kahless
Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2007
- Messages
- 10,200
As far as actually helping Rand, I think this does nothing and maybe hurts him since he isn't going to win over Trump voters by attacking him and even if he succeeds in damaging the Trump brand those voters aren't going to go to Rand. They're going to go Ted Cruz or Ben Carson or Mike Huckabee or wherever, I think Rand would of been better off trying to position himself to scoop up Trump voters for when/if his candidacy blows up as Cruz is doing, The establishment and mushy moderates aren't going to support Rand as the "reasonable alternative" and it is dumb to even try, they have way more preferable options for themselves, they'll definitely utilize Rand tho, kills two birds with one stones by taking the blood off the hands for going after Trump and damages the Paul/libertarian brand with the rebelling segment of the GOP. Saves them the trouble of having their own establishment candidate getting put thru the ringer by Trump, why do you think they're all afraid to attack him?
Although most of Rand's statements on Trump last night were accurate, the strategy of Rand burning that bridge is truly mind blowing. He could have rode the anti-establishment wave with him and try to bring the Trump voters back into his fold, instead of what appears to the voter as positioning himself as a voice of the establishment.
Instead of talking about issues important to people last night he focused on attacking Trump to the point of repeating himself. He could have handled it like Huckabee and the others, get it out of the way first and move on to YOUR own campaign.
Rand is not giving the people the red meat they are looking for in these interviews that will send them back over to his campaign. Now he has the anti-establishment front-runner tearing him a new one like he is the Lyndsey Graham of the party.