• Welcome to our new home!

    Please share any thoughts or issues here.


Trump's Hate Speech Will Get You Deported EO

I don't care if religion is used as the basis of rights I just don't like the idea of the BoR being the rights we expect the entire world to follow. That's called globalism!
I believe the whole world SHOULD follow them, but I believe we should not do anything to make them do so, at best we can evangelize them.
Much like Christianity.
 
A, there are places that will take them

That's completely irrelevant to the point. You're still contradicting the resident neozionist. If there weren't, then it's genocide.

It's also not particularly true. Most of the populations in that area will not. Some consider doing so aiding and abetting Israel in their crimes. Others just hate Palestinians. Are you saying let England take them?

B, that's not our problem, it's their problem for making themselves unwelcome by engaging in terrorism everywhere they go

They haven't gone anywhere. They've been there since biblical times. They could never have made enemies of the Zionists through terror if the Zionists hadn't invaded and put themselves in arm's teach.

Seems I've seen you say a thing or two about that. You approved of us doing it to the American Indians and deplore the Asian Indians doing it to us, as I recall. Pretty hypocritical, unless your only guiding principle is might makes right. And yet, it's Trump who has the might and it's Trump who is protecting, preserving and defending their "right" to H1B visas.

So, if you're complaining about Trump now, then by your own logic you're more likely to be a criminal, right?

It's so obviously how partisans constantly get hoist on their owners petards. It's as plain as the noses on their faces. Isn't amusing that they just can't see it?

Eyes to see, ears to hear...
 
I don't care if religion is used as the basis of rights I just don't like the idea of the BoR being the rights we expect the entire world to follow. That's called globalism!

There is a line between thinking they should and having expectations. Sometimes realizing your expectations of others through force is called globalism, sometimes it's called imperialism.
 
BTW ISRAEL just passed new budget..... INCREASING THEIR GOVERMENT by 21%!!
 
Last edited:
That's completely irrelevant to the point. You're still contradicting the resident neozionist.



They haven't gone anywhere. They've been there since biblical times. They could never have made enemies of the Zionists through terror if the Zionists hadn't invaded and put themselves in arm's teach.

Seems I've seen you say a thing or two about that. You approved of us doing it to the American Indians and deplore the Asian Indians doing it to us, as I recall. Pretty hypocritical, unless your only guiding principle is might makes right. And yet, it's Trump who has the might and it's Trump who is protecting, preserving and defending their "right" to H1B visas.

So, if you're complaining about Trump now, then by your own logic you're more likely to be a criminal, right?

It's so obviously how partisans constantly get hoist on their owners petards. It's as plain as the noses on their faces. Isn't amusing that they just can't see it?

Eyes to see, ears to hear...
Egypt and Jordan both took in Palestinians, and both immediately had them engage in terrorism and attempt to overthrow the government.
And every other place that has accepted them has found them to be far worse than even the other muslims they let in. (who all have much higher rates of crime and terrorism than the natives)

I have defended my ancestors conquering this land, and I always will, they brought civilization to a barbarous frontier, I am also aware that the times were different then but also do not categorically condemn conquest in all possible cases even now.
That doesn't mean we or anyone else has to accept having it done.
Trump is not giving them a right to H1Bs, he's cutting down on the number granted as a privilege, might doesn't make right and supporting conquest in some situations doesn't require that to be true, I don't always 100% agree with Trump and believe he needs to end H1Bs like he promised he would.

You are really making a fool of yourself by contorting the principle that the people who complain about money being delayed in order to detect fraud are more likely to be engaged in fraud into some acid trip about everyone who complains about anything is automatically guilty of some crime.
 
You are really making a fool of yourself by contorting the principle that the people who complain about money being delayed in order to detect fraud are more likely to be engaged in fraud into some acid trip about everyone who complains about anything is automatically guilty of some crime.

Sometimes I just can't resist doing what I see the monkey do. Never have that particular problem until you show up and contort the snot out of every principle you ever espoused.
 
