Pauls' Revere
Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2007
- Messages
- 11,347
You would think people would have more sense than to name a military vessel after the idiot who already destroyed one.
You would be correct. Naval tradition holds to not name a vessel after one that has sunk, or one that may harbor bad influence/luck. Likewise, ships/vessel names should not have sinkable namesakes in their name. For example, a ship named "Leadbottom" is asking for disaster. Naval tradition is very superstitious this way. Consider the post by Swordsmyth that the ship took damage to her Port which incidently is McCains affected side.