Trump Pushes Back Against Neocon Plan to Invade Syria

parocks said:
Fire McMaster!

Shouldn't Trump realize that what he needs to do right now with his foreign policy team is a hard reset, the point of this story is what, Trump has conflicts with his own employees who he hired. Now, he has saboteurs in the CIA who he doesn't know about, and his hand picked people apparently aren't doing what he wants. Get rid of them. Get the old ones back, get Bannon back and the one who just quit and get rid of McMaster and his allies.

Trump should know what's going on here, if what we're hearing is accurate, neocon snake weasels taking over the foreign policy. We don't want that. We'll take the ones that everyone calls nazis. They don't seem to like the war as much.
Click to expand...

I have a strong suspicion that Pence and Cotton forced McMaster on Trump because he's not too shrewd on potential employee research. It's already been confirmed that Cotton personally recommended him to the POTUS.
 
CPUd said:
Why would he want to get rid of these guys when everyone who used to be mean to him are now going on the shows masturbating to his missile videos? And out of all those missiles fired, he didn't really do much damage, probably just some empty oil drums and decommissioned planes got hit. If they were truly doing damage, wouldn't Jared and the military generals back out instead of sending more weapons there?
Click to expand...

Well, those people who used to be mean to him aren't voting for him. They just are forcing Trump to do what they want. Trump may (or may not) lose support from the people who actually voted him, and he might want to avoid losing.

Fire McMaster. It's an easy solution. It might not be a real solution, but it's an easy one to explain. We don't like the policy, we can blame it on McMaster. Get rid of that specific neocon guy we don't like, replace with someone who isn't a neocon.
 
"The war agenda is going ahead with or without you, Mr. Trump. The only decision you have is whether you want to stay the President of the USA"
 
parocks said:
Well, those people who used to be mean to him aren't voting for him. They just are forcing Trump to do what they want. Trump may (or may not) lose support from the people who actually voted him, and he might want to avoid losing.

Fire McMaster. It's an easy solution. It might not be a real solution, but it's an easy one to explain. We don't like the policy, we can blame it on McMaster. Get rid of that specific neocon guy we don't like, replace with someone who isn't a neocon.
Click to expand...

Well he doesn't need votes from the commoners right now, he needs votes from the Congress for his trillion dollar infrastructure and historic military buildup and we don't even know if he runs for a second term, though he's raising money for it anyway. By 2020 people will have forgotten all about this nasty stuff and will vote for the candidate who will protect them from the terrorists and globalist antifa protesters.
 
TheCount said:
Oooh now his supporters can convince themselves that Trump really is anti-interventionist because yeah he spent $100 mill in missiles hitting a Syrian airfield, but at least he didn't do more. Double bonus Trumpkin points if you include "and Hillary would have done done more" at the end of the justification.
Click to expand...



Still butt hurt because your boy Hillary lost?
 
I'm so glad this video has been widely distributed across all forms of media. Still, I keep seeing MSM outlets stating these thugs "were forced to remove" the "non-compliant" passenger, and that United has the right to refuse boarding. But both statements are false: United can refuse to let a passenger board the plane, but the passenger had already boarded. United could have upped the amount for a raincheck booking and they would have avoided the bad press that will now likely cost them millions in lost revenue and PR damage control.
 
dannno said:
[/LEFT]
https://www.infowars.com/trump-pushes-back-against-neo-con-plan-to-invade-syria/
Click to expand...

LOL. This is rich. So Paul Joseph Watson is back on the Trump train. I guess he figured he couldn't make it on his own without Alex Jones like Joe Biggs. :rolleyes:

The polling on this is obvious and Trump is all about the polling. The American people are all "Ewe Ess Aye" for throwing around a few cruise missiles but not up for a ground war. Trump is Clinton's protege' and Clinton fought the Bosnian war entirely as an air war. Obama fought the Libya war entirely as an air war. Air war = low U.S. casualties = higher public support.

Edit: ROFLMAO!

Paul Joseph Watson wrote this B.S.?

The air strike ordered by Trump was apparently a reminder to Assad of the deal he struck to step down once jihadists had been defeated.

Troop numbers are now being massively escalated in western Iraq to reinforce this message, including the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, to back up and cover the flank for U.S. Army ground forces in case of possible attack by Assad.

Trump’s response to the alleged chemical weapons attack allowed him to look decisive and was a show of strength towards China and North Korea. It also served to temporarily silence the repeated accusations that he is in collusion with Russia.

Trump’s aim with the air strike was to destroy Syria’s remaining chemical weapons to make Assad follow through on the deal. If he didn’t act, Trump would have been eviscerated by his critics as being equally as weak as Obama.

Okay. So does he now believe the chemical weapons attack was "real" or "false flag?" If he thinks it's false flag, then why is he sure that Assad still has chemical weapons? If he thinks it's real then why does he call it an "alleged" attack? And what evidence of Paul Joseph Watson have of Assad's chemical weapons? And why does PJW apparently think that Assad needs to go? Why does Trump apparently think Assad needs to go?
 
Last edited:
dannno said:
Like your election polling :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Dannno, serious questions. Why does Assad need to go? What evidence does Paul Joseph Watson, or Donald Trump have that Assad still has his chemical weapons stockpiles? Does PJW now accept the mainstream media narrative that the chemical attack was "real" as opposed to false flag? If it is false flag, then what's the basis for PJW saying that Assad hasn't gotten rid of his chemical weapons? If it is real, then why is PJW calling it an "alleged" attack? This sounds like a lot of BS and CYA spinning by infowars.com.
 
timosman said:
Please do not be so mean to him. He is a valuable member of the forum.
Click to expand...


I'm sorry; I will try to do better.



XRpwx.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Snowball
Trump: We're going back into Afghanistan.
2
Replies
32
Views
754
GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged
G
PAF
Trump Shatters Record for US Airstrikes in Somalia
Replies
4
Views
41
sparebulb
S
Swordsmyth
'Not Our Fight!': Trump Weighs In On Syria's Unraveling
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
PAF
PAF
PAF
Trump Wants To Bring Back Department of War
Replies
9
Views
102
acptulsa
acptulsa
Swordsmyth
Trump Plans To Finally Withdraw US Troops From Syria, Israelis Say
2
Replies
27
Views
634
acptulsa
acptulsa
Back
Top