phill4paul
Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Messages
- 46,967
Either way I don't like him.
When shit like this is going on you don't air dirty laundry unless you have an agenda.
Either way I don't like him.
When shit like this is going on you don't air dirty laundry unless you have an agenda.
I don't fedbook, could one of you who does please give a synopsis?
This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated.
Sorry about that.
The account for that YouTube video has now been 86'ed.
What I find most interesting about the "Bombshell" video is how the guy in the black shirt is trying to force the issue on splitting the group by having people vote that Stewart and pals are deserters who will not be "allowed" back on the property. Why is this Jerry DeLemus meekly following? He was supposed to be the head of ranch security. That the guy in the black shirt is pushing that raises red flags for me.
Now, where is Stewart and why silent?
I've posted about all there is of significance on THAT facebook page. In other words: not much. (is it even the real ok page? there is another one that is a closed group https://www.facebook.com/groups/OathkeeperPatriots/ and zillion other pages with the name Oath Keeper in the name)
The man running that "meeting" in the black shirt is a cointel agent.
Either way I don't like him.
Anyone publicly airing any internal disagreements is a cointel agent, or at the very least a moron and should be marked as such.
I think what's happening here is .. America never had to do anything quite like this for hundreds of years .. emotions are running high and ego's are setting in. That dude in the black shirt in the video sounds to me like a plant.
I dunno pcosmar ... just giving my opinion.
Maybe because I'm a lady, I dunno. But, dude in the black shirt saying his group will shoot OathKeepers in the back if they return .. kinda got my panties in a bunch. Just saying.
Thursday afternoon, DeLemus was warning others not to come to Bunkerville because “we don’t want an escalation.”
DeLemus said, if a confrontation was to unfold, they would likely be obliterated by federal firepower. DeLemus said he is concerned that more people would enter harm’s way if the number of activists keeps swelling at the Bundy Ranch.
“We’d be able to bloody their noses a little … but we wouldn’t stand a chance,” DeLemus said.
A rather interesting lack of confidence for someone who has just taken charge, and assumed control, over all personnel except the Bundy family.
DeLemus didn’t arrive until well after that event, though upon reporting to the Militia Liaison, and he was delegated to assist Bill Keebler in maintaining organization within the militia camp. DeLemus then “relieved Keebler of “command”, asserting his authority over the entire militia contingent. In subsequent efforts for the Militia Liaison to work with, and pass direction on, from the Bundys, he was responded to with, “These are my guys, you must go through me if you’d like access to them”; “This is my camp and this is my command”; and “Just stay away from here.” Clearly, this late comer, who arrived after the Saturday event, has no known militia ties, had wrested control of the militia operation, even to the point of ignoring the Militia Liaison, which had been the means of communication and of the Bundys means of seeking assistance or requesting any activity of the militia contingent. Rather scary that what had functioned so well, all the way up to and beyond the Saturday event, was now being taken over by someone that had no dog in the fight, and was unwilling to relinquish any “power” that he had assumed, if to the extent of the previously fluid communication between the Bundys and the militia.
Now, to understand the role of the Militia Liaison, first established and approved by the Bundys. The Militia Liaison arrived at the ranch on April 8. He met with Cliven Bundy and explained that Operation Mutual Aid (OMA) had sent requests for militia to come to the ranch, and he had come to coordinate their activity. It was agreed that he would be the interface (liaison) between the family and the militia, and he agreed that a force of volunteers would could serve in the capacity of a Security Team (Personal Security Detail – PSD), to provide immediate protection for the family. These, however, would be detached for the militia contingent, while serving in that capacity.
Soo...
Put a tail on blackshirt and find out who his handler is?
I understand, from the militia liaison, that the problem has been resolved, and the Jerry DeLemus has become cooperative and agreed to a shared command -- working well with others.
I am pleased that this turned out the way that it did, and I Applaud Jerry for his change of tactic and realizing that the responsibility, and command, must be shared by those able to demonstrate their abilities to participate, together, to achieve the objective.
As difficult as this troublesome as this subject has become, it was a discussion that had to take place. We may not have time to address this at the next event, so with this now openly on the table, we have an example of cooperation that will serve to avoid the same, in the future.
So, again, my applause to Jerry and to all of the others who participated in finding a solution to a problem, that could have, in the future, been very destructive.
Gary Hunt, Outpost of Freedom