Who did you vote for in 2004?

Who'd you vote for?

  • Bush - Cheney (Republican)

    Votes: 50 24.8%
  • Kerry - Edwards (Democratic)

    Votes: 19 9.4%
  • Nader - Camejo (independant)

    Votes: 10 5.0%
  • Badnarik - Campagna (Libertarian)

    Votes: 30 14.9%
  • Peroutka - Baldwin (Constitution)

    Votes: 10 5.0%
  • Cobb - LaMarche (Green)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Democratic in primary, none in general

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other 3rd party not listed

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Chose not to vote

    Votes: 28 13.9%
  • Too young to vote

    Votes: 55 27.2%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    202
(Badnarik) Proud to say I've never voted for anyone who became president.
 
Never voted for anyone prior to RP in the primary. I considered voting to be act of violence that violates the non-aggression principle.
 
Bush. Under the "our muppet isn't as much of a muppet as the other team's muppet" argument.

I was aware of the LP.
In 2004, this is the way the LP was presenting itself:
"We don't push for abortions but we're A-OK with them, and we're anti government but we're going to use as case examples the USCG and other agencies which have a measurable benefit to society instead of the totally asinine ones."

Hey, come to think of it, that hasn't changed.
 
Had it not been for the debates, my first vote ever would have been for Kerry, but then I decided to just not vote. I didn't have internet at that time, so I didn't know about anyone else.

Though, also, that's when I started noticing some very peculiar behaviors in both parties that "really" seemed to purposefully compromise their candidacy to favor the other candidate...At least that's the way I felt in both 2004 and 2008. It felt odd, very very odd the way McCain and Kerry's campaign went.
 
I think this poll shows where our outreach efforts should be...registered and likely Republican voters.

Ive been saying this forever as a former.

They need to be educated on the cause of wars/history and the sinister reasoning behind them.

The neocon crowd needs to be targeted. Many dont even know theyre neocons. They see themselves as "patriots" because they believe what Fox news and Rush Limbaugh tells them. This is how the (re)takeover of the Republican party is going to happen.
 
Ive been saying this forever as a former.

They need to be educated on the cause of wars/history and the sinister reasoning behind them.

The neocon crowd needs to be targeted. Many dont even know theyre neocons. They see themselves as "patriots" because they believe what Fox news and Rush Limbaugh tells them. This is how the (re)takeover of the Republican party is going to happen.

I don't know. Something tells me that most neocons are too blood-drunk and are a lost cause. Too many of them are just too consumed by militarism and nationalism masked as "patriotism" which you mentioned.
 
I found myself looking up arguments FOR the war just to defend George Bush. I came across Ron Paul from youtube videos during summer of 2008. I still voted for McCain and I regret it everyday. Since then I have unlatched myself from the clutches of rank and file voting, and found adventure and truth amidst independent thinking.

This post made me think of this:
14e2lqe.jpg
 
Bump.

Excellent poll.

Is there a "Who did you vote for in 2008" floating around?

Might be able to use the 'growth of liberty voters' as a talking point.

All the new members here are certainly encouraging.:)





Bunkloco
 
2000 Bush - In October 2004 (1 month before voting day) I decided to vote for Peroutka of the Constitution Party - even though he was a write in candidate
 
Lessee here...

1984 - Reagan.

1988 - Abstained. At sea. (Should have voted Paul, IIRC the LP wasn't on the NJ ballot. ?)

1992 - Wrote in Pat Buchanan absentee.

1996 - Wrote in Pat Buchanan absentee.

2000 - W (God help me for that. I must have been drunk and on drugs.)

2004 - Badnarik absentee.

2008 - Wrote in Paul absentee.

2012 - Will write in Paul, regardless of what happens.
 
Back
Top