Trump Is Exactly Where The Elites Want Him

lu7UHvx.jpg
 
Cognitive dissonance is a powerful drug.

All that word vomit ignored, knowing it starts with a trolling insult. Hence, the rest of the article, I am sure, is a troll. No thanks. Not going to waste my time being trolled.
 
Trump's cabinet is radically different from Romney cabinet both good and bad. Overall Trump's picks are what I like best about him.

And it is interesting that working for Soros makes you "troubling." Soros has employed a number of very prominent libertarians. Working for Goldman Sachs for a few years or Soros doesn't make you part of the illuminati. Those places attract top talent.

Let's say not everybody is excited about bringing freedom to the masses. Some want their talents to be appreciated. Nothing says appreciation more like a big, fat check.
 
THIS^^^ was my POV from the beginning.

It seemed obvious that the MSM was supporting Trump through all the 24/7 "negative" news. while RP was He Who Must Not Be Named. If they had ignored Trump like Ron Paul, then I would have assumed he was a danger. As it was, Trump was made to seem like THE candidate to make voters think they were fighting the system, only to have the system win.

Winner winner, chicken dinner.

People get paid to strategize this stuff. Trump and the brier patch, figure it out folks. You gonna boil a frog quickly? No, you gotta convince the frog it was their idea, and allow the frog to beg for more heat.

The Paul runs, and Ron's wisdom over the years spell this out clearly for any who care to pay attention. Watch the republicans act like democrats under a Trump admin. It's happened before, it's going to happen again. The Google Sachs of America.

"We don't want to talk about Donald Trump, but he's in the news again" That was my tip off, about 2 + years ago.

If only we could get those frogs to tighten their own nooses...

“Emotions are raw and tensions just don’t heal overnight,” the incoming president said in a video message released on the eve of the national holiday. He continued, “It’s my prayer that on this Thanksgiving we begin to heal our divisions and move forward as one country strengthened by shared purpose and very, very common resolve.”

Let us give thanks for all that we have, and let us boldly face the exciting new frontiers that lie ahead. Happy Thanksgiving. pic.twitter.com/yH6LYdS2ts
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 24, 2016

I hope to eat my hat, yet Trump isn't talking about my natural rights... EVER, so I gotta go with Trump is b.s., and his hopefuls are delusional. Nature of man, no hard feelings.:)
 
Lol, the one star Trump crowd struck again I see.

If nothing else, I think it's common courtesy to say when you 1 star a thread. I always tell people when I 1 star their thread. Which isn't really that often. Maybe once or twice a year. If that. And it's usualy, one of S_F's circlejerks when I do.
 
Trump won the election because he serves the interests of the establishment. Trump won because he is a fake.

This is not an idea that many liberty activists want to entertain.

This is patently false. The fact is that an enormous percentage of liberty activists more than "entertained" the notion that Trump was an establishment charade. And (the author of this article better sit down for this..) Trump was most certainly not elected by liberty activists in any significant way.
 
You’ll hear hundreds of theories and rationalizations on Trump’s miraculous victory, but a reason you will almost never hear is also the most likely one: Trump won the election because he serves the interests of the establishment. Trump won because he is a fake.

So the Democrats, the media and the establishment Republicans all colluded to fight Trump tooth and nail, try to discredit him, lie about him, destroying the remnants of the legacy media (formerly known as the MSM) and themselves all so they could get Trump elected.. I dunno, man, that theory seems pretty far out and I've heard some pretty far out theories as to why they weren't able to overcome Trump with vote fraud and such.

I heard a theory from a video made from back in 2011 before Trump decided to run that the elites had some sort of future time seeing device that they were using in the later part of the 20th and very early part of the 21st century that they used, among other things, to see what precincts they would have to advertise more in or rig with voting machines or whatever in order to win, and that is why you had all these Presidential elections (i.e. 2000 and 2004) that came down to a percent or less because that was all they needed.

In fact allegedly Saddam Hussein had one of these future time seeing devices that was dug up from ancient Babylon or some shit, and the elites were trying to get it back from him and that was really what the war in Iraq was all about.

Supposedly they had to shut off all of these devices because they were using too much of some kinda energy that was going to destroy everything or something and so in 2006 they had them all shut off. So since then they haven't been able to rig elections like they used to. So Hillary had to fly blind in 2008, which is why she lost, and then in 2016 again.

Anyway, I think your theory is more far out than that one, but I suppose it's possible.
 
Last edited:
How does Brexit serve the elites?

Possibly that was sarcasm.

If the globalists are somehow reverse, not reverse psychologically not inverting a master opposite plan to use Trump as a means to not not further themselves, they've done a pretty good job of painting themselves as a target.

The thing is, the author in the original post accuses Trump supporters of 'mental gymnastics.'

But as long as there's always some conspiratorial plan we can cook up as to what they're up to, this could go on ad infinitum.

Maybe the elites expected us to think they secretly wanted Trump to win so that we won't offer any support to him. See how that works?

All we can really do is wait and see.
 
Last edited:
Oh yes. They wanted him so badly that they insulted and took him out of context 24/7. Come to think of it, that's what happened on RPFs. Does that mean that those starting thread after thread bashing him and the associated panty-twisters actually wanted Trump to win? Is that your argument?

