Trump's Hate Speech Will Get You Deported EO

[nikcers]

These people are here legally, even if they're not citizens.

And they're being deported for criticizing Izrael.

Fuck Izrael.

They are foreign nationals. That's why this is considered foreign policy and not law enforcement.

We gave them permission to study here and then revoked that permission because they were a threat to national security.

That's the job that we pay the government to do. The primary role of government. Trump was popularly elected to do it.

 

[acptulsa]

We gave them permission to study here and then revoked that permission because they were a threat to national security.

They were what threat to what nation's security, Zionbot?

They're no threat to my security.

 

[nikcers]

They were what threat to what nation's security, Zionbot?

They're no threat to my security.

To the United States national security.

The Antisemitism Awareness Act passed the United States House of Representatives 320–91 and it would broaden the legal definition of antisemitism to include anti-Zionism.

The United States government voted and they are on the side of Israel.

 

[Swordsmyth]

This is 100% about criticism of Izrael.

A complete dismantling and usurpation of the First Amendment to protect a foreign enemy State, which has hijacked this country.

That false narrative has already been debunked by by me.

They are not charging them with their crimes because then they would then have to let them stay and go through trials.
They are deporting them and letting them off easy on the crimes.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Here's the op-ed that is Trump's reason for deporting Rumeysa Oztürk.

What in this op-ed is something a person in the US on any kind of visa should get deported for saying?

Op-ed: Try again, President Kumar: Renewing calls for Tufts to adopt March 4 TCU Senate resolutions - The Tufts Daily

The independent student newspaper of Tufts University

www.tuftsdaily.com

The protesters are committing crimes, and they also have no right to agitate for foreign causes or demand US institutions do anything.
They have clear ties to terrorists and foreign adversary intelligence services.

They have no right to be here and we have every right to deport them, that doesn't violate their right to speech, they were allowed to speak and they were not charged with their crimes let alone their speech.
It certainly is not threat to the speech of citizens.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Your child brings another child over to play in your home, the neighbor kid starts yelling and screaming about his parents' divorce and demanding you take the side of his preferred parent, then he begins breaking the furniture, finally you have had enough and throw him out.

That's what is going on here and yet we have idiots saying the kid has a right to be in your home and do what he did.

 

[acptulsa]

To the United States national security.

The Antisemitism Awareness Act passed the United States House of Representatives 320–91 and it would broaden the legal definition of antisemitism to include anti-Zionism.

And you think that keeps us all safe in our beds at night because...?

 

[acptulsa]

That false narrative has already been debunked by by me.

Bunk.

 

[acptulsa]

They have clear ties to terrorists and foreign adversary intelligence services.

So does Trump.

 

[Swordsmyth]

So does Trump.

LOLOLOLOLOL


My sides hurt.

 

[acptulsa]

Your child brings another child over to play in your home, the neighbor kid starts yelling and screaming about his parents' divorce and demanding you take the side of his preferred parent, then he begins breaking the furniture, finally you have had enough and throw him out.

That's what is going on here and yet we have idiots saying the kid has a right to be in your home and do what he did.

Yeah, that's awful.

Hear that, Knickerbot? Israel has no right to come here and buy our Congress.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Yeah, that's awful.

Hear that, Knickerbot? Israel has no right to come here and buy our Congress.

No, they don't either, but I'm not about to allow both siblings from the neighbor's household to come fight in our house and destroy it.
I'm throwing out whichever one I can and I'll work on the other one after that.

You are claiming that we must allow the whole family to come here and wreck our stuff.

In fact, you want to invite the whole neighborhood over to have a massive brawl over all their grievances.

 

[acptulsa]

No, they don't either, but I'm not about to allow both siblings from the neighbor's household to come fight in our house and destroy it.
I'm throwing out whichever one I can...

We could throw both out. It isn't happening because one side can afford Trump, and the other can't.

 

[Swordsmyth]

We could throw both out. It isn't happening because one side can afford Trump, and the other can't.

We can't throw Israel out yet, they own both parties except for a few dissidents and Trump has to work with the better factions of them to get in office, stay in office, and get the good things done he's doing.
Meanwhile the good things he's doing are helping pry their grip lose.

 

[acptulsa]

Meanwhile the good things he's doing are helping pry their grip lose.

As usual, your reassurances are so bland and purposely vague, they're insulting.

What is he doing, and how does it accomplish that?

 

[Invisible Man]

The protesters are committing crimes, and they also have no right to agitate for foreign causes or demand US institutions do anything.
They have clear ties to terrorists and foreign adversary intelligence services.

They have no right to be here and we have every right to deport them, that doesn't violate their right to speech, they were allowed to speak and they were not charged with their crimes let alone their speech.
It certainly is not threat to the speech of citizens.

Notice that you, too, did not answer the question I asked.

Please quote the part of the op-ed I posted that was a crime. Of if Ozturk was deported for some other crime, then: 1. what specific crime was that? 2. how do you know? and 3. if there was some other reason besides this op-ed, why did Rubio defend the deportation by saying that this op-ed was the same as starting a riot?

 

[acptulsa]

1. what specific crime was that?

As I understand it, pitching a tent on a college quad and threatening to sleep in it.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Notice that you, too, did not answer the question I asked.

Please quote the part of the op-ed I posted that was a crime. Of if Ozturk was deported for some other crime, then: 1. what specific crime was that? 2. how do you know? and 3. if there was some other reason besides this op-ed, why did Rubio defend the deportation by saying that this op-ed was the same as starting a riot?

That op-ed is a red herring, and you don't get to declare it is the reason for the deportation.

But I did in fact respond to it:

> they also have no right to agitate for foreign causes or demand US institutions do anything.

 

[Swordsmyth]

As I understand it, pitching a tent on a college quad and threatening to sleep in it.

It was a lot more than that, and you know it.

 

[acptulsa]

It was a lot more than that, and you know it.

No, unless you're talking about what was done that wasn't illegal. If that's what you're talking about, then the reason you won't come out and say anything factual and useful is because this deportation has nothing to do with this alien assaulting Americans, and everything to do with politics.