Trump takes the bait? How will Paul respond?

[SpiritOf1776_J4]

If I were the rest of the gop, I'd let rand continue to attack trump - giving him opportunity to do so, figuring rand can't win - - and that rand would do a good job exposing trump, while the other candidates risk nothing.

 

[nikcers]

Why explain things by supply and demand when you can attribute them to conspiracy?

I love when paid shills call me a conspiracy theorist.

 

[jj-]

I love when paid shills call me a conspiracy theorist.

Even if I were paid, the funnier thing would still be seeing people pontificating on Ron Paul forum before even grasping supply and demand.

 

[nikcers]

Even if I were paid, the funnier thing would still be seeing people pontificating on Ron Paul forum before even grasping supply and demand.

 

[jj-]

I see you have the tactic of changing topics when your foolishness is shown. A more productive thing for you than posting from reddit and changing topics would be to simply read a basic econ book and internalize the concepts of supply and demand. That would prevent you from making foolish comments, and you wouldn't even have to spend any time changing topics to distract from your original comments.

 

[nikcers]

I see you have the tactic of changing topics when your foolishness is shown. A more productive thing for you than posting from reddit and changing topics would be to simply read a basic econ book and internalize the concept of supply and demand. That would prevent you from making foolish comments, and you wouldn't even have to spend any time changing topics to distract from your original comments.

The media doesn't work that way, the media reports what the execs want them to report. Supply and demand is free market economics, we are not free JJ.

 

[jj-]

The media doesn't work that way, the media reports what the execs want them to report. Supply and demand is free market economics, we are not free JJ.

Part of it is. If you disagree, don't argue with me -I don't like arguing with people who change topics when their foolishness is shown-, but you can take it with CPUd who made the exact same point that I did.

 

[nikcers]

Part of it is. If you disagree, don't argue with me -I don't like arguing with people who change topics when their foolishness is shown-, but you can take it with CPUd who made the exact same point that I did.

No all of it is, media companies make a loss on paper, its a manipulated market owned by corporations that want to keep their power to manipulate people and their views. The internet started cutting into it and that's why we have paid shills. That's why when they report on shootings, more shootings happen. That's why when they report on Trump, people think they are supposed to vote for Trump.

 

[jj-]

No all of it is, media companies make a loss on paper

Fox is making a loss on paper? As I said, take it with CPUd or someone willing, I'm not interested in arguing with people who change topics when their foolishness is shown as a debate tactic.

 

[nikcers]

Fox is making a loss? As I said, take it with CPUd or someone willing, I'm not interested in arguing with people who changes topics when their foolishness is shown as a debate tactic.

Yeah Fox is dying, Fox is old media. They are going to go the way of newspapers soon enough. No one wants to pay for news.

 

[Okaloosa]

Virginia State Senator Steve Martin shared this on his personal Facebook page earlier.

Unless you've had your head in the sand, you know that Donald Trump has reversed his positions on Immigration, Obamacare, and funding Planned Parenthood somewhat recently. His most recent change was to call for defunding Planned Parenthood, but even that position didn't last but a couple weeks or so. He now says that because he believes there are good things about Planned Parenthood, he would be willing to continue to give them access to taxpayer funds.
When every position of importance is new to a candidate, and he can't even stand by them for a month, you must question the sincerity of it all. I've concluded the Donald is good at selling whatever he says, and I do not believe he is sincere about any of those three big issues. He has laid out strong arguments in recent years completely contrary to his present positions (I should say temporary positions in light of the PP funding 180, followed by another 180).
We shall see how gullible the voters are.
Don't worry, I'll expect the arguments of 'he doesn't take any cuff from ... etc.' and, 'we're tired of ...' Yep. He does love to argue in defense of whatever he's selling at the moment. That's true. Let that sink in ... If you've let that sink in, you know it means he's not sincere, which means you know for an absolute fact that he cannot be trusted. So, please spare me the drama. There is no argument that could be made to convince me he is sincere, and can be trusted to do what he says he will.
I'd offer the question another candidate asked last Thursday: "What are the principles that guide you?" The only principle I can imagine consistent with his behavior is the principle of, "I must have my way." That will not serve us well, as "his way" is all about (as he argued Thursday when explaining why he's benefited so much at the expense of other businesses and taxpayers via bankruptcy) adding more $Billions to his name.
There's nothing wrong with having such a strong profit motive. But, in my presidential candidate, I want to know there are principles guiding them that will lead them where they need to be for our nation's sake.

 

[Patrick Henry]

Dear Patrick Henry,

You sent a payment for $20.16 USD to Rand Paul for President.

Amount you have sent: $20.16 USD
Your total charge: $20.16 USD
Rand Paul for President will receive: $20.16 USD
Sent on: August 11, 2015

 

[twomp]

Why would the "establishment" be against teh Donald? He wants war with Iran. He still wants the NSA to read your grandma's emails. He is providing a great distraction so they can quietly sink Rand Paul's campaign. The best thing Rand Paul can do is stay relevant by having teh Donald keep his name in the news. The more the better.

 

[hells_unicorn]

Yeah Fox is dying, Fox is old media. They are going to go the way of newspapers soon enough. No one wants to pay for news.

I for one am going to try to get my parents to drop their cable subscription the next time I visit them. I'm tired of hearing about how pissed off my dad is at O'Reilly and all of these other clowns for not backing conservatives yet still sees fit to pay their salaries. Fox News will eventually die off, and I hope to be able to help it happen just a little quicker if I can.