tremendoustie
Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
- Messages
- 6,809
I think you are correct if the goal is liberty but not for the reason's stated. I think the FSP as conceptualized is not strategically viable. The premise of FSP is that a scattered tireless minority can liberate an entire state. I reject the premise on it's face holding geographical organization requires better strategic planning, starting on a smaller scale such as simply taking over one county, and working up. I am on the other hand rooting for the FreeKeene wing of FSP because it is strategically focused in one locality.
I will happily eat crow if I am proven wrong.
It's already having a marked impact at the state level government, with many bad bills being stopped, and a number of good bills being passed, as a direct result of freestater influence. The thing you have to realize is, the vast majority of people don't take the time to be activists, or to run for office (especially in a state where reps get $100 a year). If activists move, they have a disproportionately large impact.