Why Ron Paul is handling the New Republic piece properly

[Quick]

I thought Paul was different.

You're still here? Thought you would have grown tired of posting here all night and constantly ignoring facts presented to you while you claim that Paul isn't the person you thought he was and that he was involved.

 

[Shavenyak]

What planet do you live on?

Fox News has already run with totally unfounded accusations that Ron is a truther nut. Do you really think they care about journalistic integrity?

And look where the anti-Paul campaign has got them. Down, what, 3 BILLION dollars in the last couple of weeks? CNN and MSNBC punking them at every chance?

 

[Mises]

...I've sensed an underlying agenda going on with many of Paul's core supporters (the one's who've known about the man for years) I could have never predicted the fire that was to be uncovered by TNR.

The New Republic has uncovered many false fires. That aside, what is the "underlying agenda" you sense? I'm curious. Outside of the newsletters, where is the evidence to support such a suspicion?

I am beginning to think you may need to switch your support to someone who supports mass murder in the Middle East. At least you'll sleep better at night knowing that you almost supported someone who you "sense" has supporters who have an "underlying agenda."

 

[FreeTraveler]

Yeah, well before you slam on Tucker, remember, he has wished Paul's campaign the best.

He was probably slammed senseless by this revelation like many of the rest us were.

I'll say this, if Paul is a closet (stealth) White Nationalist, then he is my enemy. And unfortunately, all pointers are pointing to the fact that he is, in fact, at the very least a closet case.

Issue asked and answered. I'll call you for what you are... [edit/forum guidelines]

 

[godawgs]

I thought Paul was different.

Everyone quit responding to Courtney. Period. She/he has made up their mind and continues to cause each of you to respond to the thread causing it to stay at the top of the forum. Do any of you think you are going to change his/her mind?

Of course not. So quit trying.

 

[Billy Budd]

[edit/forum guidelines]

 

[rockwell]

[edit/forum guidelines]

 

[kaleidoscope eyes]

Dan Abrams brought it up on MSNBC tonight. Perhaps the other news "journalists" are waiting on a more substantive explanation from Dr. Paul before they, as they are fond to say here, "release the hounds".

Time will tell. Let's see if it makes it to FOX's debate tomorrow night. Anybody care to speculate??

As a matter of fact, the 4AM airing of Abrams CUT the newsletter bit out of winners/losers (ok it was still mentioned in the "Coming Up" thing, but the actual bit itself was gone, I rewound it a number of times to make sure. so perhaps the MSM really DOES know this is bunk and doesn't want to be responsible for anything slanderous, well at least MSNBC? About the debate w/ Fox tonight? who knows?


Oh yeah... Mises, you are 100% spot on! Summed this whole damn thing up quite succinctly i think.