Trump's Hate Speech Will Get You Deported EO

I wouldn't say Ron Paul is a globalist by intention, but some of his policies do lead to outcomes favored by the globalists.

And yes Trump is a globalist certainly. Less so than most of his Presidential peers, but still certainly a globalist.

There's a difference between global trade [Ron Paul/me], and global governance [Trump/Israel/Technocrats/Schwab].
 
Last edited:
There's a difference between global trade [Ron Paul and me], and global governance [Trump/Israel/Technocrats/Schwab].

I understand and recognize that difference.

High levels of global trade does have a tendency, however, to lead to global governance.

I am positive that such an outcome would not be Ron Paul's intention. It is an outcome nonetheless.

And to be fair to Trump, the small amount of globalism that Trump has displayed, is mostly in the meddling of other countries affairs (namely: Israel). He has done an otherwise better-than-expected job of withdrawing us from various global governance agreements.
 
I wouldn't say Ron Paul is a globalist by intention, but some of his policies do lead to outcomes favored by the globalists.

And yes Trump is a globalist certainly. Less so than most of his Presidential peers, but still certainly a globalist.

I would say that Ron Paul's globalist characterization for any of his policies, is only due to partial consideration thereof (i.e. cherry-picking things out of context).

I would also say that Trump's credibility as "less globalist" is simply due to the fact that he lies better and more frequently than his predecessors.

I believe the evidence shows he's qualitatively no different than his predecessors on the immigration issue.

Trump has just been really good at casting himself as a victim.

It is the WORLD as a whole that wants "globalism lite", a.k.a. the "multipolar" new world order. Trump wants 100% global hegemony Israeli style. We aren't "moving away from globalism". We're going all in with the sinking ship called Israel, and will likely go down with them, and Europe will likely betray and turn on us.

Trump's job isn't to fix things, it's to put the blindfold on Americans as we walk to our death side-by-side with the Zio-state.
 
I understand and recognize that difference.

High levels of global trade does have a tendency, however, to lead to global governance.

I am positive that such an outcome would not be Ron Paul's intention. It is an outcome nonetheless.

And to be fair to Trump, the small amount of globalism that Trump has displayed, is mostly in the meddling of other countries affairs (namely: Israel). He has done an otherwise better-than-expected job of withdrawing us from various global governance agreements.

Trump being an Billionaire Opportunist, an Israel loyalist, and cozying up to the CIA-Technocratic Network, it is only a matter of time before his eliminating(?) regulations [a good thing] and "withdrawing" from agreements will then be handed off to the mentioned Technocrats in the form of Globalist Public-Private Partnerships. This will restrict/eliminate government accountability [bad thing] by the public, due to "proprietary information". Not that we haven't been moving in that direction already, but it will in fact get worse to the point that it is permanently cemented into our society. That is when the Globalist New World Order enforced by Regional Governance will be realized.

And then you'll be like "secession"? To where???
 
Last edited:
I would say that Ron Paul's globalist characterization for any of his policies, is only due to partial consideration thereof (i.e. cherry-picking things out of context).

I would also say that Trump's credibility as "less globalist" is simply due to the fact that he lies better and more frequently than his predecessors.

I believe the evidence shows he's qualitatively no different than his predecessors on the immigration issue.

I am not sure how one would go about lying about withdrawing from global climate accords, or similar such agreements.

My characterization of Trump as less globalist is based on his actions only as I've been around enough to know that words mean nothing.
 
Trump being an Billionaire Opportunist, an Israel loyalist, and cozying up to the CIA-Technocratic Network, it is only a matter of time before his eliminating(?) regulations [a good thing] and "withdrawing" from agreements will then be handed off to the mentioned Technocrats in the form of Globalist Public-Private Partnerships.

I have no idea what you just said.

And then you'll be like "secession?". To where???

Then I'll be like secession? I'm like secession, now :cool:
 
I am not sure how one would go about lying about withdrawing from global climate accords, or similar such agreements.

