Origanalist
Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2012
- Messages
- 43,060
Sociopaths gonna act sociopathically?
Well, it couldn't be to create more terrorists. I mean only someone who profits from war would do that. And we all know nobody profits from war, right?
Sociopaths gonna act sociopathically?
Obomber gave JSOC too much free reign, maybe to the point of exhaustion. In fairness to any subsequent President, DOD and CIA operations may be so entangled any President would be hard-pressed clarifying just what the hell's getting blown up today. A village? A mall? An airstrip?Post #13
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...Did-in-8-Yea&p=6582702&viewfull=1#post6582702
This is by no means definitive.. Both sides are skewed. I have no idea how many civilians have been killed, and you are right that 1 is too many. I do know that I attribute A LOT more deaths to Obama than what they say, since he created and funded ISIS.. and I am pretty sure Trump wants to keep things under control, he was fairly consistently anti-war for many years.. but I think he wanted to take a hard stand against ISIS and some of these countries and then review after they have been given a chance to fight and win and hopefully decide that it isn't worth it and end a lot of these conflicts... the sooner the better.
Well, it couldn't be to create more terrorists. I mean only someone who profits from war would do that. And we all know nobody profits from war, right?
Obomber gave JSOC too much free reign, maybe to the point of exhaustion. In fairness to any subsequent President, DOD and CIA operations may be so entangled any President would be hard-pressed clarifying just what the hell's getting blown up today. A village? A mall? An airstrip?
Trump Administration Wants to Increase CIA Drone Strikes
WASHINGTON — When President Donald Trump visited CIA headquarters in the first weeks of his presidency, he toured the secure floor where agency officers direct drone strikes against suspected terrorists, current and former U.S. officials told NBC News.
Impressed by what he saw, Trump conveyed to incoming CIA Director Mike Pompeo and the assembled agency officers that he wanted them to take a more aggressive posture, according to two current U.S. officials and one former official briefed on the visit.
Soon afterward, multiple sources said, the CIA began carrying out drone strikes that might not have been authorized under the Obama administration, including in Syria, where the military has taken the lead on targeting militant leaders.
The White House granted CIA officers more autonomy to decide on whether and when the U.S. can pull the trigger in various places around the world, including in Yemen, where the military carries out the bulk of the airstrikes, according to four U.S. officials who have been briefed on the agency's counterterrorism operations. The upshot is less micromanaging of targeting decisions by the White House, these officials say.
Now, the Trump administration is contemplating additional policy changes that will further expand the CIA's authority to conduct drone strikes in a number of countries, both in and out of war zones. Such a move would reverse years of effort by President Barack Obama to reduce the CIA's role in targeted killing and shift that responsibility to the military. It could also mean more civilian casualties in CIA drone strikes.
Trump ceded control over drone strikes to the CIA.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/military/trump-admin-wants-increase-cia-drone-strikes-n802311
Trump ceded control over drone strikes to the CIA.
Anyone who kills from afar is no friend of freedom.
Trump is the worst thing that could have happened to America. Now people cheer and wave flags and read his tweets and think that everything he does is nothing short of glorious.
F- on this issue.
Morally reprehensible and counterproductive.
All you do is make more "terrorists".
Eisenhower didn't start any new major wars. Neither did Kennedy, Carter, or even Nixon (unless you count this war on us and our freedoms).
Raimondo is, as usual, full of $#@!. Even so, it's a bit early for you Trumpsters to brag, don't you think? Truman didn't start Korea in his first year in office. Trump has plenty of time, and plenty of irons in the fire.
Yes, let's just give Ike a pass on sending the first military advisors to Vietnam. Kennedy never deployed the 3rd MEU to Thailand. Nixon didn't authorize an airlift to supply Israel during the Yom Kippur war. And Saint Jimmy never ever snuck supplies into Zaire in support of our dictator against rebels. Nary a dead civilian anywhere.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1977/04/22/tanks-asked-for-zaire/cc4bcd07-033e-40a3-855d-77dacbe6c348/?utm_term=.02b0d38c85e2
XNN
No new wars... unless you count ground operations in Yemen.Dannno, maybe this will cheer you up: Via Justin Rainmondo:
You're going to take deep state propaganda over Soros propaganda? How does one determine, between those two, which is best?This article claims that one study showed 95% of Airwars casualties were non-credible:
https://www.realcleardefense.com/ar..._reporting_101_check_your_sources_112395.html
Here is a prequel to that article:
https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/civilian-casualties-and-media
RIPCongrats, America. You broke liberty, ya bunch of $#@!s. And this is why we can't have nice things
Hey retard, read the fucking article
https://www.realcleardefense.com/ar..._reporting_101_check_your_sources_112395.html
The author is claiming that the sources are non-credible because some high ranking army officer said they aren't. Why the fuck should we believe what he says? The guy has been unapologetically serving in the terrorist US military his whole life. What does the author consider to be verified military strikes? Only if there's an official Pentagon report stating a strike occurred in X location with Y civilian deaths?
Read this article found on the same site
https://www.realcleardefense.com/20...us_military_airstrikes_unreported_290120.html
So 1000s of airstrikes go unreported officially by the military, but at the same time, 95% of the strikes reported by other sources are fake. How does this make any sense? It's obvious the Airwars figures are far more accurate than the absolute bullshit you are swallowing without question.
Eisenhower didn't start any new major wars. Neither did Kennedy, Carter, or even Nixon (unless you count this war on us and our freedoms).
Raimondo is, as usual, full of shit. Even so, it's a bit early for you Trumpsters to brag, don't you think? Truman didn't start Korea in his first year in office. Trump has plenty of time, and plenty of irons in the fire.
Yeah, but I was ahead of them (dannno posting group) by just 5 minutes. That's something.I suppose I should give you credit for that. But that was about as easy a prediction as forecasting that the national debt would go up today.