read Galatians 5:1-6 and explain to me why you apparently think circumcision was part of the 10 commandments?
1 It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.
2 Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all. 3 Again I declare to every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law. 4 You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace. 5 For through the Spirit we eagerly await by faith the righteousness for which we hope. 6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision has any value. The only thing that counts is faith expressing itself through love.
Again you have to understand that there was a ceremonial law that stood apart from the 10 commandments. Christians don't have to be circumcised. But Christians are supposed to abstain from killing, adultery, perjury, coveting etc.
Now let's look at 2 Corinthians 3:7 in context.
7 Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, transitory though it was, 8 will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? 9 If the ministry that brought condemnation was glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness! 10 For what was glorious has no glory now in comparison with the surpassing glory. 11 And if what was transitory came with glory, how much greater is the glory of that which lasts!
12 Therefore, since we have such a hope, we are very bold. 13 We are not like Moses, who would put a veil over his face to prevent the Israelites from seeing the end of what was passing away. 14 But their minds were made dull, for to this day the same veil remains when the old covenant is read. It has not been removed, because only in Christ is it taken away. 15 Even to this day when Moses is read, a veil covers their hearts. 16 But whenever anyone turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away. 17 Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. 18 And we all, who with unveiled faces contemplate[a] the Lord’s glory, are being transformed into his image with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.
Remember earlier when I said that the new covenant isn't really all that new? Well 2 Corinthians 3:7-18 also says nothing about doing away with the 10 commandments. To the contrary it talks of the "old covenant" being like a "veil". That's because it was communicated indirectly through Moses. But God first TRIED to talk DIRECTLY to the Israelites. That's what we can have under the new covenant. The same direct face to face communication with God that Moses had and that God tried to have with all of Israel.