Yeah cause RPF has such a strong impact on who gets election coverage. :rolleyes:
 
Yeah cause RPF has such a strong impact on who gets election coverage. :rolleyes:

It's funny to think about though. If attacking Trump makes him stronger, we've got a few guys here who are carrying an ocean full of water for him, lol.
 
Well, whatever was supposed to happen obviously didn't go according to plan for the Clintons. Watch Hillary's concession speech, Bill was standing behind her practically choking back tears.

It's pretty much Trump's call what he wants to do with all the momentum, because I don't think the establishment planned for him to end up with it, otherwise they wouldn't have thrown every minute of broadcasting air time trying to slow him down once they realized they fk'd up and created a charismatic monster.

But, I'm not expecting much. I just don't see it so clear-cut that he was an establishment pawn. Theories that he was a goofball candidate that the elites didn't think would win are plausible.

I can't get over the fact that the establishment sacrificed their greatest tool this year though, and that's media credibility. If you can't control the minds, you can't control the people, so, far as I can tell, that was a risky sacrifice. I mean, Trump will only be in office for 8 years at most. How long has CNN been around? They pretty much traded a sure-thing for a crapshoot.

Oh there's no doubt things didn't go according to the Clintons plan. Hillary was supposed to become president in 2008 remember? The only thing that stood in her way was some clown who just 4 years before had been nothing but a state senator. Sure he was being groomed to be POTUS eventually but 2008 was "Hillary's time." The mafia has infighting. That doesn't mean whoever ends up on top is not straight up mafia. Hell. We have the head of Exxon-Mobile as secretary of state and he got recommended to Trump by Condelezza Rice and Dick freaking Cheney. We've got a Goldman Sachs exec recommended for Treasury secretary. So.........if the swamp is being drained.......where's the water going?
 
It's funny to think about though. If attacking Trump makes him stronger, we've got a few guys here who are carrying an ocean full of water for him, lol.

Yeah...it's funny but not accurate. Hey, LibertyEagle has "Gary Johnson is a traitor" in her sig. I guess she's carrying water for Gary Johnson. And here's the other thing. There were so many threads praising Trump and claiming (falsely) that he was somehow "better than Ron Paul" (LibertyEagle feels he is on immigration) that there was no way for people who didn't like Trump to carry on a "Let's not talk about Trump" strategy unless the mods decided that's what they wanted. If the person you are going against is being talked about 24/7 anyway then your only recourse is to at least try to balance off positive pumping with the truth. For example just yesterday and Trumpster said he hoped Trump would cut the Pentagon budget. But Trump is on record saying he will increase the Pentagon budget. People have bought into Trump fairy tales and just made up new ones a pouring their hopes and dreams into an empty suit. It's almost cultish.
 
Yeah cause RPF has such a strong impact on who gets election coverage. :rolleyes:

Well the only question is whether they were perpetuating the media and the establishment's actions (which according to the OP were to get Trump elected) out of ignorance that they were helping Donald Trump win or whether they actually wanted Donald Trump to win.

I had wondered that before as well, and probably even posted about it a few times. I accused certain posters of all kinds of crooked plots, most people just accused them of supporting Hillary. But I was all over the place on Trump for quite a while, I couldn't figure out what was going on all I knew was I hated the MSM (now the legacy media). I was more encouraged in the months leading to the election, and have been fairly encouraged since the election.
 
Well the only question is whether they were perpetuating the media and the establishment's actions (which according to the OP were to get Trump elected) out of ignorance that they were helping Donald Trump win or whether they actually wanted Donald Trump to win.

I had wondered that before as well, and probably even posted about it a few times. I accused certain posters of all kinds of crooked plots, most people just accused them of supporting Hillary. But I was all over the place on Trump for quite a while, I couldn't figure out what was going on all I knew was I hated the MSM (now the legacy media). I was more encouraged in the months leading to the election, and have been fairly encouraged since the election.

Okay. I'll copy and paste my response to nobody_hero's response as it is appropriate here.

Yeah...it's funny but not accurate. Hey, LibertyEagle has "Gary Johnson is a traitor" in her sig. I guess she's carrying water for Gary Johnson. And here's the other thing. There were so many threads praising Trump and claiming (falsely) that he was somehow "better than Ron Paul" (LibertyEagle feels he is on immigration) that there was no way for people who didn't like Trump to carry on a "Let's not talk about Trump" strategy unless the mods decided that's what they wanted. If the person you are going against is being talked about 24/7 anyway then your only recourse is to at least try to balance off positive pumping with the truth. For example just yesterday and Trumpster said he hoped Trump would cut the Pentagon budget. But Trump is on record saying he will increase the Pentagon budget. People have bought into Trump fairy tales and just made up new ones a pouring their hopes and dreams into an empty suit. It's almost cultish.
 
So the Democrats, the media and the establishment Republicans all colluded to fight Trump tooth and nail, try to discredit him, lie about him, destroying the remnants of the legacy media (formerly known as the MSM) and themselves all so they could get Trump elected.. I dunno, man, that theory seems pretty far out and I've heard some pretty far out theories as to why they weren't able to overcome Trump with vote fraud and such.

^ This.

Only when Trump is impeached or assassinated will these fools finally get it.
 
Back
Top