Gary Johnson [Video] Gary Johnson wants troops in Uganda but not Libya

He doesn't want to ban flag burning or militarize the border. Nice try.

Oh, contraire. He submitted an amendment that would allow states to ban flag burning.

You also says on his website that we need to bring the troops home and strengthen the border IN THE SAME SENTENCE. What do you think that means?

Nationalist. Statist. Anti-Freedom.

What Gary Johnson called "a waste of time and resources".
 
Oh, contraire. He submitted an amendment that would allow states to ban flag burning.

You also says on his website that we need to bring the troops home and strengthen the border IN THE SAME SENTENCE. What do you think that means?

Nationalist. Statist. Anti-Freedom.

What Gary Johnson called "a waste of time and resources".

You're really a terrible advocate for Johnson. Hope the moderators let you stay for awhile.

Ron Paul wants the states to decide issues like flag burning and abortion. Always has, always will. Did he file any bills for a federal ban on flag burning? No.

Most here also support secure borders. Johnson's position on this is another reason why he bombed so badly in the GOP primary and why he's now spinning his tires in the Libertarian party on his way to a 0.6% or whatever showing in November.
 
He specifically proposed and amendment that would allow states to ban flag-burning.

Why would he do that?!? If I buy a flag, I can't burn my own property?

Ron wants to stop abortion any way he can. That's FINE, but that's hardly LIBERTARIAN.

I am anti-abortion, but I don't think we can solve our problems by fighting over it. We need to grow up as a society before we can ban it. The fetus IS a human, but it is also a human 100% reliant on another person who is burdened with its care. There is no good answer. To save one life, you must shackle another.

I have a friend who had an abortion because the baby had Down's. They only ever wanted one baby, so they tried again and had a beautiful healthy girl. If they hadn't aborted one, the other wouldn't be alive. One can also say that what makes us who we are is our thought and memory. A fetus doesn't have that yet. Human, but not sentient. Devil's advoctate.
 
Oh, contraire. He submitted an amendment that would allow states to ban flag burning.

You also says on his website that we need to bring the troops home and strengthen the border IN THE SAME SENTENCE. What do you think that means?

Nationalist. Statist. Anti-Freedom.

What Gary Johnson called "a waste of time and resources".

Saw your rant against Rothbard and Voluntaryism/an-cap in another thread, and now you're calling a Rothbardian a statist. lolol

The amendment came during a debate around flag burning. Read his speech when he proposed it.
 
Saw your rant against Rothbard and Voluntaryism/an-cap in another thread, and now you're calling a Rothbardian a statist. lolol

The amendment came during a debate around flag burning. Read his speech when he proposed it.

No, I'm saying that Ron Paul is not a true "Rothbardian" (Are the Klingonians going to attack him?)

Nor are Paulbots. They DEMAND that people follow Rothbard to the letter when they themselves do not. Remember, Rothbard was a racist, bigot and called women who wanted to vote "lesbians". I think he made some other really terrible comments over his career. He believes that women should be able to sell their children.

Also, most Paulbots don't know know Ludwig von Mises' name and keep calling him "Mises". That's pretty hilarious!!!

As for the flag burning thing, it DOESN'T MATTER. The Constitution protects freedom of speech. Buring a flag is specifically that. And even if you say it is political action are you saying that the states should be able to ban you from damaging something you bought at the store? I can buy a bottle of champagne and break it over the bow of a ship. Is he going to make an amendment for that? Does he believe in property rights or NOT?
 
Last edited:
Updated with new working video. If you watch Garys body language, you'll notice the guy has no backbone and is pushed around eaily. Supporting the Uganda invasion but not Libya suggests that Gary is only against his 'humanitarian' wars if it becomes unpopular. He has no solid beliefs.
 
No, I'm saying that Ron Paul is not a true "Rothbardian" (Are the Klingonians going to attack him?)

Nor are Paulbots. They DEMAND that people follow Rothbard to the letter when they themselves do not. Remember, Rothbard was a racist, bigot and called women who wanted to vote "lesbians". I think he made some other really terrible comments over his career. He believes that women should be able to sell their children.

Also, most Paulbots don't know know Ludwig von Mises' name and keep calling him "Mises". That's pretty hilarious!!!

