What do you think of Ramaswamy?

A blatant attempt by Ramaswampy to cover-up Donald's close ties to CNN?!?
.
David Boies is best known for representing Al Gore regarding (stopping) the recount of the votes in Florida, to ensure that George W. Bush became US president in 2001.
In one of those strange coincidences, the lawyer that represented George W. Bush in this trial, Theodore B. Olson, was asked to join the Trump administration.
After Olson declined, he represented CNN-reporter Jim Acosta (in a desparate attempt to convince the gullible public that the CNN of Trump crony Jeff Zucker is really anti-Trump).
.
See Zucker, Donald and Melania in 2004.
1cc41b3935b596fa5e44cc4fc10b2f0688b04bdf.jpg
Bronfman-controlled-Cult-Leader-Arrested-For-Sex-Trafficking
 
If I were to be a fraud, the narrative I would choose would not be that of the minority it would be that of the masses that are ready to swallow up my B.S...

Pretty dumb to be a fraud on such a rhetoric. So basically those that claim he is a fraud are saying that he is trying to deceive this tiny voting population that nobody listens to?

Fraud or not. His message needs to be heard and no one else is delivering it. If we say the guy bursting out at the Hillary event is delivering a useful message then so is Ramaswamy.
 
If I were to be a fraud, the narrative I would choose would not be that of the minority it would be that of the masses that are ready to swallow up my B.S...

Pretty dumb to be a fraud on such a rhetoric. So basically those that claim he is a fraud are saying that he is trying to deceive this tiny voting population that nobody listens to?

Fraud or not. His message needs to be heard and no one else is delivering it. If we say the guy bursting out at the Hillary event is delivering a useful message then so is Ramaswamy.

It's all about the money, he wants contributions to his campaign which he will keep after he loses or drops out.
He can't go for the major supporter camps because they already have champions they are donating too, so he goes for the largest unrepresented camp he can find.
 
I like what he has to say and the fact that he has the courage to say it.

Who is running for office with a better narrative?
Exactly.

Do I trust him? No, because he has never held office and is unproven. Also his delivery and demeanor is not very appealing to be honest, but he has the best positions of any of the candidates.
 
My earlier answer was too simplistic. Vivek is a plus.

Ramaswamy says a lot of the right things and makes good arguments. It's just that a scant few times, I've heard him say things that make me doubt he means what he says about the concept of liberty so I distrust him.

For the most part, he spreads a good message cleverly, and has the gift for being able to widen the debate, forcing others to acknowledge issues they prefer to pretend don't exist. It shocks people who expected to get off easier. He's the best at the debates. (Clearly Nikki Haley is this election's John McCain.)

I don't expect him to win the nomination, but Vivek's being there is helpful to liberty and bad for neocons.
At least for now, I'm thankful he's there.
 
Ramaswamy says a lot of the right things and makes good arguments. It's just that a scant few times, I've heard him say things that make me doubt he means what he says about the concept of liberty so I distrust him.

For the most part, he spreads a good message cleverly, and has the gift for being able to widen the debate, forcing others to acknowledge issues they prefer to pretend don't exist. It shocks people who expected to get off easier. He's the best at the debates. (Clearly Nikki Haley is this election's John McCain.)

I don't expect him to win the nomination, but Vivek's being there is helpful to liberty and bad for neocons.
At least for now, I'm thankful he's there.

An objective assessment and I agree. Messages are not being carried by ideal messengers but they're still important messages to be delivered. Anything to drown out the corporate media narrative is a boon.
 
Back
Top