My characterization of Trump as less globalist is based on his actions only as I've been around enough to know that words mean nothing.

The lie is that it matters. Trump withdrew from Paris Agreement in first term. Then Biden reversed, and then Trump re-withdrew.

Trump "re-withdrew" on three other agreements.

When the guard changes, we will probably be back in again.

Some of Trumps 2016 term withdrawals were NOT reversed by Biden. Does this make Biden less globalist than Obama?

Trump just wants good public image, just like any useless politician. Sitting at his desk signing papers he doesn't read that will simply be reversed when it's politically convenient for the next liar, is the easiest way to do that.

To do the real job of peace and justice, and control our military adventurism is something a real Chritsian man like Paul would do. But real Christian men aren't allowed in the ZOG.
 
The lie is that it matters. Trump withdrew from Paris Agreement in first term. Then Biden reversed, and then Trump re-withdrew.

Trump "re-withdrew" on three other agreements.

When the guard changes, we will probably be back in again.

Some of Trumps 2016 term withdrawals were NOT reversed by Biden. Does this make Biden less globalist than Obama?

Trump just wants good public image, just like any useless politician. Sitting at his desk signing papers he doesn't read that will simply be reversed when it's politically convenient for the next liar, is the easiest way to do that.

To do the real job of peace and justice, and control our military adventurism is something a real Chritsian man like Paul would do. But real Christian men aren't allowed in the ZOG.

Valid points, but doesn't change the fact that Trump is considerably less globalist than someone like Kamala.

If Trump's withdrawal's don't matter, the new agreements that Kamala would make certainly would matter.

But you're right, it's mostly just tinkering about the edges.

The true measure of globalism vs anti globalism is one's position on the right to secession. I don't think Trump has said either way, but it's a pretty solid guess which way he would lean.
 
Ron Paul's policys on their own aren't exactly globalist.

His foreign policy of non intervention would have seen a collapse in the global order.

There's no globalism without order.

Free trade under our current system of global order though, without changing our foreign policy would be a disaster.

It would lead to likely a Chinese communist globalism. China would get to dictate to our government what we do in our country.

They would control what are allowed to say. The balance of power wouldn't exist. They would control the truth.

If you hold a gun and I hold a gun, we can talk about the law. If you hold a knife and I hold a knife, we can talk about rules. If you come empty-handed, and I come empty-handed, we can talk about reason. But if you hold a gun and I only have a knife, then the truth lies in your hand.
 
LOL

Cry harder, America hater.
If America is worthy of hate for the actions of its elected officials, it should be pointed out and corrected and it's officials impeached.

If this nation is "Christian" as you say, the bible teaches that if you don't correct sin you are the real hater.

In other words, people who buy into American exceptionalism and excuse America's evil are the real haters of America, and those who point out its evil are those who truly love their country and their fellow countrymen.
 
If America is worthy of hate for the actions of its elected officials, it should be pointed out and corrected and it's officials impeached.

If this nation is "Christian" as you say, the bible teaches that if you don't correct sin you are the real hater.

In other words, people who buy into American exceptionalism and excuse America's evil are the real haters of America, and those who point out its evil are those who truly love their country and their fellow countrymen.
You are are the one going around making excuses for evil like Hamas, and you lie about Trump and America because of your hate.
I have never claimed Trump or America are perfect, nobody is perfect.
 
If America is worthy of hate for the actions of its elected officials, it should be pointed out and corrected and it's officials impeached.

If this nation is "Christian" as you say, the bible teaches that if you don't correct sin you are the real hater.

In other words, people who buy into American exceptionalism and excuse America's evil are the real haters of America, and those who point out its evil are those who truly love their country and their fellow countrymen.
We are supposed to change our government because some foreigners hate us?

Is that how you think it works? Other people from other countries get to choose our government?

What kind of foolish people changes their own government because terrorists hate it?

I checked the manual for changing the government and it doesn't say anything about terrorists hating it.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

...Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes;

You let me know if the terrorists manual has it. I don't have a book on sharia law.
 
Back
Top