Sometimes I just can't resist doing what I see the monkey do. Never have that particular problem until you show up and contort the snot out of every principle you ever espoused.

He doesn’t espouse any discernible principles that I can see. Like many paleo-cons, perhapse even most, he isn’t really pursuing liberty either. All he really wants, like those aforementioned paleos, is POWER, so he can use it to punish people he doesn’t like, and force the rest of us, through brutality and violence, to live according to his subjective preferences. Nothing you can do with, or say to people like that. Jst be aware of what they are and be careful.
 
All he really wants, like those aforementioned paleos, is POWER, so he can use it to punish people he doesn’t like, and force the rest of us...

He likes us?

I can't tell that he likes anybody -- including himself -- who isn't too powerful to bother taking any notice of him at all.
 
It's hilarious to watch Knickers in a Knot argue that bombing the West Bank isn't genocide because they can just run away, even as you argue that they have no right to go anywhere.

Funny how often partisans contradict each other. And themselves too.
How we govern our territory isn't the same argument as our foreign policy.

I think we shouldn't interfere everywhere.

I think we should declare neutrality when it's beneficial for us. When we don't have skin in the game.

In the Israeli conflict it's too late to declare neutrality which is unfortunate but it's reality.

We are already seen as a belligerent and probably, rightfully so, by one side in that war and that side of the war would seek their revenge against us-perhaps even 1000 years ago from now.

We have skin in the game. Which isn't a good thing but that's the reality.
 
In the Israeli conflict it's too late to declare neutrality which is unfortunate but it's reality.

Why do I have the feeling that the Zionists got us in this mess by saying the same thing about the Crusades? In for a penny, in for Armageddon again, broken record?

Only warhawks invent excuses for not declaring peace.
 
Why do I have the feeling that the Zionists got us in this mess by saying the same thing about the Crusades? In for a penny, in for Armageddon again, broken record?

Only warhawks invent excuses for not declaring peace.

The US has a long history of declaring neutrality. The warhawks and neocons call that isolationism. The idea where we should declare neutrality when we have skin in the game isnt rational. You can't be neutral when you have skin in the game.
 
The CIA has plenty of skin in the game. I sure as hell don't.
Whether you like it or not, we are a United States, and we are a target, and we are seen as a belligerent.

Whether we surrender or respond in kind to being a target after being attacked or prior to being attacked to prevent another attack is our choice.

My philosophy, is that if you have skin in the game play ball.
 
He doesn’t espouse any discernible principles that I can see. Like many paleo-cons, perhapse even most, he isn’t really pursuing liberty either. All he really wants, like those aforementioned paleos, is POWER, so he can use it to punish people he doesn’t like, and force the rest of us, through brutality and violence, to live according to his subjective preferences. Nothing you can do with, or say to people like that. Jst be aware of what they are and be careful.
You say that, but even if he had his way 100%, this country would still be hugely more free than it is now.

You choose the wrong people to focus your ire.
 
You say that, but even if he had his way 100%, this country would still be hugely more free than it is now.

You choose the wrong people to focus your ire.

If he had his way he’d put me and others like me up against a wall and have us shot. Or throw us out of helicopters. He’s said as much, although in veiled terms, several times in the past. It doesn’t surprise me that you have trouble recognizing the enemies within your own gates. I hope that someday you get past that. In the meantime, you’re entitled to your opinion, but don’t expect me to take it too seriously until you do get past that.
 
Last edited:
If he had his way he’d put me and others like me up against a wall and have us shot. Or throw us out of helicopters. He’s said as much, although in veiled terms, several times in the past.

Source?

It doesn’t surprise me that you have trouble recognizing the enemies within your own gates. I hope that someday you get past that. In the meantime, you’re entitled to your opinion, but don’t expect me to take it too seriously until you do get past that.

It's not hard for me to believe that you'd unnecessarily vilify somebody. Heck, you vilify me for a single issue - tariffs. Besides that issue, we're basically in complete agreement, and yet you've pretty much called me an enemy of liberty also. So... shrug!!
 
Back
Top