Who really rules in USA ?

[Marenco]

Here’s a look into who was involved in setting up the Federal Reserve in 1913.

* Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin
* Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris
* Israel Moses Sieff Banks of Italy
* Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany and Amsterdam
* Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
* Lehman Brothers Bank of New York
* Goldman Sachs Bank of New York
* Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (Controlled By the Rockefeller Family Tree)




Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. 1913 “When the President signs this bill, the invisible government of the monetary power will be legalized….the worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill.”

 

[therepublic]

You all got it right. Here is a recent article on the matter:

The bottom line: the United States has been taken over by a financial terrorism network. Let’s face it, we are all hostages of these financial terrorists and their puppet politicians would rather be in on the scam than defend our interests. If these terrorists don’t get their way at all times, they have the power to throw their tremendous weight around and turn millions of lives upside down in a matter of minutes and, as they have shown, they have no hesitation in executing that power, no matter how many millions of lives they destroy.

http://buchanan.org/blog/high-frequency-terrorism-how-the-big-banks-and-federal-reserve-maintained-their-death-grip-over-the-united-states-4048

 

[catdd]

Bankers and special interest lobbies - they carry our elected officials around in their pockets, like so many nickles and dimes.

 

[Travlyr]

CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission and international banksters...

And the education system & the media...

 

[romacox]

And through the IMF they have gained control of much of the World Economy. They have duped many foreign countries into joining their "Global Economy" by calling it capitalism. It is anything but capitalism.

 

[osan]

Try not to think of it as "who is leading us".

They are at war with each other. A couple dirty little factions, and it isnt democrats or republicans either, its more like this group of bankers, goldman sachs, bilderberg group, european rothchilds, etc, all at war with each other...

Upon what evidence do you base this assertion? I am disagreeing with you necessarily, but I would like to know upon what facts does the opinion rest.

I have a slightly different view on this question. I fully well agree that Bilderberg, IMF, World Bank, Federal Reserve Bank, etc. are visible manifestations of the elite establishment, but I see no reason to believe that it is comprised of fundamentally differing factions. That would make no sense, given the control in question, the risks of being fragmented in the manner suggested, and that the pie is so damned large. Unity of broad purposes would, IMO, be the central pillar upon which such power would rest, be cultivated, and grown across the span of generations. One does not position themselves as a supreme global power by acting like an imbecile, and infighting would be clearly imbecilic behavior, IMO.

Being human beings, no doubt they have their disagreements on details, but if they are not complete fools, they keep those at bay for another time when airing such differences becomes appropriate. But right now, today, there are other fish to fry (you and me) and reason clearly dictates the cultivation of a strong unity between these different "families", to use Godfather parlance.

The people in the worst situaion out there are those that have no resources and have no slave master.

Could you elaborate on this? It is not quite reaching me.

 

[Carson]

Ron Paul - The American Power Structure (1988)

That video is a real keeper.

Thanks spaceship_earth

 

[heavenlyboy34]

That video is a real keeper.

Thanks spaceship_earth

Amazing that he's been right for so many years, yet few choose to listen to him.

 

[Lord Xar]

Renaissance 2.0: Lesson 1 - Revisiting American History - Financial Empire

YouTube - Renaissance 2.0: Lesson 1 - Revisiting American History - Financial Empire

He doesn't name WHO the "owners" are, I wish he would. But very interesting nonetheless.

 

[catdd]

Who really rules in USA ?


Israel

 

[Pauls' Revere]

THAT'S CLASSIFIED !!

YouTube - ANNUNAKI REPTILIANS, "CLASSIFIED"

 

[Phantom]

AIPAC: The Voice of America

 

[Kludge]

Kludge.

Not yet...... - still looking for the perfect cave.

 

[Theocrat]

A Deeper Question

I ask as non American ?

Who really rules in USA ?

What's your opinion?

The question is not "Who rules the USA," but "What rules the USA?"

 

[DAFTEK]

http://www.aipac.org/

 

[sevin]

We are going to have to regain control of our currency before we can regain control of our country.

One of the truest statements I've ever read. The search for my new sig is over!

 

[Zulator]

Whoever controls the money. THere is not one solid group. Just as in WWII the fascists thought the best way to rule the world was through force, the Fabian socialists thought incrementalism was the way to go. All I know is, it's not "we the people".

 

[Mattsa]

Whoever controls the money. THere is not one solid group. Just as in WWII the fascists thought the best way to rule the world was through force, the Fabian socialists thought incrementalism was the way to go. All I know is, it's not "we the people".

Absolutely.

The British ruling class have developed 'non'violent' ways to control people, subtle mind control and most importantly DEBT!

To be in DEBT is to be in FEAR.

Debt is a most powerful weapon to exercise political and social control without using physical violence.

Quite incredible that so many people accept debt based money without understanding the primary reason for it.

 

[raistlinkishtar]

Wow, a lot of people said AIPAC. I believe that they are near the heart of the problem facing America. However, you've also got other heads of the hydra to slay like the ADL, B'nai Brith, Federal Reserve cartel, etc.

 

[Seraphim]

Renaissance 2.0: Lesson 1 - Revisiting American History - Financial Empire

YouTube - Renaissance 2.0: Lesson 1 - Revisiting American History - Financial Empire

He doesn't name WHO the "owners" are, I wish he would. But very interesting nonetheless.[/QUOTE]

It is irrelevant.

Have you seen the movie "The Interenational"? There are two scenes in that movie that strike me as very relevant in the real world. 1) the (Swedish?) banker who says to Clive Owen "shooting me will do nothing, another banker will take my place" and 2) the old Russian dude in the interogation room with Clive Owen says something like "The reason this cannot be defeated is that everyone is involved- The CIA, EU, governments worldwide etc"

My point is, that the WHO matters not. The means, the HOW is what matters. Get rid of the WHO while the HOW remains ensures that another head of the dragon will pop up. Get rid of the HOW and the WHO become irrelevant.