As for the flag burning thing, it DOESN'T MATTER. The Constitution protects freedom of speech. Buring a flag is specifically that. And even if you say it is political action are you saying that the states should be able to ban you from damaging something you bought at the store? I can buy a bottle of champagne and break it over the bow of a ship. Is he going to make an amendment for that? Does he believe in property rights or NOT?

I can't tell if you're serious or a troll.
 
Updated with new working video. If you watch Garys body language, you'll notice the guy has no backbone and is pushed around eaily. Supporting the Uganda invasion but not Libya suggests that Gary is only against his 'humanitarian' wars if it becomes unpopular. He has no solid beliefs.

Yes, two decades of the same "no solid beliefs".

Does Ron Paul want to militarize the border or not? Ban flag burning or not? Build a border fence or not? End the fed or audit the fed? I just can't remember any more!
 
Yes, two decades of the same "no solid beliefs".

Does Ron Paul want to militarize the border or not? Ban flag burning or not? Build a border fence or not? End the fed or audit the fed? I just can't remember any more!

grasping-at-straws.jpg
 
On election day, it will be 1%-to2%, if that. Gary is a bad candidate for President. Would have been great in the Senate though.

Remember: Barr was polling at 7% in 2008 before he finished with 0.4% of the vote.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/20500.html

Polls of third party candidates are always grossly inflated. People desire to vote for them, but never actually do so. The Libertarian party's high-water mark in presidential elections is 1.1%, and that was over thirty years ago in 1980. Johnson won't tie or beat that, most likely.
 
Last edited:
Updated with new working video. If you watch Garys body language, you'll notice the guy has no backbone and is pushed around eaily.

I hear most triathletes are wimps.

In stark contrast, feast your eyes on Rand Paul's steely spine:


Originally Posted by phill4paul
Basically, Rand says that he was forced...

Originally Posted by TheGrinchWhoStoleDC
...this is a small concession you have to make...

Originally Posted by ctiger2
...Rand HAD TO ENDORSE BEFORE THE KY CONVENTION...

Originally Posted by tsai3904
He said he thinks the Chairmanship of each state Republican party must...

Originally Posted by tsai3904
...it's something HE had to do...

Originally Posted by TheGrinchWhoStoleDC
...If he hadn't made the endorsement, then the door would have been closed on...

Originally Posted by TheGrinchWhoStoleDC
...If he didn't make the endorsement, then the door would have closed completely for...

...you have to blend into the republican party, or they're going to push you out...

Originally Posted by brooks009
...Rand did what he needed to do to...

Originally Posted by qh4dotcom
I can reluctantly accept the fact that Rand had to make the endorsement...


My personal fave:

Originally Posted by ShowMeLiberty
...It takes a rare kind of courage to do such a thing..
.
 
I hear most triathletes are wimps.

In stark contrast, feast your eyes on Rand Paul's steely spine:

Because being a triathelete makes you a complete boss at politics, right? And Why do you keep bringing up Rand? We're all individuals here, stop putting us into a single group who unanimously support Rand.
 
Also, most Paulbots don't know know Ludwig von Mises' name and keep calling him "Mises". That's pretty hilarious!!!

Huh? What the hell does that even mean? His last name was "von Mises", so how is calling him Mises showing that they don't know his last name?

So does the Mises Institute -> http://www.mises.org not know his name too?

Someone should tell them I guess. :rolleyes:
 
Because being a triathelete makes you a complete boss at politics, right? And Why do you keep bringing up Rand? We're all individuals here, stop putting us into a single group who unanimously support Rand.


I keep lumping Gary Johnson Bashers with Rand Paul Supporters because RON PAUL WILL NOT BE ON THE BALLOT, AND RAND NOW EFFECTIVELY SUPPORTS ROMNEY.

Gary Johnson Bashers are holding him up against RON Paul, but Ron Paul is OUT OF CONTENTION.

Gary Johnson's opposing candidates are notably BARACK OBAMA and MITT ROMNEY, with Rand of the 2016 aspirations endorsing Romney.
 
Huh? What the hell does that even mean? His last name was "von Mises", so how is calling him Mises showing that they don't know his last name?

So does the Mises Institute -> http://www.mises.org not know his name too?

Someone should tell them I guess. :rolleyes:

It should be "vonMises.org" if anything. Yeah, someone should tell them so they and their followers don't look silly when they're telling everyone how much more they know than everyone else.
 
Back
Top