so.. we're going to now 'politicize' and make it into a 'South China Sea' confrontation...
and deflect the public away from asking the
'How was this possible' questions.
Navy Does Not Rule Out Intentional Act in Latest Warship Collision
http://freebeacon.com/national-secu...out-intentional-act-latest-warship-collision/
The Navy has not ruled out an intentional action behind the latest deadly collision
between a Navy destroyer and a merchant ship, the chief of naval operations told reporters Monday.
"That's is certainly something we are giving full consideration to
but we have no indication that that's the case—yet," Adm. John Richardson, the CNO, said at the Pentagon.
--------
MOAR MONEY!
A Navy official said budget cuts and fiscal uncertainty as a result of the Budget Control Act of 2011 limiting defense funds may be to blame.
"As a result of decades of not having a competitor to drive fleet focus, high tempo and fiscal uncertainty and under funding, we are seeing fraying in surface and aviation," the official said. "By this review, the CNO wants to see how bad it is and then quickly address it."
--------
On the possibility that China may have triggered the collision, naval analysts say
Chinese military writings routinely discuss combined electronic and cyber warfare in high-technology conflict.
The Chinese military intends to use its integrated network and electronic warfare to extend the reach of cyber attacks to isolated battlefield networks in space and on the seas as a component of future warfighting plans.
--------
ALWAYS BLAME THE CAPTAIN
The Navy traditionally adopts a strict policy of accountability for all ship mishaps.
On Friday, the two senior officers on the Fitzgerald were relieved of duty, and about a dozen other sailors who were on watch the night of the collision were punished.
A preliminary report on the Fitzgerald collision provided no details on the cause of the incident.