Trump Pushes Back Against Neocon Plan to Invade Syria

danno answer pinned you down. just own your sarcastic mistake.

Found 'he killed children to remind the guy they had a deal--and to make his daughter happy too' a compelling argument, did you?

And I suppose you find it equally compelling when he says, 'It's your own fault the brainwashing isn't convincing you--work harder at it'?

It's a great debate, well worth the watch. It's good to hear Bill Mitchell's side as well, if people want to have an intelligent discussion on the subject, even if he is wrong.

It's not my fault if you are too intellectually lazy to listen to Stef. Maybe you should work on that.
 
The way you disrupt conversation, it wouldn't surprise anyone paying attention if it was a good cop/bad cop routine. Could you shut the fuck up for a few months?


I'm not the one disrupting the conversation, chief. Could you try to pay attention and not be so wrapped up in yourself?
 
Last edited:
How long are you Party Matters Trolls going to keep trying to convince people that there's any difference at all between One Worlder Clinton and her longtime buddy One Worlder Trump?


As long as the clueless members here keep trying to convince others that someone who is anti-Donny is necessarily liberty minded.
 
hqdefault.jpg


There are no Trump supporters on RPF.
 
As long as the clueless members here keep trying to convince others that someone who is anti-Donny is necessarily liberty minded.

Got proof?

Don't tell me to read your signature. You accused him of saying, 'If not A then B.' I agree that's untrue. I know people who did not support Trump because they would (and did!) vote for Be'ezelbub in Drag if that meant they could say they saw a woman sworn in as president before they died. Clearly supporting liberty was not a major motivation for these people. So, 'If not A then B' is a lie.

But did the Count say that? In your signature, you quote him as saying, 'If A, then not B.' To state, 'If A, then not B,' is not at all the same as stating, 'If not A, then B.' In fact, I happen to agree that 'If A, then not B' is true. And truth be known, all of those who supported Trump seem to have realized they were not supporting liberty, except those who, like dannno and Mordan, are 110% Reality Resistant.

So, if you are saying that the Count is a liar because he says, 'If not A, then B,' and he has never said that at all, then who's the liar? If you are saying he believes 'If not A, then B' because he actually said, 'If A then not B,' then who is misleading people?

Got a mirror?
 
Got proof?


It's not called proof. Proof is the domain of mathematics.

Either way, you sure changed your tune. You were one of the lead people criticizing these trolls a year (or so) ago. What in the world happened to you? I have to say that I'm surprised. Should I be?
 
It's not called proof. Proof is the domain of mathematics.

Either way, you sure changed your tune. You were one of the lead people criticizing these trolls a year (or so) ago. What in the world happened to you? I have to say that I'm surprised. Should I be?

It's called proof by every lawyer, judge and jury in the English speaking world. Only kangaroo courts and lynch mobs consider it irrelevant to anyone who isn't a mathematician.

And hounding the Count is your game. It was never mine. I can't say I've never disagreed with him. But putting words in his mouth so I had an excuse to hound him was never my style.
 
Well, boo hoo. I don't see the hound dog crying about his own game. Only you. But you sure changed your tune. Bet I can guess why.

Or maybe you couldn't name 'my tune' if it bit you in the ass.

The powers that be divide and conquer us by convincing us that voting for the lesser of two evils is worthwhile. They pit us at each others' throats fighting over alleged minor differences between their puppets so we'll vote for one of their puppets. If they couldn't fool us into thinking there's enough difference between their puppets to make one worth getting mad at and voting against, we might be able to think clearly enough to vote against both of them.

You're way behind. The season for ripping each other's throats out over which evil might be the lesser evil is over. Now is the time for us to wake up to the terrible morning after, and realize that the evil we elected is absolutely identical to the evil we didn't elect. Different puppet, same hand up its ass.

When are you going to catch up?

I'm honestly curious why you think that might be. Feel free to PM. I'm sincerely curious.

Witch hunters never answer that question. They know they're better off leaving it up to your imagination.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top